Partnerships in a Global Mental Health Research Programme-the Example of PRIME.
Global health
Global mental health
Low- and middle-income countries
Partnerships
Journal
Global social welfare : research, policy & practice
ISSN: 2196-8799
Titre abrégé: Glob Soc Welf
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101632247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
entrez:
28
1
2020
pubmed:
28
1
2020
medline:
28
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Collaborative research partnerships are necessary to answer key questions in global mental health, to share expertise, access funding and influence policy. However, partnerships between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries have often been inequitable with the provision of technical knowledge flowing unilaterally from high to lower income countries. We present the experience of the Programme for Improving Mental Health Care (PRIME), a LMIC-led partnership which provides research evidence for the development, implementation and scaling up of integrated district mental healthcare plans in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda. We use Tuckman's first four stages of forming, storming, norming and performing to reflect on the history, formation and challenges of the PRIME Consortium. We show how this resulted in successful partnerships in relation to management, research, research uptake and capacity building and reflect on the key lessons for future partnerships.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31984205
doi: 10.1007/s40609-018-0128-6
pmc: PMC6980236
mid: NIHMS1021528
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
159-175Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R023697/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH100470
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U19 MH110001
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M025470/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s1-3
pubmed: 26447177
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Apr 30;8:15
pubmed: 24808923
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):219-26
pubmed: 15855293
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s21-8
pubmed: 26447173
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s13-20
pubmed: 26447172
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Nov 25;11:70
pubmed: 29204183
Lancet. 2013 Jan 5;381(9860):55-62
pubmed: 23083627
Lancet. 2013 Jun 8;381(9882):1970-1
pubmed: 23746771
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 10;13:79
pubmed: 25879831
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 05;13:332
pubmed: 24305432
Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1241-52
pubmed: 17804059
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s55-62
pubmed: 26447178
Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1993-5
pubmed: 19493564
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s63-70
pubmed: 26447175
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):11-21
pubmed: 28965528
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001359
pubmed: 23300387
J Health Psychol. 2007 May;12(3):505-16
pubmed: 17440000
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s4-12
pubmed: 26447174
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1976-7
pubmed: 20483977
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s40-6
pubmed: 26447171
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 18;17(1):187
pubmed: 28521749
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s71-8
pubmed: 26447170
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s47-54
pubmed: 26447169
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Sep 14;10:30
pubmed: 22978604
Infant Ment Health J. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):624-9
pubmed: 25798511
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1672-85
pubmed: 26454360
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Jul 08;9:27
pubmed: 26155307
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208 Suppl 56:s29-39
pubmed: 26447176
Psychol Bull. 1965 Jun;63:384-99
pubmed: 14314073
BMJ. 2000 Sep 30;321(7264):827-9
pubmed: 11009530