Downscaling livestock census data using multivariate predictive models: Sensitivity to modifiable areal unit problem.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
09
2019
accepted:
18
12
2019
entrez:
28
1
2020
pubmed:
28
1
2020
medline:
4
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The analysis of census data aggregated by administrative units introduces a statistical bias known as the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). Previous researches have mostly assessed the effect of MAUP on upscaling models. The present study contributes to clarify the effects of MAUP on the downscaling methodologies, highlighting how a priori choices of scales and shapes could influence the results. We aggregated chicken and duck fine-resolution census in Thailand, using three administrative census levels in regular and irregular shapes. We then disaggregated the data within the Gridded Livestock of the World analytical framework, sampling predictors in two different ways. A sensitivity analysis on Pearson's r correlation statistics and RMSE was carried out to understand how size and shapes of the response variables affect the goodness-of-fit and downscaling performances. We showed that scale, rather than shapes and sampling methods, affected downscaling precision, suggesting that training the model using the finest administrative level available is preferable. Moreover, datasets showing non-homogeneous distribution but instead spatial clustering seemed less affected by MAUP, yielding higher Pearson's r values and lower RMSE compared to a more spatially homogenous dataset. Implementing aggregation sensitivity analysis in spatial studies could help to interpret complex results and disseminate robust products.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31986146
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221070
pii: PONE-D-19-20969
pmc: PMC6984718
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0221070Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Mar 27;18(1):6
pubmed: 30917821
GeoJournal. 2011 Oct;76(5):525-538
pubmed: 23576839
Sci Data. 2017 Jan 31;4:170004
pubmed: 28140397
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):3226-3241
pubmed: 30229698
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150424
pubmed: 26977807
Sci Data. 2018 Oct 30;5:180227
pubmed: 30375994
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:110-20
pubmed: 24713219
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011 May 1;141(3-4):381-389
pubmed: 21765567
Biometrics. 2003 Mar;59(1):9-17
pubmed: 12762436
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011 May 1;141(3-4):373-380
pubmed: 21822341
Int J Health Geogr. 2011 Oct 31;10:58
pubmed: 22040001
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 Nov;66(6):2482-2495
pubmed: 31342664
Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):850-3
pubmed: 24233722
Environ Plan A. 1984 Jan;16(1):17-31
pubmed: 12265900
Nature. 2018 Jan 18;553(7688):333-336
pubmed: 29320477
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0107042
pubmed: 25689585
PLoS One. 2008 Jan 09;3(1):e1408
pubmed: 18183289
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Feb;12(2):227-34
pubmed: 16494747
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:11-18
pubmed: 28131936
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2012 Mar 1;149:144-153
pubmed: 22323841
PLoS One. 2014 May 29;9(5):e96084
pubmed: 24875496
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:1089-1105
pubmed: 30970475