Evaluation of the Visibility and Artifacts of 11 Common Fiducial Markers for Image Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Abdomen.


Journal

Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 09 10 2019
revised: 12 01 2020
accepted: 16 01 2020
pubmed: 29 1 2020
medline: 7 8 2021
entrez: 29 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the visibility and artifacts of commercially available fiducial markers to optimize their selection for image guided stereotactic body radiation therapy. From 6 different vendors, we selected 11 fiducials commonly used in image guided radiation therapy. The fiducials varied in material composition (e.g., gold, platinum, carbon), shape (e.g., cylindrical, notched/linear, coiled, ball-like, step), and size measured in terms of diameter (0.28-1.0 mm) and length (3.0-20.0 mm). Each fiducial was centered in 4-mm bolus within a 13-cm-thick water-equivalent phantom. Fiducials were imaged with the use of a simulation computed tomography (CT) scanner, a CT-on-rails system, and an onboard cone beam CT system. Acquisition parameters were set according to clinical protocols. Visibility was assessed in terms of contrast (Δ Hounsfield unit [HU]) and the Michelson visibility metric. Artifacts were quantified in terms of relative standard deviation and relative streak artifacts level (rSAL). Twelve radiation oncologists ranked each fiducial in terms of clinical usefulness. Contrast and artifacts increased with fiducial size. For CT imaging, maximum contrast (2722 HU) and artifacts (rSAL = 2.69) occurred for the largest-diameter (0.75 mm) platinum fiducial. Minimum contrast (551 HU) and reduced artifacts (rSAL = 0.65) were observed for the smallest-diameter (0.28 mm) gold fiducial. Carbon produced the least severe artifacts (rSAL = 0.29). The survey indicated that physicians preferred gold fiducials with a 0.35- to 0.43-mm diameter, 5- to 10-mm length, and coiled or cylindrical shape that balanced contrast and artifacts. We evaluated 11 different fiducials in terms of visibility and artifacts. The results of this study may assist radiation oncologists who seek to maximize contrast, minimize artifacts, or balance contrast versus artifacts by fiducial selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31988039
pii: S1879-8500(20)30008-4
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.01.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

434-442

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jordan M Slagowski (JM)

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Lauren E Colbert (LE)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Irina M Cazacu (IM)

Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Ben S Singh (BS)

Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Rachael Martin (R)

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Eugene J Koay (EJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Cullen M Taniguchi (CM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Albert C Koong (AC)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Manoop S Bhutani (MS)

Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Joseph M Herman (JM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Sam Beddar (S)

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: abeddar@mdanderson.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH