Microscaled proteogenomic methods for precision oncology.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jan 2020
27 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
accepted:
31
12
2019
entrez:
29
1
2020
pubmed:
29
1
2020
medline:
11
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer proteogenomics promises new insights into cancer biology and treatment efficacy by integrating genomics, transcriptomics and protein profiling including modifications by mass spectrometry (MS). A critical limitation is sample input requirements that exceed many sources of clinically important material. Here we report a proteogenomics approach for core biopsies using tissue-sparing specimen processing and microscaled proteomics. As a demonstration, we analyze core needle biopsies from ERBB2 positive breast cancers before and 48-72 h after initiating neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. We show greater suppression of ERBB2 protein and both ERBB2 and mTOR target phosphosite levels in cases associated with pathological complete response, and identify potential causes of treatment resistance including the absence of ERBB2 amplification, insufficient ERBB2 activity for therapeutic sensitivity despite ERBB2 amplification, and candidate resistance mechanisms including androgen receptor signaling, mucin overexpression and an inactive immune microenvironment. The clinical utility and discovery potential of proteogenomics at biopsy-scale warrants further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31988290
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14381-2
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-14381-2
pmc: PMC6985126
doi:
Substances chimiques
MTOR protein, human
EC 2.7.1.1
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
532Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA210954
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES010126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA233223
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA210986
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA091842
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180860
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA214125
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002345
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014236
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA210979
Pays : United States
Références
Archer, T. C. et al. Proteomics, post-translational modifications, and integrative analyses reveal molecular heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 34, 396–410 (2018).
pubmed: 30205044
pmcid: 6372116
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.004
Mertins, P. et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature 534, 55–62 (2016).
pubmed: 27251275
pmcid: 5102256
doi: 10.1038/nature18003
Mundt, F. et al. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics reveals potential roles of NEK9 and MAP2K4 in resistance to PI3K inhibition in triple-negative breast cancers. Cancer Res. 78, 2732–2746 (2018).
pubmed: 29472518
pmcid: 5955814
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1990
Zhang, B. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 513, 382–387 (2014).
pubmed: 25043054
pmcid: 4249766
doi: 10.1038/nature13438
Vasaikar, S. et al. Proteogenomic analysis of human colon cancer reveals new therapeutic opportunities. Cell 177, 1035–1049 (2019).
pubmed: 31031003
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.030
Huang, K.-L. et al. Proteogenomic integration reveals therapeutic targets in breast cancer xenografts. Nat. Commun. 8, 14864 (2017).
pubmed: 28348404
pmcid: 5379071
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14864
Matsunuma, R. et al. DPYSL3 modulates mitosis, migration, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in claudin-low breast cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11978–E11987 (2018).
pubmed: 30498031
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810598115
Mertins, P. et al. Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1632–1661 (2018).
pubmed: 29988108
pmcid: 6211289
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0006-9
Slamon, D. J. et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235, 177–182 (1987).
pubmed: 3798106
doi: 10.1126/science.3798106
Vu, T. & Claret, F. X. Trastuzumab: updated mechanisms of action and resistance in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2, 62 (2012).
pubmed: 22720269
pmcid: 3376449
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00062
Li, S. et al. Endocrine-therapy-resistant ESR1 variants revealed by genomic characterization of breast-cancer-derived xenografts. Cell Rep. 4, 1116–1130 (2013).
pubmed: 24055055
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.022
Thompson, A. et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895–1904 (2003).
pubmed: 12713048
doi: 10.1021/ac0262560
Zecha, J. et al. TMT labeling for the masses: a robust and cost-efficient, in-solution labeling approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics 18, 1468–1478 (2019).
pubmed: 30967486
doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001385
Zhao, X. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of optimal cutting temperature (OCT) embedded core-needle biopsy of lung cancer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 2078–2089 (2017).
pubmed: 28752479
pmcid: 5693617
doi: 10.1007/s13361-017-1706-z
Krug, K. et al. A curated resource for phosphosite-specific signature analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 18, 576–593 (2018).
pubmed: 30563849
doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000943
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
McShane, L. M. et al. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Eur. J. Cancer 41, 1690–1696 (2005).
pubmed: 16043346
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.032
Zhang, H. et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization of human high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cell 166, 755–765 (2016).
pubmed: 27372738
pmcid: 4967013
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.069
Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11412
Ferrari, A. et al. A whole-genome sequence and transcriptome perspective on HER2-positive breast cancers. Nat. Commun. 7, 12222 (2016).
pubmed: 27406316
pmcid: 4947184
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12222
Wang, J. et al. Proteome profiling outperforms transcriptome profiling for coexpression based gene function prediction. Mol. Cell Proteomics 16, 121–134 (2017).
pubmed: 27836980
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.060301
Roskoski, R. Jr The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharm. Res 79, 34–74 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.11.002
Hsu, J. L. & Hung, M. C. The role of HER2, EGFR, and other receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 35, 575–588 (2016).
pubmed: 27913999
pmcid: 5215954
doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9649-6
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
pubmed: 4402510
pmcid: 4402510
Dankort, D. et al. Grb2 and Shc adapter proteins play distinct roles in Neu (ErbB-2)-induced mammary tumorigenesis: implications for human breast cancer. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 1540–1551 (2001).
pubmed: 11238891
pmcid: 86700
doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1540-1551.2001
D’Arcy, C. & Quinn, C. M. Apocrine lesions of the breast: part 2 of a two-part review. Invasive apocrine carcinoma, the molecular apocrine signature and utility of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of apocrine lesions of the breast. J. Clin. Pathol. 72, 7–11 (2019).
pubmed: 30425121
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205485
Stemke-Hale, K. et al. An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 68, 6084–6091 (2008).
pubmed: 18676830
pmcid: 2680495
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6854
Farahmand, L., Merikhian, P., Jalili, N., Darvishi, B. & Majidzadeh-A, K. Significant role of MUC1 in development of resistance to currently existing anti-cancer therapeutic agents. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 18, 737–748 (2018).
pubmed: 28669345
doi: 10.2174/1568009617666170623113520
Namba, M. et al. Anti-KL-6/MUC1 monoclonal antibody reverses resistance to trastuzumab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity by capping MUC1. Cancer Lett. 442, 31–39 (2019).
pubmed: 30389434
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.037
de Boer, H. R. et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis identifies MUC1 as an effect sensor of EGFR inhibition. Oncogene 38, 1477–1488 (2019).
pubmed: 30305724
doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0522-7
pmcid: 30305724
Carraway, K. L. et al. Muc4/sialomucin complex in the mammary gland and breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 6, 323–337 (2001).
pubmed: 11547901
doi: 10.1023/A:1011327708973
pmcid: 11547901
Nagy, P. et al. Decreased accessibility and lack of activation of ErbB2 in JIMT-1, a herceptin-resistant, MUC4-expressing breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 65, 473–482 (2005).
pubmed: 15695389
pmcid: 15695389
Mercogliano, M. F. et al. TNFalpha-induced mucin 4 expression elicits trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 636–648 (2017).
pubmed: 27698002
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0970
pmcid: 27698002
Dazert, E. et al. Quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics on serial tumor biopsies from a sorafenib-treated HCC patient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1381–1386 (2016).
pubmed: 26787912
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523434113
pmcid: 26787912
Guo, T. et al. Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps. Nat. Med. 21, 407–413 (2015).
pubmed: 25730263
pmcid: 4390165
doi: 10.1038/nm.3807
Akiyama, T. et al. The transforming potential of the c-erbB-2 protein is regulated by its autophosphorylation at the carboxyl-terminal domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 833–842 (1991).
pubmed: 1671296
pmcid: 359735
doi: 10.1128/MCB.11.2.833
Chen, C. H. et al. MEK inhibitors induce Akt activation and drug resistance by suppressing negative feedback ERK-mediated HER2 phosphorylation at Thr701. Mol. Oncol. 11, 1273–1287 (2017).
pubmed: 28632938
pmcid: 5579385
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12102
Loi, S. et al. Effects of estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 levels on the efficacy of trastuzumab: a secondary analysis of the HERA trial. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1040–1047 (2016).
pubmed: 27100299
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0339
pmcid: 27100299
Gordon, M. A. et al. Synergy between androgen receptor antagonism and inhibition of mTOR and HER2 in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 1389–1400 (2017).
pubmed: 28468774
pmcid: 5517319
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0111
Raina, D. et al. Targeting the MUC1-C oncoprotein downregulates HER2 activation and abrogates trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 33, 3422–3431 (2014).
pubmed: 23912457
doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.308
Andre, F. et al. Everolimus for women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 580–591 (2014).
pubmed: 24742739
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70138-X
Schmid, P. et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615
Caldwell, C. Jr et al. Identification and validation of a PD-L1 binding peptide for determination of PDL1 expression in tumors. Sci. Rep. 7, 13682 (2017).
pubmed: 29057919
pmcid: 5651871
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10946-2
Hebert, A. S. et al. Comprehensive single-shot proteomics with FAIMS on a hybrid orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 90, 9529–9537 (2018).
pubmed: 29969236
pmcid: 6145172
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02233
Pfammatter, S., Bonneil, E., McManus, F. P. & Thibault, P. Accurate quantitative proteomic analyses using metabolic labeling and high field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS). J. Proteome Res. 18, 2129–2138 (2019).
pubmed: 30919622
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00021
Schweppe, D. K. et al. Characterization and optimization of multiplexed quantitative analyses using high-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91, 4010–4016 (2019).
pubmed: 30672687
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05399
Kuilman, T. et al. CopywriteR: DNA copy number detection from off-target sequence data. Genome Biol. 16, 49 (2015).
pubmed: 25887352
pmcid: 4396974
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0617-1
Mermel, C. H. et al. GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol. 12, R41 (2011).
pubmed: 3218867
pmcid: 3218867
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
pubmed: 3163565
pmcid: 3163565
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323
Yoshihara, K. et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat. Commun. 4, 2612 (2013).
pubmed: 3826632
pmcid: 3826632
doi: 10.1038/ncomms3612
Newman, A. M. et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 12, 453–457 (2015).
pubmed: 25822800
pmcid: 4739640
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337
Aran, D., Hu, Z. & Butte, A. J. xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape. Genome Biol. 18, 220 (2017).
pubmed: 29141660
pmcid: 5688663
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1349-1