A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.


Journal

Nature human behaviour
ISSN: 2397-3374
Titre abrégé: Nat Hum Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697750

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 25 03 2019
accepted: 13 12 2019
pubmed: 29 1 2020
medline: 18 7 2020
entrez: 29 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size-and at times, direction-of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change-willingness to work in solidarity- that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31988440
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
pii: 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

380-386

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Allport, G. W. The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, 1954).
Schofield, J. W. School desegregation and intergroup relations: a review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 17, 335–409 (1991).
Lemmer, G. & Wagner, U. Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 4, 152–168 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2079
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 751–783 (2006).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwär, G. & Heath, A. An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among black and white students in South Africa. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 606–627 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075.x
Dixon, J., Durrheim, K. & Tredoux, C. Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychol. Sci. 18, 867–872 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x
Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F. & Pratto, F. The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychol. Sci. 20, 114–121 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
Wright, S. C. & Lubensky, M. E. in Intergroup Misunderstandings: Impact of Divergent Social Realities (eds Demoulin, S. et al.) 291–310 (Psychology Press, 2009).
Kamberi, E., Martinovic, B. & Verkuyten, M. Intergroup contact and minority group empowerment: the perspective of Roma and non-Roma adolescents in Macedonia. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27, 424–434 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/casp.2320
Reimer, N. K. et al. Intergroup contact and social change. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4, 121–136 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0146167216676478
Tropp, L. R. & Barlow, F. K. Making advantaged racial groups care about racial inequality: intergroup contact as a route to psychological investment. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 194–199 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/0963721417743282
Jackman, M. R. & Crane, M. ‘Some of my best friends are Black’: interracial friendship and Whites’ racial attitudes. Public Opin. Q. 50, 459–486 (1986).
doi: 10.1086/268998
Van Stekelenburg, J. & Klandermans, B. The social psychology of protest. Curr. Sociol. 61, 886–905 (2013).
doi: 10.1177/0011392113479314
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. & Spears, R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychol. Bull. 134, 504–535 (2008).
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
Droogendyk, L., Louis, W. R. & Wright, S. C. Renewed promise for positive cross-group contact: the role of supportive contact in empowering collective action. Can. J. Behav. Sci. Rev. Can. Sci. Comport. 48, 317–327 (2016).
doi: 10.1037/cbs0000058
Patel, C. J., Burford, B. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 68, 1046–1058 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.029
Rubin, D. Meta-analysis: literature synthesis or effect-size surface estimation? J. Educ. Stat. 17, 363–374 (1992).
doi: 10.3102/10769986017004363
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A. & Vanpaemel, W. Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 702–712 (2016).
doi: 10.1177/1745691616658637
Nosek, B. A. et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science 348, 1422–1425 (2015).
doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374
Alba, R., & Foner, N. Strangers No More: Immigration and the Challenges of Integration in North America and Western Europe (Princeton Univ. Press, 2015).
Herek, G. M. & McLemore, K. A. Sexual prejudice. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 309–333 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826
Discrimination and Violence Against Individuals Based On Their Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity A/HRC/29/23 (UN Human Rights Council, 2015); http://www.refworld.org/docid/5571577c4.html
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P. & Nelson, L. D. Specification curve: descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. Preprint at SSRN http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2694998 (2015).
Benjamini, Y. & Yekutieli, D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29, 1165–1188 (2001).
doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998
Tausch, N., Saguy, T. & Bryson, J. How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. J. Soc. Issues 71, 536–553 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/josi.12127
Ufkes, E. G., Dovidio, J. F. & Tel, G. Identity and collective action among European Kurds. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 54, 176–186 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12084
Saguy, T. Downside of intergroup harmony?: When reconciliation might backfire and what to do. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 75–81 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2372732217747085
Fingerhut, A. W. Straight allies: what predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41, 2230–2248 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00807.x
Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J. & Turner, J. C. The political solidarity model of social change: dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 12, 330–352 (2008).
doi: 10.1177/1088868308323223
Pettigrew, T. F. & Hewstone, M. The single factor fallacy: implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 8–37 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/sipr.12026
Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E. & Zhou, S. Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39, 442–455 (2013).
doi: 10.1177/0146167213477155
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. & Louis, W. R. Acting in solidarity: cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. J. Soc. Issues 72, 315–334 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/josi.12168
Tankard, M. E. & Paluck, E. L. The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1334–1344 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0956797617709594
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–135 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Auteurs

Tabea Hässler (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. tabea.haessler@uzh.ch.

Johannes Ullrich (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Michelle Bernardino (M)

School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Nurit Shnabel (N)

The School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Colette Van Laar (CV)

Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Daniel Valdenegro (D)

School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Simone Sebben (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Linda R Tropp (LR)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

Emilio Paolo Visintin (EP)

Department of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Roberto González (R)

School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Ruth K Ditlmann (RK)

Migration, Integration and Transnationalization Department, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany.

Dominic Abrams (D)

School of Psychology, University of Kent, Kent, UK.

Hema Preya Selvanathan (HP)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Marija Branković (M)

Department of Psychology, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.

Stephen Wright (S)

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Jorina von Zimmermann (J)

Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Michael Pasek (M)

Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA.
ARTIS International, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Anna Lisa Aydin (AL)

Department of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Iris Žeželj (I)

Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Adrienne Pereira (A)

Department of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Nóra Anna Lantos (NA)

Department of Social Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Mario Sainz (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.

Andreas Glenz (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Hana Oberpfalzerová (H)

Institute of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Michal Bilewicz (M)

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Anna Kende (A)

Department of Social Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Olga Kuzawinska (O)

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Sabine Otten (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Edona Maloku (E)

Social Sciences Unit, Rochester Institute of Technology in Kosovo, Pristina, Kosovo.

Masi Noor (M)

Department of Psychology, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.

Pelin Gul (P)

Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Jessica Pistella (J)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Roberto Baiocco (R)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Margareta Jelic (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Evgeny Osin (E)

Department of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Orly Bareket (O)

The School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Dinka Corkalo Biruski (DC)

Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Jonathan E Cook (JE)

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Maneeza Dawood (M)

Department of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA.

Lisa Droogendyk (L)

School of Social and Life Sciences, Sheridan College, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.

Angélica Herrera Loyo (AH)

Department of Informatics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Kaltrina Kelmendi (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Pristina, Pristina, Kosovo.

Luiza Mugnol Ugarte (LM)

Department of Psychology, D'OR Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH