Comparative apical sealing evaluation of two bioceramic endodontic sealers.
bioceramics
endodontic filling material
scanning electronic microscopy
sealing ability
Journal
Medicine and pharmacy reports
ISSN: 2668-0572
Titre abrégé: Med Pharm Rep
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101742144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
03
07
2019
revised:
16
09
2019
accepted:
16
10
2019
entrez:
29
1
2020
pubmed:
29
1
2020
medline:
29
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current study aims to evaluate, using scanning electronic microscopy, the sealing ability of two bioceramic endodontic sealers, one consecrated and one experimental. Twenty monoradicular teeth were included in the study. The teeth were endodontically prepared at the working length. The shaping and cleaning involved the use of chelating gel MM EDTA 19% and continuous irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2.5%. The radicular filling was performed using gutta-percha in association with a sealer. Ten teeth were filled with consecrated endodontic filling material and the others ten with the experimental bioceramic based sealer. The evaluation of the sealers using SEM analysis allowed the identification and the measurement of gaps on the radicular dentin/sealer interface and the degree of apical sealing ability. No significant statistical difference was observed between the gap dimensions in the three areas for the tested bioceramic materials (p<0.005). In the apical region a homogenous layer with extensions intersecting the hybrid layer was observed when the experimental bioceramic sealer was used. In case of teeth filled with commercial sealer, peripheral hybrid extended areas were identified. The two bioceramic sealers presented similar apical sealing. Gaps were identified in both sealers but also the presence of hybrid layer was identified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31989110
doi: 10.15386/mpr-1516
pii: cm-92-s55
pmc: PMC6978926
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S55-S60Références
J Endod. 2005 Feb;31(2):91-6
pubmed: 15671816
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):e96-102
pubmed: 20417137
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):3D-18D
pubmed: 11763917
Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9753210
pubmed: 27242904
Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):99-103
pubmed: 25834592
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):83-8
pubmed: 25829682
J Dent Res. 2008 Oct;87(10):974-9
pubmed: 18809754
J Endod. 2006 Aug;32(8):762-5
pubmed: 16861078
J Endod. 1995 Jun;21(6):295-9
pubmed: 7673836
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Mar 01;10(2):75-82
pubmed: 19279975
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):247-51
pubmed: 26069414
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Jun;53(6):614-21
pubmed: 7048189
J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):514-9
pubmed: 15980711
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S450-S456
pubmed: 31198386
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Aug;112(2):e74-7
pubmed: 21507688
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):38-42
pubmed: 28179922
J Endod. 1994 Apr;20(4):159-63
pubmed: 8035153
Stomatologija. 2009;11(1):21-5
pubmed: 19423967
Minerva Stomatol. 2008 Jun;57(6):295-300
pubmed: 18617877
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Mar;8(3):243-5
pubmed: 24783148
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):944-7
pubmed: 17878079
J Oral Sci. 2012 Mar;54(1):99-104
pubmed: 22466893