Measuring community norms around women's empowerment in the West Bank: Opportunities and challenges of a novel approach using cultural consensus.
Cultural consensus
Culture
Development
Gender
Gender-based violence
Palestine
Journal
SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
20
09
2018
revised:
12
01
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
entrez:
30
1
2020
pubmed:
30
1
2020
medline:
30
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding cultural norms is essential to achieving results in development interventions and preventing interventions from causing unintended negative consequences. However, capturing norms within everyday contexts in ways that can be monitored and evaluated can be expensive and time consuming and is not always feasible. We tested a novel method, the cultural consensus analysis (CCA), in the context of monitoring and evaluating a United States Agency for International Development (USAID) justice project in the West Bank, Palestine. We conducted 392 survey interviews with men and women, using 60 true or false questions in the knowledge domains of women's empowerment and gender-based violence (GBV), and tested three gender propositions using CCA. We found no singular cultural understanding of women's empowerment and GBV across West Bank Palestinians (proposition 1). Distinctive cultural models for women and other subgroups (e.g., those living in villages, women who identified as discriminated against within Palestinian society) exist, although there were no shared cultural models among men of any subgroup (proposition 2). Program assumptions regarding structural barriers to women's empowerment conformed to the women's cultural models (proposition 3). To our knowledge, this is the first application of CCA as an approach for describing gender norms in international development programming. CCA was able to distinguish subtle cultural patterns, including between population subgroups, and to identify how those are associated with specific risks, such as GBV. We conclude that CCA is a potentially useful approach for development practice, to ground-truth program assumptions and, potentially, to track program impacts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31993484
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100489
pii: S2352-8273(18)30256-8
pii: 100489
pmc: PMC6978481
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100489Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Références
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;41(4):480-498
pubmed: 28378037
Glob Public Health. 2013;8(1):13-36
pubmed: 23320921
Med Anthropol Q. 2017 Jun;31(2):177-197
pubmed: 27112930
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Mar;30(3):215-29
pubmed: 16519938
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1580-9
pubmed: 25467578