Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment.


Journal

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 18 09 2019
accepted: 14 01 2020
pubmed: 30 1 2020
medline: 23 10 2020
entrez: 30 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Family-building after gonadotoxic treatment often requires in vitro fertilization, surrogacy, or adoption, with associated challenges such as uncertain likelihood of success, high costs, and complicated laws regulating surrogacy and adoption. This study examined adolescent and young adult female (AYA-F) survivors' experiences and decision-making related to family-building after cancer. Semi-structured interviews explored fertility and family-building themes (N = 25). Based on an a priori conceptual model, hypothesis coding and grounded theory coding methods guided qualitative analysis. Participants averaged 29 years old (SD = 6.2) were mostly White and educated. Four major themes were identified: sources of uncertainty, cognitive and emotional reactions, coping behaviors, and decision-making. Uncertainty stemmed from medical, personal, social, and financial factors, which led to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to reduce distress, renegotiate identity, adjust expectations, and consider "next steps" toward family-building goals. Most AYA-Fs were unaware of their fertility status, felt uninformed about family-building options, and worried about expected challenges. Despite feeling that "action" was needed, many were stalled in decision-making to evaluate fertility or address information needs; postponement and avoidance were common. Younger AYA-Fs tended to be less concerned. AYA-Fs reported considerable uncertainty, distress, and unmet needs surrounding family-building decisions post-treatment. Support services are needed to better educate patients and provide opportunity for referral and early preparation for potential challenges. Reproductive counseling should occur throughout survivorship care to address medical, psychosocial, and financial difficulties, allow time for informed decision-making, and the opportunity to prepare for barriers such as high costs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31993754
doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05307-1
pii: 10.1007/s00520-020-05307-1
pmc: PMC7384920
mid: NIHMS1553267
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4857-4867

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R03 CA212924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R03CA212924
Pays : United States

Références

van Dijk M, van den Berg MH, Overbeek A, Lambalk CB, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Tissing WJ, Kremer LC, van der Pal H, Loonen JJ, Versluys B, Bresters D, Kaspers GJL, van Leeuwen F, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, DCOG LATER-VEVO study group (2018) Reproductive intentions and use of reproductive health care among female survivors of childhood cancer. Hum Reprod 33:1167–1174
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey058
Zebrack BJ, Block R, Hayes-Lattin B, Embry L, Aguilar C, Meeske KA, Li Y, Butler M, Cole S (2013) Psychosocial service use and unmet need among recently diagnosed adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Cancer 119:201–214
doi: 10.1002/cncr.27713
Keegan THM, Lichtensztajn DY, Kato I, Kent EE, Wu XC, West MM, Hamilton AS, Zebrack B, Bellizzi KM, Smith AW, AYA HOPE Study Collaborative Group (2012) Unmet adolescent and young adult cancer survivors information and service needs: a population-based cancer registry study. J Cancer Surviv 6:239–250
doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0219-9
Gorman JR, Su HI, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2015) Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression. Cancer 121:935–942
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29133
Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML et al (2015) If you did not document it, it did not happen: rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients’ medical records. J Oncol Pract 11:137–144
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.000786
Lewin J, Ma JMZ, Mitchell L, Tam S, Puri N, Stephens D, Srikanthan A, Bedard P, Razak A, Crump M, Warr D, Giuliani M, Gupta A (2017) The positive effect of a dedicated adolescent and young adult fertility program on the rates of documentation of therapy-associated infertility risk and fertility preservation options. Support Care Cancer 25:1915–1922
doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3597-8
Kim J, Mersereau JE, Su HI, Whitcomb BW, Malcarne VL, Gorman JR (2016) Young female cancer survivors’ use of fertility care after completing cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer 24:3191–3199
doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3138-x
Shay LA, Parsons HM, Vernon SW (2017) Survivorship care planning and unmet information and service needs among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 6:327–332
doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0053
Jukkala AM, Azuero A, McNees P, Bates GW, Meneses K (2010) Self-assessed knowledge of treatment and fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 94:2396–2398
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.043
Gorman JR, Whitcomb BW, Standridge D, Malcarne VL, Romero SA, Roberts SA, Su HI (2017) Adoption consideration and concerns among young adult female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 11:149–157
doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0572-1
Wang Y, Anazodo A, Logan S (2019) Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients. Psychooncology 28:459–467
doi: 10.1002/pon.4961
Logan S, Perz J, Ussher JM, Peate M, Anazodo A (2018) A systematic review of patient oncofertility support needs in reproductive cancer patients aged 14 to 45 years of age. Psychooncology 27:401–409
doi: 10.1002/pon.4502
Donovan EE, Brown LE, LeFebvre L, Tardif S, Love B (2015) ‘The uncertainty is what is driving me crazy’: the tripartite model of uncertainty in the adolescent and young adult cancer context. Health Commun 30:702–713
doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.898193
Cameron LD, Biesecker BB, Peters E et al (2017) Self-regulation principles underlying risk perception and decision making within the context of genomic testing. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 11:e12315. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12315
doi: 10.1111/spc3.12315 pubmed: 29225669 pmcid: 5716481
Clark NM, Gong M, Kaciroti N (2014) A model of self-regulation for control of chronic disease. Health Educ Behav 41:499–508
doi: 10.1177/1090198114547701
Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E (2016) The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med 39:935–946
doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2
Diefenbach MA, Leventhal H (1996) The common-sense model of illness representation: theoretical and practical considerations. J Soc Distress Homeless 5:11–38
doi: 10.1007/BF02090456
Shay LA, Schmidt S, Cornell SD, Parsons HM (2018) ‘Making my own decisions sometimes’: a pilot study of young adult cancer survivors’ perspectives on medical decision-making. J Cancer Educ 33:1341–1346
doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1256-x
Benedict C, Thom BN, Friedman D et al (2016) Young adult female cancer survivors’ unmet information needs and reproductive concerns contribute to decisional conflict regarding posttreatment fertility preservation. Cancer 122:2101–2109
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29917
Saldana J (2012) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Benedict C, McLeggon J-A, Thom B et al (2018) ‘Creating a family after battling cancer is exhausting and maddening’: exploring real-world experiences of young adult cancer survivors seeking financial assistance for family building after treatment. Psychooncology 27:2829–2839
doi: 10.1002/pon.4898
Benedict C, Shuk E, Ford JS (2016) Fertility issues in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 5:48–57
doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0024
Gorman JR, Bailey S, Pierce JP, Su HI (2012) How do you feel about fertility and parenthood? The voices of young female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6:200–209
doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0211-9
Schover LR. (2005) Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2–5
Halliday LE, Boughton MA (2011) Exploring the concept of uncertain fertility, reproduction and motherhood after cancer in young adult women. Nurs Inq 18:135–142
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00532.x
Garvelink MM, Boland L, Klein K, Nguyen DV, Menear M, Bekker HL, Eden KB, LeBlanc A, O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Légaré F (2019) Decisional conflict scale findings among patients and surrogates making health decisions: part II of an anniversary review. Med Decis Mak 39:315–326
doi: 10.1177/0272989X19881551
O’Connor A Ottawa Decision Support Framework, https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/odsf.html . Accessed 5 Sept 2019
O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D (2002) An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 31:570–581
doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00083.x
Ehrbar V, Urech C, Tschudin S (2018) Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions. Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care 3:113–119
doi: 10.1080/23809000.2018.1503539
Müller M, Urech C, Boivin J, Ehrbar V, Moffat R, Daellenbach RZ, Rochlitz C, Tschudin S (2018) Addressing decisional conflict about fertility preservation: helping young female cancer survivors’ family planning decisions. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 44:175–180
doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101820
Rubinsak LA, Christianson MS, Akers A, Carter J, Kaunitz AM, Temkin SM (2019) Reproductive health care across the lifecourse of the female cancer patient. Support Care Cancer 27:23–32
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4360-5
Murphy D, Klosky JL, Reed DR, Termuhlen AM, Shannon SV, Quinn GP (2015) The importance of assessing priorities of reproductive health concerns among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. Cancer 121:2529–2536
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29466
Murphy D, Orgel E, Termuhlen A et al (2013) Why healthcare providers should focus on the fertility of AYA cancer survivors: it’s not too late! Front Oncol 3:248
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00248
Benedict C, Hahn AL, Diefenbach MA, et al. Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases (in press). Digital Health

Auteurs

Catherine Benedict (C)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. cbenedict@stanford.edu.

Alexandria L Hahn (AL)

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, USA.

Alyssa McCready (A)

Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Joanne F Kelvin (JF)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Michael Diefenbach (M)

Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Jennifer S Ford (JS)

Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH