Two different posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA designs: navigator evaluation of intraoperative kinematic differences.
Comparison
Kinematics
Knee laxity
Navigation
Posterior-stabilized knee
TKA
Journal
Musculoskeletal surgery
ISSN: 2035-5114
Titre abrégé: Musculoskelet Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101498346
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
10
01
2020
accepted:
23
01
2020
pubmed:
30
1
2020
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
30
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare two types of posterior-stabilized (PS) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The hypothesis was that no major differences were going to be found among the two TKA designs. Two cohorts of patients who were divided according to implant design (Cohort A, new design gradually reducing radius PS MB TKA; Cohort B, traditional dual-radius PS MB TKA) were analyzed by means of intraoperative navigation. All operations were guided by a non-image-based navigation system that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during the following kinematic tests: passive range of motion (PROM), varus-valgus stress test at 0° and 30° (VV0, VV30) and anterior/posterior drawer test at 90° of flexion (AP90). There were no significative differences in kinematic tests between the two implants. Cohort A, however, showed a different post-implant trend for VV0 and VV30 that were lower than the pre-implant ones, as expected, while for Cohort B, the trend is opposite. However, the gradually reducing radius prosthesis (Cohort A) showed a trend of improving stability (29% compared to the preoperative status) in mid-flexion (VV30) which the traditional dual-radius design (Cohort B) would not. Moreover, we found no differences among postoperative results of the two TKA designs. Despite design variations, no difference has been found among the prostheses in terms of PROM, rotations and translations. Both design kinematics did not show paradoxical external rotations, but an increase in femoral translation in mid-flexion without affecting the functioning of the prosthesis. II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31993972
doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00643-1
pii: 10.1007/s12306-020-00643-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173-181Informations de copyright
© 2020. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
Références
Baier C, Springorum HR, Götz J, Schaumburger J, Lüring C, Grifka J, Beckmann J (2013) Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant. Int Orthop 37:407–414
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1798-4
Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Martelli S, Bruni D, Marcacci M (2008) Accuracy, reliability, and repeatability of navigation systems in clinical practice. Oper Techn Orthop 18:154–157
doi: 10.1053/j.oto.2008.11.001
Bignozzi S, Zaffagnini S, Akkawi I, Marko T, Bruni D, Neri MP, Colle F, Marcacci M (2014) Three different cruciate-sacrificing TKA designs: minor intraoperative kinematic differences and negligible clinical differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3113–3120
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3200-5
Bontempi M, Cardinale U, Bragonzoni L, Macchiarola L, Grassi A, Signorelli C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Zaffagnini S (2017) Total knee replacement: intraoperative and postoperative kinematic assessment. Acta Biomedica 88:32–37
pubmed: 28657561
pmcid: 6179007
Capella M, Dolfin M, Saccia F (2016) Mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 4:127
doi: 10.21037/atm.2015.12.64
Carey BW, Harty J (2018) A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res 13:54
doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0757-6
Casino D, Zaffagnini S, Martelli S, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Iacono F, Russo A, Marcacci M (2009) Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: kinematic assessment with a navigation system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:369
doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0699-3
Clarke JV, Deakin AH, Picard F, Riches PE (2017) Lower limb alignment and laxity measures before, during and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Clin Biomech 47:61–65
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.013
Clary CW, Fitzpatrick CK, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2013) The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. J Biomech 46:1351–1357
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.025
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:47–57
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00009
Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86:963–974
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012
Fantozzi S, Catani F, Ensini A, Leardini A, Giannini S (2006) Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 24:2222–2229
doi: 10.1002/jor.20306
Fitzpatrick CK, Clary CW, Rullkoetter PJ (2012) The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. J Biomech 45:2092–2102
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.035
Fritzsche H, Beyer F, Postler A, Lützner J (2017) Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1–6
Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136
doi: 10.1115/1.3138397
Hino K, Kutsuna T, Watamori K, Ishimaru Y, Kiyomatsu H, Shiraishi Y, Miura H (2018) Bi-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty provides varus–valgus stability throughout the midflexion range. Knee 25:897–902
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.06.006
Huang C-H, Liau J-J, Cheng C-K (2007) Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2:1
doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-1
Indelli PF, Marcucci M, Pipino G, Charlton S, Carulli C, Innocenti M (2014) The effects of femoral component design on the patello-femoral joint in a PS total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:59–64
doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1877-4
Kremers MH, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ (2015) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg 97:1386–1397
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141
Li G, Most E, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Zayontz S, Johnson T, Rubash H (2002) Biomechanics of posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:214–225
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00035
Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Bontempi M, Marcacci M (2006) Validation of a new protocol for computer-assisted evaluation of kinematics of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech 21:279–287
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.009
Nemes S, Rolfson O, W-Dahl A, Garellick G, Sundberg M, Kärrholm J, Robertsson O (2015) Historical view and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden. Acta Orthop 86:426–431
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1034608
Ranawat CS, Komistek RD, Rodriguez JA, Dennis DA, Anderle M (2004) In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:184–190
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00030
Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS (2017) Clinical and radiographic results of attune and PFC sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplas 32:431–436
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.021
Singh JA (2011) Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J 5:80–85
doi: 10.2174/1874325001105010080
Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL (2006) Intraoperative passive kinematics of osteoarthritic knees before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 24:1607–1614
doi: 10.1002/jor.20163
Tjørnild M, Søballe K, Hansen PM, Holm C, Stilling M (2015) Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacement. Acta Orthop 86:208–214
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.968476
Ünkar EA, Öztürkmen Y, Şükür E, Çarkçi E, Mert M (2017) Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turcica 51:95–99
doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.12.008
Young KL, Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Wilson JLA (2015) Intraoperative passive knee kinematics during total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Orthop Res 33:1611–1619
doi: 10.1002/jor.22945