Patients with positive malaria tests not given artemisinin-based combination therapies: a research synthesis describing under-prescription of antimalarial medicines in Africa.
ACT
Antibiotic
Antimalarial
Case management
Diagnosis
Fever case management
Malaria
Prescribing
Prescription
Rapid diagnostic test
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2020
30 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2019
accepted:
17
12
2019
entrez:
31
1
2020
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
19
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There has been a successful push towards parasitological diagnosis of malaria in Africa, mainly with rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), which has reduced over-prescribing of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACT) to malaria test-negative patients. The effect on prescribing for test-positive patients has received much less attention. Malaria infection in endemic Africa is often most dangerous for young children and those in low-transmission settings. This study examined non-prescription of antimalarials for patients with malaria infection demonstrated by positive mRDT results, and in particular these groups who are most vulnerable to poor outcomes if antimalarials are not given. Analysis of data from 562,762 patients in 8 studies co-designed as part of the ACT Consortium, conducted 2007-2013 in children and adults, in Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda, in a variety of public and private health care sector settings, and across a range of malaria endemic zones. Of 106,039 patients with positive mRDT results (median age 6 years), 7426 (7.0%) were not prescribed an ACT antimalarial. The proportion of mRDT-positive patients not prescribed ACT ranged across sites from 1.3 to 37.1%. For patients under age 5 years, 3473/44,539 (7.8%) were not prescribed an ACT, compared with 3833/60,043 (6.4%) of those aged ≥ 5 years. The proportion of < 5-year-olds not prescribed ACT ranged up to 41.8% across sites. The odds of not being prescribed an ACT were 2-32 times higher for patients in settings with lower-transmission intensity (using test positivity as a proxy) compared to areas of higher transmission. mRDT-positive children in low-transmission settings were especially likely not to be prescribed ACT, with proportions untreated up to 70%. Of the 7426 mRDT-positive patients not prescribed an ACT, 4121 (55.5%) were prescribed other, non-recommended non-ACT antimalarial medications, and the remainder (44.5%) were prescribed no antimalarial. In eight studies of mRDT implementation in five African countries, substantial proportions of patients testing mRDT-positive were not prescribed an ACT antimalarial, and many were not prescribed an antimalarial at all. Patients most vulnerable to serious outcomes, children < 5 years and those in low-transmission settings, were most likely to not be prescribed antimalarials, and young children in low-transmission settings were least likely to be treated for malaria. This major public health risk must be addressed in training and practice. Reported in individual primary studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There has been a successful push towards parasitological diagnosis of malaria in Africa, mainly with rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), which has reduced over-prescribing of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACT) to malaria test-negative patients. The effect on prescribing for test-positive patients has received much less attention. Malaria infection in endemic Africa is often most dangerous for young children and those in low-transmission settings. This study examined non-prescription of antimalarials for patients with malaria infection demonstrated by positive mRDT results, and in particular these groups who are most vulnerable to poor outcomes if antimalarials are not given.
METHODS
METHODS
Analysis of data from 562,762 patients in 8 studies co-designed as part of the ACT Consortium, conducted 2007-2013 in children and adults, in Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda, in a variety of public and private health care sector settings, and across a range of malaria endemic zones.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 106,039 patients with positive mRDT results (median age 6 years), 7426 (7.0%) were not prescribed an ACT antimalarial. The proportion of mRDT-positive patients not prescribed ACT ranged across sites from 1.3 to 37.1%. For patients under age 5 years, 3473/44,539 (7.8%) were not prescribed an ACT, compared with 3833/60,043 (6.4%) of those aged ≥ 5 years. The proportion of < 5-year-olds not prescribed ACT ranged up to 41.8% across sites. The odds of not being prescribed an ACT were 2-32 times higher for patients in settings with lower-transmission intensity (using test positivity as a proxy) compared to areas of higher transmission. mRDT-positive children in low-transmission settings were especially likely not to be prescribed ACT, with proportions untreated up to 70%. Of the 7426 mRDT-positive patients not prescribed an ACT, 4121 (55.5%) were prescribed other, non-recommended non-ACT antimalarial medications, and the remainder (44.5%) were prescribed no antimalarial.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In eight studies of mRDT implementation in five African countries, substantial proportions of patients testing mRDT-positive were not prescribed an ACT antimalarial, and many were not prescribed an antimalarial at all. Patients most vulnerable to serious outcomes, children < 5 years and those in low-transmission settings, were most likely to not be prescribed antimalarials, and young children in low-transmission settings were least likely to be treated for malaria. This major public health risk must be addressed in training and practice.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Reported in individual primary studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31996199
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1483-6
pii: 10.1186/s12916-019-1483-6
pmc: PMC6990477
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimalarials
0
Artemisinins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17Références
Malar J. 2008 Sep 19;7:181
pubmed: 18803833
Malar J. 2012 Jul 02;11:221
pubmed: 22747655
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):735
pubmed: 31640676
PLoS Med. 2014 Aug 05;11(8):e1001688
pubmed: 25093720
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 06;6(4):e18419
pubmed: 21494674
Implement Sci. 2012 Jan 23;7:5
pubmed: 22269037
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jan 11;2(1):e000067
pubmed: 28588992
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Mar;29(2):257-65
pubmed: 23503101
Malar J. 2014 Dec 17;13:502
pubmed: 25519710
Malar J. 2013 Sep 21;12:334
pubmed: 24053679
BMJ. 2016 Feb 04;352:i107
pubmed: 26846146
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 13;12(3):e0170998
pubmed: 28288172
Malar J. 2007 May 04;6:55
pubmed: 17480216
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 16;3(6):e000915
pubmed: 30498587
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Oct;18(10):1269-82
pubmed: 23937722
BMC Med. 2015 May 15;13:118
pubmed: 25980737
Malar J. 2011 Aug 03;10:218
pubmed: 21812948
Malar J. 2017 Jan 23;16(1):40
pubmed: 28114942
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0173093
pubmed: 28253315
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e346-58
pubmed: 25103303
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0129545
pubmed: 26200467
Malar J. 2010 Apr 14;9:95
pubmed: 20398262
BMJ. 2010 Mar 05;340:c930
pubmed: 20207689
BMJ. 2017 Mar 29;356:j1054
pubmed: 28356302
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e19753
pubmed: 21750697
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115440
pubmed: 25541703
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Oct;97(4):1170-1179
pubmed: 28820705
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Apr;5(4):e418-e427
pubmed: 28288746
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0116856
pubmed: 25692568
Malar J. 2011 May 20;10:136
pubmed: 21599880
Malar J. 2013 Aug 26;12:293
pubmed: 23977904
Malar J. 2017 Jan 3;16(1):6
pubmed: 28049481
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0133832
pubmed: 26309023
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48296
pubmed: 23152766
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Sep;13(9):1131-42
pubmed: 18631313
Public Health Action. 2013 Jun 21;3(2):118-24
pubmed: 26393013
Malar J. 2011 Jun 09;10:158
pubmed: 21651827
Trends Parasitol. 2013 Apr;29(4):164-80
pubmed: 23415933
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Sep;21(9):1157-70
pubmed: 27383558
Malar J. 2011 Aug 18;10:243
pubmed: 21851625
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202031
pubmed: 30092043
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 18;17(1):470
pubmed: 28521798
JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1461-70
pubmed: 15784869
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;33(5):1080-91
pubmed: 15256523
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 03;9(12):e0004040
pubmed: 26633014
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):828
pubmed: 27538947
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 8;7(3):e012973
pubmed: 28274962
J Vector Borne Dis. 2013 Dec;50(4):271-7
pubmed: 24499849