The burden of chronic diseases across Europe: what policies and programs to address diabetes? A SWOT analysis.
SWOT analysis
diabetes programmes
governance
healthcare
intersectoral collaboration
non-communicable diseases
policy
stakeholder participation
Journal
Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jan 2020
29 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2019
accepted:
20
12
2019
entrez:
31
1
2020
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Promoting the well-being at all ages and reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is a major target of the Sustainable Development Goals. In the frame of the JA-CHRODIS, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted to provide different countries' insights on what makes a policy/programme addressing NCDs applicable, sustainable and effective, with a focus on diabetes. A qualitative study has been performed using a SWOT analysis on policies/programmes at the national/federal or subnational level. By March 2016, 14 SWOTs were conducted involving 11 European countries and 57 stakeholders and Ministries of Health, reporting and analysing a total of 44 policies. The main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats have been outlined as well as and the main areas for governance improvement. A binding trans-sectoral approach is necessary to tackle the underlying risk factors of inequalities. The culture of disease prevention and health promotion is still low while the biomedical paradigm prevails. A systematic gender perspective is still missing. Sharing and exchange of best practices, as sponsored by the European Commission, is acting as a motivator. The SWOT analyses draw an overall picture of the complexity of designing and implementing good policies and programmes that are tailored to local needs. These results may apply to any context and can be used by decision-makers, managers, professionals and other stakeholders to focus on key issues, recognising areas for attention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Promoting the well-being at all ages and reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is a major target of the Sustainable Development Goals. In the frame of the JA-CHRODIS, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted to provide different countries' insights on what makes a policy/programme addressing NCDs applicable, sustainable and effective, with a focus on diabetes.
METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative study has been performed using a SWOT analysis on policies/programmes at the national/federal or subnational level.
RESULTS
RESULTS
By March 2016, 14 SWOTs were conducted involving 11 European countries and 57 stakeholders and Ministries of Health, reporting and analysing a total of 44 policies. The main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats have been outlined as well as and the main areas for governance improvement. A binding trans-sectoral approach is necessary to tackle the underlying risk factors of inequalities. The culture of disease prevention and health promotion is still low while the biomedical paradigm prevails. A systematic gender perspective is still missing. Sharing and exchange of best practices, as sponsored by the European Commission, is acting as a motivator.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The SWOT analyses draw an overall picture of the complexity of designing and implementing good policies and programmes that are tailored to local needs. These results may apply to any context and can be used by decision-makers, managers, professionals and other stakeholders to focus on key issues, recognising areas for attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31996237
doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0523-1
pii: 10.1186/s12961-019-0523-1
pmc: PMC6990580
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2015;51(3):183-6
pubmed: 26428040
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42-5
pubmed: 7613329