Metastatic role of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling activation by chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer.
Aged
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Movement
/ drug effects
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ adverse effects
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
/ drug effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Rectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Ribosomal Protein S6
/ genetics
Signal Transduction
/ drug effects
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
/ genetics
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
/ genetics
chemoradiotherapy
distant metastasis
epithelial-mesenchymal transition
mTOR
rectal cancer
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
18
09
2019
revised:
06
01
2020
accepted:
07
01
2020
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
23
4
2020
entrez:
31
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postoperative distant metastasis dramatically affects rectal cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). Here, we clarified the association between NACRT-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway activation and rectal cancer metastatic potential. We performed immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) and phosphorylated S6 (p-S6) on surgical specimen blocks from 98 rectal cancer patients after NACRT (cohort 1) and 80 colorectal cancer patients without NACRT (cohort 2). In addition, we investigated the association between mTOR pathway activity, affected by irradiation, and the migration ability of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Based on the results of the clinical study, p-mTOR was significantly overexpressed in cohort 1 (with NACRT) as compared to levels in cohort 2 (without NACRT) (P < .001). High p-mTOR and p-S6 levels correlated with the development of distant metastasis only in cohort 1. Specifically, high p-S6 expression (HR 4.51, P = .002) and high pathological T-stage (HR 3.73, P = .020) after NACRT were independent predictors of the development of distant metastasis. In vitro, p-S6 levels and migration ability increased after irradiation in SW480 cells (TP53 mutation-type) but decreased in LoVo cells (TP53 wild-type), suggesting that irradiation modulates mTOR signaling and migration through cell type-dependent mechanisms. We next assessed the expression level of p53 by immunostaining in cohort 1 and demonstrated that p-S6 was overexpressed in samples with high p53 expression as compared to levels in samples with low p53 expression (P = .008). In conclusion, p-S6 levels after NACRT correlate with postoperative distant metastasis in rectal cancer patients, suggesting that chemoradiotherapy might modulate the mTOR signaling pathway, promoting metastasis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31997546
doi: 10.1111/cas.14332
pmc: PMC7156826
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ribosomal Protein S6
0
TP53 protein, human
0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
MTOR protein, human
EC 2.7.1.1
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1291-1302Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17K10620
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17K 10621
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17K10623
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 18K07194
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 19K09114
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 19K09115
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP 19cm0106502
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Cancer Res. 2011 May 1;71(9):3246-56
pubmed: 21430067
Cancer Sci. 2020 Apr;111(4):1291-1302
pubmed: 31997546
Dis Markers. 2017;2017:1397063
pubmed: 28831205
J Clin Invest. 2010 Aug;120(8):2858-66
pubmed: 20664172
EMBO J. 2010 Sep 1;29(17):2994-3006
pubmed: 20657550
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016 Aug;73(16):2999-3007
pubmed: 27022944
J BUON. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):1457-1462
pubmed: 29332338
Cancer Sci. 2011 Jul;102(7):1257-63
pubmed: 21443690
Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 May;5(5):1183-9
pubmed: 16731750
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Jun 01;8(6):7009-15
pubmed: 26261591
Cell Cycle. 2013 Jan 1;12(1):20-5
pubmed: 23255104
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):963-70
pubmed: 23514584
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 26;7(30):47699-47710
pubmed: 27351224
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):184-90
pubmed: 24440473
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 15;19(14):3987-95
pubmed: 23743569
Oncol Rep. 2019 Jul;42(1):377-385
pubmed: 31059051
Radiat Res. 2011 Feb;175(2):214-24
pubmed: 21268715
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89
pubmed: 26189067
BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 10;16:207
pubmed: 26965179
Cell. 2017 Mar 9;168(6):960-976
pubmed: 28283069
Oncol Rep. 2012 Jan;27(1):51-7
pubmed: 21971767
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):575-82
pubmed: 21596621
BMC Cancer. 2014 May 28;14:376
pubmed: 24886512
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33
pubmed: 22529255
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;138(1):174-80
pubmed: 25913131
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jul;10(1):277-282
pubmed: 26171014
Cell Death Dis. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):e3019
pubmed: 28837154
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Nov;92(2):133-42
pubmed: 24908570
Neoplasia. 2006 Jun;8(6):458-64
pubmed: 16820091
Immunol Rev. 2017 Nov;280(1):249-279
pubmed: 29027221