Between trust and control: Teachers' assessment conceptualisations within programmatic assessment.


Journal

Medical education
ISSN: 1365-2923
Titre abrégé: Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7605655

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 09 09 2019
revised: 11 01 2020
accepted: 20 01 2020
pubmed: 31 1 2020
medline: 24 6 2021
entrez: 31 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Programmatic assessment attempts to facilitate learning through individual assessments designed to be of low-stakes and used only for high-stake decisions when aggregated. In practice, low-stake assessments have yet to reach their potential as catalysts for learning. We explored how teachers conceptualise assessments within programmatic assessment and how they engage with learners in assessment relationships. We used a constructivist grounded theory approach to explore teachers' assessment conceptualisations and assessment relationships in the context of programmatic assessment. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews at two different graduate-entry medical training programmes following a purposeful sampling approach. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively until we reached theoretical sufficiency. We identified themes using a process of constant comparison. Results showed that teachers conceptualise low-stake assessments in three different ways: to stimulate and facilitate learning; to prepare learners for the next step, and to use as feedback to gauge the teacher's own effectiveness. Teachers intended to engage in and preserve safe, yet professional and productive working relationships with learners to enable assessment for learning when securing high-quality performance and achievement of standards. When teachers' assessment conceptualisations were more focused on accounting conceptions, this risked creating tension in the teacher-learner assessment relationship. Teachers struggled between taking control and allowing learners' independence. Teachers believe programmatic assessment can have a positive impact on both teaching and student learning. However, teachers' conceptualisations of low-stake assessments are not focused solely on learning and also involve stakes for teachers. Sampling across different assessments and the introduction of progress committees were identified as important design features to support teachers and preserve the benefits of prolonged engagement in assessment relationships. These insights contribute to the design of effective implementations of programmatic assessment within the medical education context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31998987
doi: 10.1111/medu.14075
pmc: PMC7318263
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

528-537

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1492-1497
pubmed: 27028028
Med Educ. 2019 Apr;53(4):324-326
pubmed: 30815896
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):487-98
pubmed: 25924124
Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205-14
pubmed: 22364452
Med Teach. 2013 Jul;35(7):560-3
pubmed: 23641918
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Mar 16;12:9
pubmed: 22420839
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Dec;7(6):350-351
pubmed: 30406905
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):162-5
pubmed: 26221426
Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):493-502
pubmed: 17457074
Med Educ. 2016 Sep;50(9):933-42
pubmed: 27562893
Med Teach. 2012;34(3):215-20
pubmed: 22364453
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):276-84
pubmed: 27650373
Med Educ. 2020 Jun;54(6):528-537
pubmed: 31998987
Nurse Res. 2006 Jul 1;13(4):84
pubmed: 27702218
Med Educ. 2019 Jan;53(1):76-85
pubmed: 30073692
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17
pubmed: 15733167
Med Educ. 2016 Jul;50(7):704-6
pubmed: 27295472
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;55(1):1-20
pubmed: 26690541
Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):605-615
pubmed: 30723949
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):850-61
pubmed: 22913519
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Mar;20(1):229-45
pubmed: 24906462
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 11;13:123
pubmed: 24020944
Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478-85
pubmed: 21609177
Med Educ. 2015 Mar;49(3):307-20
pubmed: 25693990
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):654-663
pubmed: 29572920
Med Teach. 2016 Nov;38(11):1092-1099
pubmed: 27602533
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;31(4):434-444
pubmed: 30835560

Auteurs

Suzanne Schut (S)

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Sylvia Heeneman (S)

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Beth Bierer (B)

Education Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Erik Driessen (E)

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Jan van Tartwijk (J)

Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Cees van der Vleuten (C)

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH