Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study.
ICF
ICF rehabilitation set
Interrater reliability
Simple, intuitive descriptions
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2020
30 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
accepted:
14
01
2020
entrez:
1
2
2020
pubmed:
1
2
2020
medline:
8
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in 2001 and has been in the process of implementing it in clinics since then. Current international efforts to implement ICF in rehabilitation clinics include the implementation of ICF Core Sets and the development of simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set (also called Rehabilitation Set). The present study was designed to operationalize these ICF tools for clinical practice in Japan. This work included 1) the development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set, 2) the development of a rating reference guide for Activity and Participation categories, and 3) the examination of the interrater reliability of rating Activity and Participation categories. The Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set was developed following the process employed to develop the Chinese and Italian versions. For further operationalization of this ICF Set in practice, a rating reference guide was developed. The development of the rating reference guide involved the following steps: 1) a trial of rating patients by several raters, 2) cognitive interviewing of the raters to analyse the thinking process involved in rating, 3) drafting of the rating reference guide, and 4) review by ICF specialists to confirm consistency with the original ICF concepts. After the rating reference guide was developed, interrater reliability of the rating with the reference guide was determined. Interrater reliability was examined using weighted kappa statistics with linear weight. Through the pre-defined process, the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for 30 categories of the ICF Generic-30 Set and the rating reference guides for 21 Activity and Participation categories were successfully developed. The weighted kappa statistics ranged from 0.61 to 0.85, showing substantial to excellent agreement of the ratings between raters. The present study demonstrates that ICF categories can be translated into clinical practice. Collaboration between clinicians and researchers would further enhance the implementation of the ICF in Japan.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in 2001 and has been in the process of implementing it in clinics since then. Current international efforts to implement ICF in rehabilitation clinics include the implementation of ICF Core Sets and the development of simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set (also called Rehabilitation Set). The present study was designed to operationalize these ICF tools for clinical practice in Japan. This work included 1) the development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set, 2) the development of a rating reference guide for Activity and Participation categories, and 3) the examination of the interrater reliability of rating Activity and Participation categories.
METHODS
METHODS
The Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set was developed following the process employed to develop the Chinese and Italian versions. For further operationalization of this ICF Set in practice, a rating reference guide was developed. The development of the rating reference guide involved the following steps: 1) a trial of rating patients by several raters, 2) cognitive interviewing of the raters to analyse the thinking process involved in rating, 3) drafting of the rating reference guide, and 4) review by ICF specialists to confirm consistency with the original ICF concepts. After the rating reference guide was developed, interrater reliability of the rating with the reference guide was determined. Interrater reliability was examined using weighted kappa statistics with linear weight.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Through the pre-defined process, the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for 30 categories of the ICF Generic-30 Set and the rating reference guides for 21 Activity and Participation categories were successfully developed. The weighted kappa statistics ranged from 0.61 to 0.85, showing substantial to excellent agreement of the ratings between raters.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The present study demonstrates that ICF categories can be translated into clinical practice. Collaboration between clinicians and researchers would further enhance the implementation of the ICF in Japan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32000774
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6
pmc: PMC6993436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
66Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H30-statistics-general-003
Références
Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988;15:432-62
pubmed: 3239647
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):348-365
pubmed: 29791929
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1450-1457.e1
pubmed: 30557550
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Mar;60(3):517-24
pubmed: 22283236
Phys Ther. 2008 Jul;88(7):841-51
pubmed: 18483130
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Dec;24(12):1121-6
pubmed: 20713435
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Apr 18;50(4):309-316
pubmed: 28140419
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jul;24(7):1649-55
pubmed: 25997978
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;51(1):105-17
pubmed: 24686893
Brain Inj. 1994 Apr;8(3):197-210
pubmed: 8004079
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Apr 15;29(7):559-66
pubmed: 17453976
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun 13;48(6):508-14
pubmed: 27008067
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2135-41
pubmed: 20831726
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548
pubmed: 28988490
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 03;14:218
pubmed: 24588794
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):290-298
pubmed: 27858402
Disabil Rehabil. 1994 Apr-Jun;16(2):63-71
pubmed: 8043886
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84
pubmed: 26827829
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Aug;17(5):548-52
pubmed: 12952162
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:24-8
pubmed: 26363363
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Nov;26(6):533-45
pubmed: 23613480
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Aug;66(8):1078-84
pubmed: 17223659
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Dec;77(12):1226-32
pubmed: 8976303
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e021696
pubmed: 30552245
Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18
pubmed: 3503663
Health Policy. 1991 Sep;19(1):33-44
pubmed: 10117390
J Clin Med Res. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-9
pubmed: 26668676