Predictive factors of 5-year relapse-free survival in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: pooled analysis of two phase 2 trials.


Journal

British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
received: 25 03 2019
accepted: 17 01 2020
revised: 20 12 2019
pubmed: 1 2 2020
medline: 5 1 2021
entrez: 1 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Few data are available on survival and predictive factors in early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). This is a pooled analysis of two multicentre, randomised non-comparative phase 2 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant anastrozole and fulvestrant efficacy for postmenopausal HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients: HORGEN (NCT00871858) and CARMINA02 (NCT00629616) studies. In total, 236 patients were included in CARMINA02 and HORGEN trials. Modified intention-to-treat analysis was available for 217 patients. Median follow-up was 65.2 months. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 83.7% (95% CI: 77.9-88) and 92.7% (95% CI: 88.2-95.6), respectively, with no difference between treatment arms. On univariate analysis, tumour staging (T2 vs T3-4; p = 0.0001), Ki-67 at surgery (≤10% vs >10%; p = 0.0093), pathological tumour size (pT1-2 vs pT3-4; p = 0.0012) and node status (pN negative vs positive; p = 0.007), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0167) and PEPI score (PEPI group I + II vs III; p = 0.0004) were associated with RFS. No events were observed in patients with pathological response according to the Sataloff classification. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) group III was associated with significantly worse RFS (p = 0.0069, hazard ratio = 3.33 (95% CI: 1.39-7.98)). Postmenopausal HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients receiving NET generally have a favourable outcome. The PEPI score identifies a subset of patients of poorer prognosis who are candidates for further additional treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Few data are available on survival and predictive factors in early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET).
METHODS
This is a pooled analysis of two multicentre, randomised non-comparative phase 2 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant anastrozole and fulvestrant efficacy for postmenopausal HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients: HORGEN (NCT00871858) and CARMINA02 (NCT00629616) studies.
RESULTS
In total, 236 patients were included in CARMINA02 and HORGEN trials. Modified intention-to-treat analysis was available for 217 patients. Median follow-up was 65.2 months. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 83.7% (95% CI: 77.9-88) and 92.7% (95% CI: 88.2-95.6), respectively, with no difference between treatment arms. On univariate analysis, tumour staging (T2 vs T3-4; p = 0.0001), Ki-67 at surgery (≤10% vs >10%; p = 0.0093), pathological tumour size (pT1-2 vs pT3-4; p = 0.0012) and node status (pN negative vs positive; p = 0.007), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0167) and PEPI score (PEPI group I + II vs III; p = 0.0004) were associated with RFS. No events were observed in patients with pathological response according to the Sataloff classification. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) group III was associated with significantly worse RFS (p = 0.0069, hazard ratio = 3.33 (95% CI: 1.39-7.98)).
CONCLUSIONS
Postmenopausal HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients receiving NET generally have a favourable outcome. The PEPI score identifies a subset of patients of poorer prognosis who are candidates for further additional treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32001832
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0733-x
pii: 10.1038/s41416-020-0733-x
pmc: PMC7078275
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00871858', 'NCT00629616']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

759-765

Références

Cortazar, P., Zhang, L., Untch, M., Mehta, K., Costantino, J. P., Wolmark, N. et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384, 164–172 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8
Coates, A. S., Winer, E. P., Goldhirsch, A., Gelber, R. D., Gnant, M., Piccart-Gebhart, M. et al. Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann. Oncol. 26, 1533–1546 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221
Senkus, E., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rutgers, E. et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 26(Suppl. 5), v8–v30 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298
Spring, L. M., Gupta, A., Reynolds, K. L., Gadd, M. A., Ellisen, L. W., Isakoff, S. J. et al. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1477–1486 (2016).
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1897
Ellis, M. J., Tao, Y., Luo, J., A’Hern, R., Evans, D. B., Bhatnagar, A. S. et al. Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100, 1380–1388 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn309
Lerebours, F., Rivera, S., Mouret-Reynier, M. A., Alran, S., Venat-Bouvet, L. et al. Randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant trial evaluating anastrozole and fulvestrant efficacy for postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: results of the UNICANCER CARMINA 02 French trial (UCBG 0609). Cancer 122, 3032–3040 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30143
Dowsett, M., Smith, I. E., Ebbs, S. R., Dixon, J. M., Skene, A., A’Hern, R. et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 167–170 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk020
Dowsett, M., Ebbs, S. R., Dixon, J., Skene, A., Griffith, C., Boeddinghaus, I. et al. Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer—a study from the IMPACT trialists. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 2477–2492 (2005).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.559
Eiermann, W., Paepke, S., Appfelstaedt, J., Llombart-Cussac, A., Eremin, J., Vinholes, J. et al. Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann. Oncol. 12, 1527–1532 (2001).
doi: 10.1023/A:1013128213451
Smith, I. E., Dowsett, M., Ebbs, S. R., Dixon, J. M., Skene, A., Blohmer, J. U. et al. IMPACT Trialists Group. Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined With Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 5108–5116 (2005).
Quenel-Tueux, N., Debled, M., Rudewicz, J., MacGrogan, G., Pulido, M., Mauriac, L. et al. Clinical and genomic analysis of a randomised phase II study evaluating anastrozole and fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients treated for large operable or locally advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 113, 585–594 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.247
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L. et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 205–216 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
Sataloff, D. M., Mason, B. A., Prestipino, A. J., Seinige, U. L., Lieber, C. P. & Baloch, Z. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 180, 297–306 (1995).
pubmed: 7874340
Dowsett, M., Nielsen, T. O., A’Hern, R., Bartlett, J., Coombes, R. C., Cuzick, J. et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 inBreast Cancer Working Group. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103, 1656–1664 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr393
Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Cameron, D., Poortmans, P., Asselain, B., Azria, D., Cardoso, F. et al. Guidelines for time-to-event end point definitions in breast cancer trials: results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials). Ann. Oncol. 26, 2505–2506 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv478
Cataliotti, L., Buzdar, A. U., Noguchi, S., Bines, J., Takatsuka, Y., Petrakova, K. et al. Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. The Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106, 2095–2103 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21872
Ellis, M. J., Suman, V. J., Hoog, J., Lin, L., Snider, J., Prat, A. et al. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2342–2349 (2011).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6950
Allevi, G., Strina, C., Andreis, D., Zanoni, V., Bazzola, L., Bonardi, S. et al. Increased pathological complete response rate after a long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 108, 1587–1592 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.151
Grassadonia, A., Di Nicola, M., Grossi, S., Noccioli, P., Tavoletta, S., Politi, R. et al. Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors in elderly women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21, 1575–1582 (2014).
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3535-7
Colleoni, M., Sun, Z., Price, K. N., Karlsson, P., Forbes, J. F., Thürlimann, B. et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 927–935 (2016).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504
Robertson, J. F. R., Bondarenko, I. M., Trishkina, E., Dvorkin, M., Panasci, L., Manikhas, A. et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2997–3005 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32389-3
Ogston, K. N., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Hutcheon, A. W., Sarkar, T. K., Smith, I. et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast 12, 320–327 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00106-1
Symmans, W. F., Peintinger, F., Hatzis, C., Rajan, R., Kuerer, H., Valero, V. et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4414–4422 (2007).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823
Ellis, M. J., Suman, V. J., Hoog, J., Goncalves, R., Sanati, S., Creighton, C. J. et al. Ki67 proliferation index as a tool for chemotherapy decisions during and after neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment of breast cancer: results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance). J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 1061–1069 (2017).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4406
Finn, R. S., Martin, M., Rugo, H. S., Jones, S., Im, S. A., Gelmon, K. et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med 375, 1925–1936 (2016).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
Hortobagyi, G. N., Stemmer, S. M., Burris, H. A., Yap, Y. S., Sonke, G. S., Paluch-Shimon, S. et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for hr-positive, advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med 375, 1738–1748 (2016).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709
Goetz, M. P., Toi, M., Campone, M., Sohn, J., Paluch-Shimon, S., Huober, J. et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3638–3646 (2017).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155
Ma, C. X., Gao, F., Luo, J., Northfelt, D. W., Goetz, M., Forero, A. et al. NeoPalAna: neoadjuvant palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res 23, 4055–4065 (2017).
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3206
Cottu, P., D’Hondt, V., Dureau, S., Lerebours, F., Desmoulins, I., Heudel, P. E. et al. Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 29, 2334–2340 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy448

Auteurs

Florence Lerebours (F)

Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France. florence.lerebours@curie.fr.

Marina Pulido (M)

Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, INSERM CIC 14.01, Bordeaux, France.

Emmanuelle Fourme (E)

Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France.

Marc Debled (M)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Véronique Becette (V)

Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Hervé Bonnefoi (H)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Sofia Rivera (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.

Gaetan MacGrogan (G)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier (MA)

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Christine Tunon de Lara (CT)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Jean-Yves Pierga (JY)

Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Christel Breton-Callu (C)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Laurence Venat-Bouvet (L)

CHU, Limoges, France.

Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier (S)

Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, INSERM CIC 14.01, Bordeaux, France.

Thibault de la Motte Rouge (T)

Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Florence Dalenc (F)

Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Brigitte Sigal (B)

Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Thomas Bachelot (T)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Jérôme Lemonnier (J)

R&D UNICANCER, UCBG, Paris, France.

Nathalie Quenel-Tueux (N)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH