Outcomes in patients with dual antegrade conduction in the atrioventricular node: insights from a multicentre observational study.
AVNRT
Ablation
Atrial fibrillation
DAVNNT
Double fire
Slow pathway
Journal
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
ISSN: 1861-0692
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Cardiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101264123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
accepted:
05
01
2020
pubmed:
1
2
2020
medline:
10
6
2021
entrez:
1
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Supraventricular tachycardias induced by dual antegrade conduction via the atrioventricular (AV) node are rare but often misdiagnosed with severe consequences for the affected patients. As long-term follow-up in these patients was not available so far, this study investigates outcomes in patients with dual antegrade conduction in the AV node. In this multicentre observational study, patients from six European centres were studied. Catheter ablation was performed in 17 patients (52 ± 16 years) with dual antegrade conduction via both AV nodal pathways between 2012 and 2018. Patients with the final diagnosis of a manifest dual AV nodal non-re-entrant tachycardia had a mean delay of the correct diagnosis of over 1 year (range 2-31 months). Two patients received prescription of non-indicated oral anticoagulation, two further patients suffered from inappropriate shocks of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. In 12 patients, a co-existence of dual antegrade and re-entry conduction in the AV node was present. Mean fast pathway conduction time was 138 ± 61 ms and mean slow pathway conduction time was 593 ± 134 ms. Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in all patients. Post-procedurally oral anticoagulation was discontinued, without detection of cerebrovascular events or atrial fibrillation during a long-term follow-up of median 17 months (range 6-72 months). This first multicentre study investigating patients with supraventricular tachycardia and dual antegrade conduction in the AV node demonstrates that catheter ablation is safe and effective while long-term patient outcome is good. Autonomic tone dependent changes in ante- vs. retrograde conduction via slow and/or fast pathway can challenge the diagnosis and therapy in some patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Supraventricular tachycardias induced by dual antegrade conduction via the atrioventricular (AV) node are rare but often misdiagnosed with severe consequences for the affected patients. As long-term follow-up in these patients was not available so far, this study investigates outcomes in patients with dual antegrade conduction in the AV node.
METHODS AND RESULTS
RESULTS
In this multicentre observational study, patients from six European centres were studied. Catheter ablation was performed in 17 patients (52 ± 16 years) with dual antegrade conduction via both AV nodal pathways between 2012 and 2018. Patients with the final diagnosis of a manifest dual AV nodal non-re-entrant tachycardia had a mean delay of the correct diagnosis of over 1 year (range 2-31 months). Two patients received prescription of non-indicated oral anticoagulation, two further patients suffered from inappropriate shocks of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. In 12 patients, a co-existence of dual antegrade and re-entry conduction in the AV node was present. Mean fast pathway conduction time was 138 ± 61 ms and mean slow pathway conduction time was 593 ± 134 ms. Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in all patients. Post-procedurally oral anticoagulation was discontinued, without detection of cerebrovascular events or atrial fibrillation during a long-term follow-up of median 17 months (range 6-72 months).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This first multicentre study investigating patients with supraventricular tachycardia and dual antegrade conduction in the AV node demonstrates that catheter ablation is safe and effective while long-term patient outcome is good. Autonomic tone dependent changes in ante- vs. retrograde conduction via slow and/or fast pathway can challenge the diagnosis and therapy in some patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32002633
doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01596-y
pii: 10.1007/s00392-020-01596-y
pmc: PMC7375989
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1025-1034Références
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016 Nov 16;3(1):63-68
pubmed: 28491770
Circulation. 2007 Nov 20;116(21):2465-78
pubmed: 18025404
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Feb;22(2):263-7
pubmed: 10087539
Intern Med J. 2017 Apr;47(4):468-470
pubmed: 28401722
Eur Heart J. 2020 Feb 1;41(5):655-720
pubmed: 31504425
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2010 Jun;2(2):191-196
pubmed: 28770749
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17
pubmed: 18768944
Circulation. 2017 Sep 12;136(11):1070-1072
pubmed: 28893962
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Dec;106(12):947-952
pubmed: 28849269
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1493-531
pubmed: 14563598
Case Rep Cardiol. 2015;2015:326576
pubmed: 26491571
Circulation. 2016 Oct 18;134(16):1198-1201
pubmed: 27754950
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):251-5
pubmed: 15817081
Heart. 2017 Oct;103(19):1543-1552
pubmed: 28855272
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jun;109(6):694-699
pubmed: 31586219
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):535-9
pubmed: 19195516
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 1;38(17):1317-1326
pubmed: 28329395
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 30;327(5):313-8
pubmed: 1620170
Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):332-9
pubmed: 25888570
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2008 Sep;33(9):467-546
pubmed: 18707990
Circulation. 2016 Apr 5;133(14):e506-74
pubmed: 26399663
Circulation. 2006 Jul 18;114(3):191-5
pubmed: 16831982
Circulation. 2019 Apr 9;139(15):1848-1850
pubmed: 30958722
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013 Mar;18(2):199-203
pubmed: 23530491
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Aug;17(8):847-51
pubmed: 16903963
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1671-81
pubmed: 21950798
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2014 Jun;25(2):109-15
pubmed: 24830917
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;29(6):925-928
pubmed: 29505685
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jan;109(1):89-95
pubmed: 31087157
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Nov 1;14(5):1139-48
pubmed: 2681319
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014 Jan 01;14(1):44-8
pubmed: 24493916
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Jul;23(7):729-34
pubmed: 22509957
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 1;172(1):e9-e11
pubmed: 24456876
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014 Jan 01;14(1):12-25
pubmed: 24493912
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(23):e10938
pubmed: 29879037
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Sep;96(9):634-51
pubmed: 17687504