Multicenter prospective study on multivariant diagnostics of autoimmune bullous dermatoses using the BIOCHIP technology.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 18 03 2019
revised: 04 12 2019
accepted: 22 01 2020
pubmed: 1 2 2020
medline: 10 4 2021
entrez: 1 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The current standard in the serologic diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) is a multistep procedure sequentially applying different assays. In contrast, the BIOCHIP Mosaic technology combines multiple substrates for parallel analysis by indirect immunofluorescence. Sera from 749 consecutive, prospectively recruited patients with direct immunofluorescence-positive AIBD from 13 international study centers were analyzed independently and blinded by using (1) a BIOCHIP Mosaic including primate esophagus, salt-split skin, rat bladder, monkey liver, monkey liver with serosa, recombinant BP180 NC16A, and gliadin GAF3X, as well as HEK293 cells expressing recombinant desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, type VII collagen, and BP230 C-terminus and (2) the conventional multistep approach of the Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck. In 731 of 749 sera (97.6%), specific autoantibodies could be detected with the BIOCHIP Mosaic, similar to the conventional procedure (725 cases, 96.8%). The Cohen κ for both serologic approaches ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. In 6.5% of sera, differences between the 2 approaches occurred and were mainly attributed to autoantigen fragments not present on the BIOCHIP Mosaic. Laminin 332 and laminin γ1 are not represented on the BIOCHIP Mosaic. The BIOCHIP Mosaic is a standardized time- and serum-saving approach that further facilitates the serologic diagnosis of AIBD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The current standard in the serologic diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) is a multistep procedure sequentially applying different assays. In contrast, the BIOCHIP Mosaic technology combines multiple substrates for parallel analysis by indirect immunofluorescence.
METHODS METHODS
Sera from 749 consecutive, prospectively recruited patients with direct immunofluorescence-positive AIBD from 13 international study centers were analyzed independently and blinded by using (1) a BIOCHIP Mosaic including primate esophagus, salt-split skin, rat bladder, monkey liver, monkey liver with serosa, recombinant BP180 NC16A, and gliadin GAF3X, as well as HEK293 cells expressing recombinant desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, type VII collagen, and BP230 C-terminus and (2) the conventional multistep approach of the Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck.
RESULTS RESULTS
In 731 of 749 sera (97.6%), specific autoantibodies could be detected with the BIOCHIP Mosaic, similar to the conventional procedure (725 cases, 96.8%). The Cohen κ for both serologic approaches ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. In 6.5% of sera, differences between the 2 approaches occurred and were mainly attributed to autoantigen fragments not present on the BIOCHIP Mosaic.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Laminin 332 and laminin γ1 are not represented on the BIOCHIP Mosaic.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The BIOCHIP Mosaic is a standardized time- and serum-saving approach that further facilitates the serologic diagnosis of AIBD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32004645
pii: S0190-9622(20)30133-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.049
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1315-1322

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nina van Beek (N)

Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Stine Krüger (S)

Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Tarek Fuhrmann (T)

Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Susanne Lemcke (S)

Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, Lübeck, Germany.

Stephanie Goletz (S)

Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, Lübeck, Germany.

Christian Probst (C)

Institute of Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.

Lars Komorowski (L)

Institute of Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.

Giovanni Di Zenzo (G)

Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Marian Dmochowski (M)

Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Kossara Drenovska (K)

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sofia University of Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Michael Horn (M)

University Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Center of Laboratory Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.

Hana Jedlickova (H)

Department of Dermatology, St. Anna University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.

Cezary Kowalewski (C)

Department of Dermatology and Immunodermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Ljiljana Medenica (L)

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Dedee Murrell (D)

St. George Hospital, University of New South Wales School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.

Aikaterini Patsatsi (A)

2nd Dermatology Department, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Shamir Geller (S)

Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Soner Uzun (S)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Snejina Vassileva (S)

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sofia University of Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Xuejun Zhu (X)

Department of Dermatology, Beijing University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Kai Fechner (K)

Institute of Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.

Detlef Zillikens (D)

Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Winfried Stöcker (W)

Institute of Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.

Enno Schmidt (E)

Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, Lübeck, Germany. Electronic address: enno.schmidt@uksh.de.

Kristin Rentzsch (K)

Institute of Experimental Immunology, EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH