Quantitative analysis of facial asymmetry based on three-dimensional photography: a valuable indicator for asymmetrical temporomandibular joint affection in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients?
Facial asymmetry
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Morphometric analysis
Stereophotography
Temporomandibular joint
Three-dimensional photography
Journal
Pediatric rheumatology online journal
ISSN: 1546-0096
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101248897
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jan 2020
31 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
29
08
2019
accepted:
06
01
2020
entrez:
2
2
2020
pubmed:
2
2
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can cause osseous deformity in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and may impair mandibular growth. This study aimed to evaluate whether facial asymmetry determined clinically or by morphometric analysis of three-dimensional (3D) photographs in JIA patients is associated with an asymmetric affection of theTMJ. Of 76 consecutive JIA patients with a mean age of 11.7 years (range: 6.3-17.9), facial asymmetry was evaluated clinically (chin asymmetry, gonion asymmetry), and stereophotogrammetrically with 3D photographs. The facial surfaces were demarcated, then mirrored, superimposed using semi-automated landmarks, and quantitatively assessed (chin asymmetry, Hausdorff distances). Clinical and digital measurements were related to the diagnosis of right and left TMJ involvement derived from magnetic resonance images (MRI). Twenty-seven (34%) patients had an asymmetrical osseous deformity of the TMJ. By clinical evaluation, chin asymmetry was related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.02), but gonion asymmetry was not (p = 0.14). In regard to 3D-photograph based morphometric measurements, chin asymmetry was also related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.01), but neither the mean (p = 0.06) nor the maximal Hausdorff distance (p = 0.67). Despite the attested significance, none of the chin asymmetry evaluation methods appeared to hold sufficient predictive value (positive predictive values ≤54%; coefficient of determination ≤7%). For the assessment of facial asymmetry in JIA patients, morphometric measurements originating from 3D-photographs seem to deliver results comparable to the clinical assessment methods. The asymmetry of the face, especially around the chin, appears to be related to asymmetrical TMJ destruction, but none of the investigated measurement methods of the face were able to reliably predict the TMJ affection. Thus, facial asymmetry assessments, both qualitatively in a clinical setting and quantitatively based on 3D-photographs, have limited diagnostic value for TMJ involvement in JIA patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can cause osseous deformity in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and may impair mandibular growth. This study aimed to evaluate whether facial asymmetry determined clinically or by morphometric analysis of three-dimensional (3D) photographs in JIA patients is associated with an asymmetric affection of theTMJ.
METHODS
METHODS
Of 76 consecutive JIA patients with a mean age of 11.7 years (range: 6.3-17.9), facial asymmetry was evaluated clinically (chin asymmetry, gonion asymmetry), and stereophotogrammetrically with 3D photographs. The facial surfaces were demarcated, then mirrored, superimposed using semi-automated landmarks, and quantitatively assessed (chin asymmetry, Hausdorff distances). Clinical and digital measurements were related to the diagnosis of right and left TMJ involvement derived from magnetic resonance images (MRI).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-seven (34%) patients had an asymmetrical osseous deformity of the TMJ. By clinical evaluation, chin asymmetry was related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.02), but gonion asymmetry was not (p = 0.14). In regard to 3D-photograph based morphometric measurements, chin asymmetry was also related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.01), but neither the mean (p = 0.06) nor the maximal Hausdorff distance (p = 0.67). Despite the attested significance, none of the chin asymmetry evaluation methods appeared to hold sufficient predictive value (positive predictive values ≤54%; coefficient of determination ≤7%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
For the assessment of facial asymmetry in JIA patients, morphometric measurements originating from 3D-photographs seem to deliver results comparable to the clinical assessment methods. The asymmetry of the face, especially around the chin, appears to be related to asymmetrical TMJ destruction, but none of the investigated measurement methods of the face were able to reliably predict the TMJ affection. Thus, facial asymmetry assessments, both qualitatively in a clinical setting and quantitatively based on 3D-photographs, have limited diagnostic value for TMJ involvement in JIA patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32005249
doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0401-y
pii: 10.1186/s12969-020-0401-y
pmc: PMC6995089
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10Références
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Mar;50(3):586-92
pubmed: 21097878
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;76(12):2463-2465
pubmed: 30028954
Scand J Rheumatol. 1989;18(4):197-204
pubmed: 2799301
J Rheumatol. 1998 Jul;25(7):1406-12
pubmed: 9676776
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr;58(4):1189-96
pubmed: 18383394
Pediatr Rev. 2006 Apr;27(4):e24-32
pubmed: 16581950
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):125-32
pubmed: 21795753
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014 Apr 23;12:13
pubmed: 24782683
J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):390-2
pubmed: 14760812
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1080
pubmed: 16675816
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;71(10):1683-7
pubmed: 23932113
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015 Dec 09;13:56
pubmed: 26646650
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Mar;48(3):411-426
pubmed: 29134239
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 May;31(5):602-11
pubmed: 3377867
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jun;48(6):680-5
pubmed: 19386819
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018 Apr 25;16(1):32
pubmed: 29695255
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Jun;45(6):717-32
pubmed: 26708936
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
J Orthod. 2001 Mar;28(1):53-8
pubmed: 11254804
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 May;70(5):758-767
pubmed: 28805021
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 May;44(5):597-607
pubmed: 26924432
J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1925-33
pubmed: 17696265
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):799-807
pubmed: 31168695
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;13(8):460-461
pubmed: 28660911
J Rheumatol. 2015 Aug;42(8):1514-22
pubmed: 26034145
J Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;41(9):1871-7
pubmed: 24986847
EPMA J. 2016 Jun 02;7:12
pubmed: 27257443
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):67-78
pubmed: 7817963
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):182-91
pubmed: 26827974
Scand J Rheumatol. 2010;39(5):373-9
pubmed: 20615158
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2138-49
pubmed: 21684384