Obstetric fistula in southern Mozambique: a qualitative study on women's experiences of care pregnancy, delivery and post-partum.
Adolescent
Adult
Delivery of Health Care
/ standards
Delivery, Obstetric
/ standards
Female
Health Facilities
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Middle Aged
Mozambique
/ epidemiology
Obstetric Labor Complications
/ prevention & control
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ psychology
Postpartum Period
/ psychology
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
/ psychology
Qualitative Research
Vesicovaginal Fistula
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
Mozambique
Obstetric fistula
Quality of care
women’s experiences
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jan 2020
31 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
24
12
2018
accepted:
14
01
2020
entrez:
2
2
2020
pubmed:
2
2
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Obstetric fistula is still common in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) despite the on-going shift to increased facility deliveries in the same settings. The social behavioural circumstances in which fistula, as well as its consequences, still occur are poorly documented, particularly from the perspective of the experiences of women with obstetric fistula. This study sought to describe women's experiences of antenatal, partum and post-partum care in southern Mozambique, and to pinpoint those experiences that are unique to women with fistula in order to understand the care-seeking and care provision circumstances which could have been modified to avoid or mitigate the onset or consequences of fistula. This study took place in Maputo and Gaza provinces, southern Mozambique, in 2016-2017. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews conducted with 14 women with positive diagnoses of fistula and an equal number of women without fistula. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim prior to thematic analysis using NVivo11. Study participants had all attended antenatal care (ANC) visits and had prepared for a facility birth. Prolonged or obstructed labour, multiple referrals, and delays in receiving secondary and tertiary health care were common among the discourses of women with fistula. The term "fistula" was rarely known among participants, but the condition (referred to as "loss of water" or "illness of spillage") was recognised after being prompted on its signs and symptoms. Women with fistula were invariably aware of the links between fistula and poor birth assistance, in contrast with those without fistula, who blamed the condition on women's physiological and behavioural characteristics. Although women do seek antenatal and peri-partum care in health facilities, deficiencies and delays in birth assistance, referral and life-saving interventions were commonly reported by women with fistula. Furthermore, weaknesses in quality of care, not only in relation to prevention, but also the resolution of the damage, were evident. Quality improvement of birth care is necessary, both at primary and referral level. There is a need to increase awareness and develop guidelines for prevention, early detection and management of obstetric fistula, including early postpartum treatment, availability of fistula repair for complex cases, and rehabilitation, coupled with the promotion of community consciousness of the problem.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Obstetric fistula is still common in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) despite the on-going shift to increased facility deliveries in the same settings. The social behavioural circumstances in which fistula, as well as its consequences, still occur are poorly documented, particularly from the perspective of the experiences of women with obstetric fistula. This study sought to describe women's experiences of antenatal, partum and post-partum care in southern Mozambique, and to pinpoint those experiences that are unique to women with fistula in order to understand the care-seeking and care provision circumstances which could have been modified to avoid or mitigate the onset or consequences of fistula.
METHODS
METHODS
This study took place in Maputo and Gaza provinces, southern Mozambique, in 2016-2017. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews conducted with 14 women with positive diagnoses of fistula and an equal number of women without fistula. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim prior to thematic analysis using NVivo11.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Study participants had all attended antenatal care (ANC) visits and had prepared for a facility birth. Prolonged or obstructed labour, multiple referrals, and delays in receiving secondary and tertiary health care were common among the discourses of women with fistula. The term "fistula" was rarely known among participants, but the condition (referred to as "loss of water" or "illness of spillage") was recognised after being prompted on its signs and symptoms. Women with fistula were invariably aware of the links between fistula and poor birth assistance, in contrast with those without fistula, who blamed the condition on women's physiological and behavioural characteristics.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although women do seek antenatal and peri-partum care in health facilities, deficiencies and delays in birth assistance, referral and life-saving interventions were commonly reported by women with fistula. Furthermore, weaknesses in quality of care, not only in relation to prevention, but also the resolution of the damage, were evident. Quality improvement of birth care is necessary, both at primary and referral level. There is a need to increase awareness and develop guidelines for prevention, early detection and management of obstetric fistula, including early postpartum treatment, availability of fistula repair for complex cases, and rehabilitation, coupled with the promotion of community consciousness of the problem.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32005268
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0860-0
pii: 10.1186/s12978-020-0860-0
pmc: PMC6995132
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21Références
J Pak Med Assoc. 1996 Jun;46(6):135-6
pubmed: 8991373
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 26;15:193
pubmed: 26306705
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
pubmed: 8042057
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:73
pubmed: 26359255
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 10;18(1):155
pubmed: 29747604
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e80-2
pubmed: 26823218
BMC Urol. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):41
pubmed: 27406310
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1445-1457
pubmed: 27680693
Ann Glob Health. 2017 May - Aug;83(3-4):541-549
pubmed: 29221527
Afr J Reprod Health. 2015 Mar;19(1):124-32
pubmed: 26103702
Reprod Health. 2016 Jul 22;13(1):87
pubmed: 27449061
Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 10;14(1):147
pubmed: 29126412
Cult Health Sex. 2009 Jun;11(5):499-513
pubmed: 19444686
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Dec;91(3):271-8
pubmed: 16246344
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0184249
pubmed: 29394247
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):795-9
pubmed: 15467543
Reprod Health Matters. 2016 May;24(47):65-73
pubmed: 27578340
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Nov 10;10:73
pubmed: 21067606
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Nov 24;15:107
pubmed: 26603842
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996 Sep;51(9):568-74
pubmed: 8873157
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;18(2):147-51
pubmed: 16601475
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e845-e855
pubmed: 27670090
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jan;22(1):91-8
pubmed: 20798927
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e021223
pubmed: 30413495
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 30;13:246
pubmed: 24373152
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99 Suppl 1:S10-5
pubmed: 17727854