Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Improving Subjective Well-Being Among Healthy Individuals: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
cost-effectiveness
healthy individuals
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
randomized controlled trial
subjective well-being
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2020
08 May 2020
Historique:
received:
16
08
2019
accepted:
30
01
2020
revised:
26
12
2019
pubmed:
2
2
2020
medline:
2
2
2020
entrez:
2
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have indicated that higher subjective well-being works as a protective factor for health. Some studies have already shown the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on improving subjective well-being. However, these studies targeted specific populations rather than the general public. Furthermore, they assessed either life evaluation or affective aspects of subjective well-being rather than the concept as a whole, including the eudemonic aspect of well-being. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for improving the wholistic aspects of subjective well-being in healthy individuals. This study was an 8-week, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial with a 2-month follow-up. Healthy individuals aged 20-65 years with scores lower than 25 on the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) were eligible to participate and randomly allocated to the MBCT group or the wait-list control group. The intervention program was developed by modifying an MBCT program to improve the well-being of a nonclinical population. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in mean change scores from the baseline on the SWLS. The secondary outcomes included scores on the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. This study began recruiting participants in July 2018 and recruitment was completed at the end of September 2019. Data collection and dataset construction was completed by the end of March 2020. This study is unique in that it investigates MBCT's effects on the three different aspects of subjective well-being: life evaluation, affect, and eudemonia. It is limited, as the specific effect attributable to MBCT cannot be detected because of the lack of an active control group. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000031885; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036376. DERR1-10.2196/15892.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have indicated that higher subjective well-being works as a protective factor for health. Some studies have already shown the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on improving subjective well-being. However, these studies targeted specific populations rather than the general public. Furthermore, they assessed either life evaluation or affective aspects of subjective well-being rather than the concept as a whole, including the eudemonic aspect of well-being.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for improving the wholistic aspects of subjective well-being in healthy individuals.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was an 8-week, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial with a 2-month follow-up. Healthy individuals aged 20-65 years with scores lower than 25 on the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) were eligible to participate and randomly allocated to the MBCT group or the wait-list control group. The intervention program was developed by modifying an MBCT program to improve the well-being of a nonclinical population. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in mean change scores from the baseline on the SWLS. The secondary outcomes included scores on the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This study began recruiting participants in July 2018 and recruitment was completed at the end of September 2019. Data collection and dataset construction was completed by the end of March 2020.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study is unique in that it investigates MBCT's effects on the three different aspects of subjective well-being: life evaluation, affect, and eudemonia. It is limited, as the specific effect attributable to MBCT cannot be detected because of the lack of an active control group.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000031885; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036376.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/15892.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32005642
pii: v9i5e15892
doi: 10.2196/15892
pmc: PMC7244996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e15892Informations de copyright
©Mitsuhiro Sado, Teppei Kosugi, Akira Ninomiya, Maki Nagaoka, Sunre Park, Daisuke Fujisawa, Joichiro Shirahase, Masaru Mimura. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.05.2020.
Références
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep 1;54(5):573-83
pubmed: 12946886
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2008;11(1):67-74
pubmed: 18317710
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Sep 30;8:85
pubmed: 18826581
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e111191
pubmed: 25340520
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 06;5:1504
pubmed: 25610410
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72
pubmed: 10158943
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jun;58(6):550-60
pubmed: 27281638
Brain Behav Immun. 2013 Jan;27(1):145-54
pubmed: 23078984
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):11-21
pubmed: 17291166
Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82
pubmed: 12964174
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jan;68(1):117-31
pubmed: 22144347
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Mar;67(3):267-77
pubmed: 21254055
Mind Brain Educ. 2013 Sep;7(3):
pubmed: 24324528
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 08;9:1855
pubmed: 30349493
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;33(6):763-71
pubmed: 23796855
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48230
pubmed: 23133619
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Jun;36(3):601-14
pubmed: 18469160
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45
pubmed: 16443717
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Apr;85(1):50-9
pubmed: 24804430
Health Econ. 2002 Jun;11(4):341-53
pubmed: 12007165
Holist Nurs Pract. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):26-35
pubmed: 15736727
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):86-90
pubmed: 25066651
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Feb;45(2):156-74
pubmed: 12625231
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648
pubmed: 25468152
J Psychosom Res. 2007 May;62(5):589-94
pubmed: 17467414
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):615-23
pubmed: 10965637
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):786-92
pubmed: 23541163
J Behav Med. 1998 Dec;21(6):581-99
pubmed: 9891256
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Aug 13;13:107
pubmed: 23941053
Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;32(10):1110-3
pubmed: 23527521
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):803-55
pubmed: 16351326
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138089
pubmed: 26367270