Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 01 2020
31 01 2020
Historique:
received:
19
08
2019
accepted:
10
01
2020
entrez:
2
2
2020
pubmed:
2
2
2020
medline:
12
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our objective was to prospectively validate the use of gestational sac (GS), yolk sac (YS) diameter, crown-rump length (CRL), and embryonal heart rate (HR) dimensions to identify early pregnancy loss. This was a prospective cohort study of first trimester pregnancies. GS and YS diameter, CRL, and HR measurements were serially obtained in singleton and twin pregnancies from 6 through 10 weeks' gestation. Non-parametric tests and logistic regression models were used for comparisons of distributions and testing of associations. A total of 252 patients were included, of which 199 were singleton pregnancies, 51 were twins, and 2 were triplets (304 total fetuses). Fifty-two patients had 61 losses. We built nomograms with the changes of the parameters evaluated in ongoing, as well as in pregnancy loss. In the pregnancies which failed, all the parameters showed significant changes, with different temporal onsets: GS and YS were the first to become abnormal, deviating from normality as early as 6 weeks' gestation (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.0-0.09, and OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.53-7.34, respectively), followed by changes in HR, and CRL, which became evident at 7 and 8 weeks (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.0, and OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.73, respectively). Our observations showed that, after 5 complete weeks' gestation, a small GS and a large YS reliably predicted pregnancy loss. The YS reliably identified the occurrence of a miscarriage at least 7 days prior its occurrence. CRL and HR became abnormal at a later time in pregnancy and closer to the event. These findings have important implications for patient counseling and care planning, as well as a potential bearing on cost effectiveness within early pregnancy care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32005925
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58114-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-58114-3
pmc: PMC6994659
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1545Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):518-524
pubmed: 28865551
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;28(4):207-19
pubmed: 20847544
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;28(5):575-8
pubmed: 21983739
Endocr Pract. 2015 Dec;21(12):1415-26
pubmed: 26642102
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):78
pubmed: 28264669
Med Ultrason. 2014 Mar;16(1):15-20
pubmed: 24567919
Fertil Steril. 2003 Mar;79(3):577-84
pubmed: 12620443
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Mar 31;14:15
pubmed: 27036944
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;138(3):325-330
pubmed: 28602043
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Jan;42(1):21-8
pubmed: 26694213
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;55(5):464-72
pubmed: 26294017
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jan;220:122-131
pubmed: 29207325
Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):503-9
pubmed: 8774277
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;38(5):510-5
pubmed: 21077156
J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Aug;18(8):537-41
pubmed: 10447078
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):63
pubmed: 23095139
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;8(5):314-7
pubmed: 8978003
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 May;37(5):1233-1241
pubmed: 29090486
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000 Aug;17(7):385-7
pubmed: 11077619
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;42(6):634-43
pubmed: 23630102
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Feb;46(2):223-228
pubmed: 31814235
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Nov;19(11):536-8
pubmed: 12484496
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;44(6):641-8
pubmed: 25044000
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1258-1267
pubmed: 25932865