Predicting positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy: A prospective multicentre observational study (the RECORd 2 project).
Aged
Area Under Curve
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ secondary
Databases, Factual
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospitals, High-Volume
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Low-Volume
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
/ pathology
Logistic Models
Male
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasm, Residual
Nephrectomy
/ methods
Nomograms
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Risk Factors
Nephron-sparing surgery
Nomogram
Partial nephrectomy
Renal cell carcinoma
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Surgical margins
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
11
12
2019
accepted:
15
01
2020
pubmed:
3
2
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
entrez:
3
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
to evaluate clinical predictors of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in a large multicenter prospective observational study and to develop a clinic nomogram to predict the likelihood of PSMs after partial nephrectomy (PN). We prospectively evaluated 4308 patients who had surgical treatment for renal tumors between January 2013 and December 2016 at 26 urological Italian Centers (RECORd 2 project). Two multivariable logistic models were evaluated to predict the likelihood of PSMs. Center caseload was dichotomized using a visual assessment adjusted for several predictors of PSMs. A nomogram predicting PSMs was developed. Overall, 2076 patients treated with PN were evaluated. pT1a, pT1b, pT2 and pT3a were recorded in 68.7%, 22.6%, 2.1% and 6.6% of the patients, respectively. PSMs were recorded in 342 (16.5%) patients. From a null multivariable model against number of PN/year, 60 PN/year were identified as the best cut-off to define a high-volume centre. At multivariable analysis, clinical stage (cT1a vs. cT2 [OR 1.94]; p = 0.03), volume centre (≤60 PN/year) (OR 2.22; p < 0.0001), imperative vs elective indication (OR 2.10; p = 0.04), surgical technique (laparoscopic vs. open [OR 1.62; p = 0.002), lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.27; p = 0.01) and upstaging to pT3a (OR 2.81; p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of PSMs. The final nomogram included age, ASA score, Charlson score, clinical tumor stage, surgical indication, surgical approach, surgical technique, PADUA score, clamp procedure and volume centre. PSMs after PN were significantly more likely in patients with lower clinical stage, higher PADUA score, in individuals referred to laparoscopic PN and in those treated at lower volume centers. We used these data to develop a nomogram to predict such risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32007380
pii: S0748-7983(20)30041-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.022
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1353-1359Investigateurs
Vincenzo Altieri
(V)
Francesco Berardinelli
(F)
Marco Borghesi
(M)
Carlo Andrea Bravi
(CA)
Pierluigi Bove
(P)
Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani
(GE)
Riccardo Campi
(R)
Antonio Celia
(A)
Elisabetta Costantini
(E)
Luigi Da Pozzo
(L)
Mario Falsaperla
(M)
Matteo Ferro
(M)
Maria Furlan
(M)
Simone Sforza
(S)
Francesco Marson
(F)
Francesco Montorsi
(F)
Sebastiano Nazzani
(S)
Angelo Porreca
(A)
Giorgio Ivan Russo
(GI)
Luigi Schips
(L)
Cesare Selli
(C)
Alchiede Simonato
(A)
Salvatore Siracusano
(S)
Carlo Trombetta
(C)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.