Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Intraperitoneal repair primary cesarean delivery repeat cesarean delivery uterine exteriorization uterine insicition

Journal

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 4 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair, in first compared to repeat cesarean delivery. A prospective randomized control single-blinded trial conducted in a single tertiary center between March 2014 and March 2015, including 32 and 63 women in first and recurrent cesarean sections, respectively. Inclusion criteria were elective operation and gestational age ≥37 weeks. Operative outcomes were compared between the groups including mean operative time, blood loss, hypotension, perioperative nausea and pain. Post-operative outcomes were further compared, including post-operative analgesia demand, first recognized bowel movement, nausea, length of hospital stay, fever, endometritis surgical site infection rate, and total satisfaction. During the study period, 45 and 50 women were designated for uterine exteriorization and intraperitoneal uterine repair, respectively. Mean blood loss was 452 cc (±10.44) for the extraperitoneal compared to 540 cc (±29.83) for the intraperitoneal uterine repair group ( Intraperitoneal repair of uterine incision is associated with higher operative blood loss compared to uterine exteriorization. No other differences in operative and postoperative complication rates were found between the groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32008386
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

433-438

Auteurs

Aya Mohr-Sasson (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Elias Castel (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Irina Lurie (I)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Sigal Heifetz (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Salim Kees (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Eyal Sivan (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH