The Changing Landscape of Pediatric Viral Enteropathogens in the Post-Rotavirus Vaccine Era.
acute gastroenteritis
healthy controls
outpatient
rotavirus
viral detection
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 02 2021
16 02 2021
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
accepted:
31
01
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
29
4
2021
entrez:
4
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a common reason for children to receive medical care. However, the viral etiology of AGE illness is not well described in the post-rotavirus vaccine era, particularly in the outpatient (OP) setting. Between 2012 and 2015, children 15 days through 17 years old presenting to Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee, with AGE were enrolled prospectively from the inpatient, emergency department, and OP settings, and stool specimens were collected. Healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled and frequency matched for period, age group, race, and ethnicity. Stool specimens were tested by means of reverse-transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for norovirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus RNA and by Rotaclone enzyme immunoassay for rotavirus antigen, followed by polymerase chain reaction verification of antigen detection. A total of 3705 AGE case patients and 1563 HCs were enrolled, among whom 2885 case patients (78%) and 1110 HCs (71%) provided stool specimens that were tested. All 4 viruses were more frequently detected in AGE case patients than in HCs (norovirus, 22% vs 8%, respectively; rotavirus, 10% vs 1%; sapovirus, 10% vs 5%; and astrovirus, 5% vs 2%; P < .001 for each virus). In the OP setting, rates of AGE due to norovirus were higher than rate for the other 3 viruses. Children <5 years old had higher OP AGE rates than older children for all viruses. Norovirus remains the most common virus detected in all settings, occurring nearly twice as frequently as the next most common pathogens, sapovirus and rotavirus. Combined, norovirus, sapovirus, rotavirus, and astrovirus were associated with almost half of all AGE visits and therefore are an important reason for children to receive medical care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a common reason for children to receive medical care. However, the viral etiology of AGE illness is not well described in the post-rotavirus vaccine era, particularly in the outpatient (OP) setting.
METHODS
Between 2012 and 2015, children 15 days through 17 years old presenting to Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee, with AGE were enrolled prospectively from the inpatient, emergency department, and OP settings, and stool specimens were collected. Healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled and frequency matched for period, age group, race, and ethnicity. Stool specimens were tested by means of reverse-transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for norovirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus RNA and by Rotaclone enzyme immunoassay for rotavirus antigen, followed by polymerase chain reaction verification of antigen detection.
RESULTS
A total of 3705 AGE case patients and 1563 HCs were enrolled, among whom 2885 case patients (78%) and 1110 HCs (71%) provided stool specimens that were tested. All 4 viruses were more frequently detected in AGE case patients than in HCs (norovirus, 22% vs 8%, respectively; rotavirus, 10% vs 1%; sapovirus, 10% vs 5%; and astrovirus, 5% vs 2%; P < .001 for each virus). In the OP setting, rates of AGE due to norovirus were higher than rate for the other 3 viruses. Children <5 years old had higher OP AGE rates than older children for all viruses.
CONCLUSIONS
Norovirus remains the most common virus detected in all settings, occurring nearly twice as frequently as the next most common pathogens, sapovirus and rotavirus. Combined, norovirus, sapovirus, rotavirus, and astrovirus were associated with almost half of all AGE visits and therefore are an important reason for children to receive medical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32009161
pii: 5721141
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa100
pmc: PMC7884803
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rotavirus Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
576-585Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI144673
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCIRD CDC HHS
ID : U01 IP001059
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCIRD CDC HHS
ID : U01 IP001063
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000445
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1121-30
pubmed: 23514289
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 2;13(7):e0199763
pubmed: 29965979
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Sep;29(9):855-9
pubmed: 20581736
J Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 1;208(5):790-800
pubmed: 23757337
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;51(8):693-700
pubmed: 28787355
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019 Nov 6;8(5):414-421
pubmed: 30184153
J Clin Virol. 2013 Sep;58(1):31-5
pubmed: 23886502
J Pediatr. 2016 Sep;176:50-56.e2
pubmed: 27329497
Lancet. 2017 Dec 17;388(10063):3027-3035
pubmed: 27839855
J Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;214(5):732-8
pubmed: 27302190
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Mar;146(4):465-467
pubmed: 29429424
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010 Apr;9(4):395-407
pubmed: 20370550
Pediatrics. 2011 Aug;128(2):e267-75
pubmed: 21768317
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):725-730
pubmed: 24981041
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Sep;7(9):536-541
pubmed: 28790133
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):3047-54
pubmed: 23850952
Clin Lab Med. 2015 Jun;35(2):461-86
pubmed: 26004652
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Jun 21;68(24):539-543
pubmed: 31220058
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 03;4(3):ofx131
pubmed: 32455144
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Oct 1;172(10):958-965
pubmed: 30105384
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Feb;51(2):472-80
pubmed: 23175269