Comparison of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Following Digital Insertion in Nonparalyzed Anesthetized Patients.
I-gel
ProSeal laryngeal mask airway
oropharyngeal seal pressure
Journal
Anesthesia, essays and researches
ISSN: 0259-1162
Titre abrégé: Anesth Essays Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101578762
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
31
10
2019
revised:
11
11
2019
accepted:
19
11
2019
entrez:
4
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study is aimed to compare the efficacy of I-gel and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in nonparalysed anesthetized individuals following manufacturer-recommended digital insertion. In this prospective randomized observational study, 40 American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients, aged 18-65 years scheduled for elective surgical procedures were allocated either to PLMA group (Group P, First attempt and overall insertion success were similar (PLMA, 85% and 100%; I-gel 80% and 100%, respectively). Mean (standard deviation) insertion times were similar (PLMA, 27.40 [11.51] s; I-gel 25.45 [9.03] s). Mean OPL pressure was 3.5 cm H The time required for digital insertion of PLMA and I-gel in nonparalyzed anesthetized patients is similar but PLMA forms a better oropharyngeal seal. I-gel is better positioned over the laryngeal framework and esophagus. I-gel allows easier passage of Ryle's tube through its drain channel than PLMA. The incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness was higher with PLMA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32009713
doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_132_19
pii: AER-13-669
pmc: PMC6937903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
669-675Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Masui. 2013 Feb;62(2):134-9
pubmed: 23479911
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):183-7
pubmed: 24803754
Anaesthesia. 1996 Dec;51(12):1167-70
pubmed: 9038461
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):858-864
pubmed: 30532321
Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 May;12(4):322-6
pubmed: 11982839
Br J Anaesth. 1999 Feb;82(2):286-7
pubmed: 10365012
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;29(1):56-60
pubmed: 23493414
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;88(4):527-33
pubmed: 12066729
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;26(4):451-7
pubmed: 21547168
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Jun;88(6):824-7
pubmed: 12173201
Br J Anaesth. 2000 May;84(5):650-4
pubmed: 10844848
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Mar;8(3):80-4
pubmed: 24783088
Anaesthesia. 2005 Oct;60(10):1022-6
pubmed: 16179048
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:634320
pubmed: 25802890
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jul 2;93(25):1978-80
pubmed: 24169248
Indian J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;53(3):302-5
pubmed: 20640137
Pain Pract. 2003 Dec;3(4):310-6
pubmed: 17166126
Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1124-30
pubmed: 18616521
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Dec;63(6):510-4
pubmed: 23277811
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):674-8
pubmed: 19453322
Anaesthesia. 2010 Sep;65(9):913-6
pubmed: 20645948
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0119469
pubmed: 25812135
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;88(4):534-9
pubmed: 12066730
J Int Med Res. 2016 Jun;44(3):405-18
pubmed: 27009026
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Oct;30(5):624-7
pubmed: 12413264
Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):991-5
pubmed: 18557971
Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):289-95
pubmed: 11818758
Anaesthesia. 2006 Sep;61(9):891-5
pubmed: 16922757
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):221-5
pubmed: 25948905
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;61(12):972-977
pubmed: 29307902
Singapore Med J. 2016 Aug;57(8):432-7
pubmed: 27549212
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;102(2):264-8
pubmed: 19151051
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(1):35-41
pubmed: 22783708