Determining Significant Elevation of Intraocular Pressure Using Self-tonometry.


Journal

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry
ISSN: 1538-9235
Titre abrégé: Optom Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
entrez: 4 2 2020
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 25 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Icare HOME rebound tonometry is increasingly adopted into clinical practice for IOP phasing of glaucoma patients and suspects. Because of measurement differences with applanation tonometry and diurnal fluctuations, interpretation of the IOP measured with Icare HOME phasing can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to use a large patient cohort to develop a practical, analytical tool for interpreting Icare HOME measurements with respect to applanation pressure. IOP measurements using the Icare HOME and an applanation tonometer were taken prospectively in 498 consecutive patients. Bland-Altman, frequency distribution, and linear regression analysis were applied to determine measurement differences. A novel criterion, Threshold Icare HOME IOP, was developed to assist identification of elevation above target applanation pressure, considering the expected diurnal variation and measurement variability. Icare HOME tended to underestimate applanation tonometry (mean bias, -1.7 mmHg; 95% limits of agreement, -7.0 to +3.6). Overall, differences were within ±3 mmHg in 71.5% and ±5 mmHg in 92% of patients. Based on the novel criterion developed, Icare HOME measurements that exceed target applanation pressure by 6 mmHg or greater are generally outside the 95% limit of expected observations. The Threshold Icare HOME IOP is a novel and practical criterion that can assist clinicians in their interpretation of Icare HOME phasing measurements with respect to target applanation pressures. Elevation above the expected thresholds may prompt closer monitoring or even modifications to glaucoma management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32011580
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001478
pii: 00006324-202002000-00007
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

86-93

Références

Miglior S, Bertuzzi F. Relationship between Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma Onset and Progression. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2013;13:32–5.
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma Progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–79.
Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, et al. Intraocular Pressure Control and Long-term Visual Field Loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1766–73.
Konstas AG, Quaranta L, Mikropoulos DG, et al. Peak Intraocular Pressure and Glaucomatous Progression in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2012;28:26–32.
Barkana Y, Anis S, Liebmann J, et al. Clinical Utility of Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Outside of Normal Office Hours in Patients with Glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:793–7.
Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J. 24-Hour Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Management: A Retrospective Review. J Glaucoma 2003;12:232–6.
Nakakura S, Nomura Y, Ataka S, et al. Relation between Office Intraocular Pressure and 24-hour Intraocular Pressure in Patients with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Treated with a Combination of Topical Antiglaucoma Eye Drops. J Glaucoma 2007;16:201–4.
Dabasia PL, Lawrenson JG, Murdoch IE. Evaluation of a New Rebound Tonometer for Self-measurement of Intraocular Pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:1139–43.
Noguchi A, Nakakura S, Fujio Y, et al. A Pilot Evaluation Assessing the Ease of Use and Accuracy of the New Self/Home-tonometer IcareHome in Healthy Young Subjects. J Glaucoma 2016;25:835–41.
Huang J, Katalinic P, Kalloniatis M, et al. Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations with Self-tonometry in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects: A Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci 2018;95:88–95.
Konstas AG, Kahook MY, Araie M, et al. Diurnal and 24-h Intraocular Pressures in Glaucoma: Monitoring Strategies and Impact on Prognosis and Treatment. Adv Ther 2018;35:1775–804.
Termuhlen J, Mihailovic N, Alnawaiseh M, et al. Accuracy of Measurements with the Icare Home Rebound Tonometer. J Glaucoma 2016;25:533–8.
Takagi D, Sawada A, Yamamoto T. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare Home: Comparison with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. J Glaucoma 2017;26:613–8.
Mudie LI, LaBarre S, Varadaraj V, et al. The Icare HOME (TA022) Study: Performance of an Intraocular Pressure Measuring Device for Self-tonometry by Glaucoma Patients. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1675–84.
Pronin S, Brown L, Megaw R, et al. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients with Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:1030–6.
Cvenkel B, Velkovska MA, Jordanova VD. Self-measurement with Icare HOME Tonometer, Patients' Feasibility and Acceptability. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019;1120672118823124.
García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, et al. Accuracy of the New Icare Rebound Tonometer vs. Other Portable Tonometers in Healthy Eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:102–7.
Nakakura S. Icare® Rebound Tonometers: Review of Their Characteristics and Ease of Use. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:1245–53.
Arora R, Bellamy H, Austin M. Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of the Perkins Handheld and Goldmann Slit Lamp-mounted Methods. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:605–10.
Gaton DD, Ehrenberg M, Lusky M, et al. Effect of Repeated Applanation Tonometry on the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements. Curr Eye Res 2010;35:475–9.
David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, et al. Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Variations: An Analysis of 690 Diurnal Curves. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:280–3.
Jonas JB, Budde WM, Stroux A, et al. Circadian Intraocular Pressure Profiles in Chronic Open Angle Glaucomas. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2010;5:92–100.
Bhartiya S, Ichhpujani P. Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation in Eyes with Angle-closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2015;9:20–3.
Hasegawa K, Ishida K, Sawada A, et al. Diurnal Variation of Intraocular Pressure in Suspected Normal-tension Glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:449–54.
Tajunisah I, Reddy SC, Fathilah J. Diurnal Variation of Intraocular Pressure in Suspected Glaucoma Patients and Their Outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1851–7.
Sakamoto M, Kanamori A, Fujihara M, et al. Assessment of Icareone Rebound Tonometer for Self-measuring Intraocular Pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:243–8.
Icare Finland Oy. Instruction Manual for Health Care Professionals. Available at: http://www.icaretonometer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Icare_HOME_instruction_manual_TA022-036_EN-3-1_lo.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2019.
Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R, et al. Reliability and Reproducibility of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measurement with the Icare® HOME Rebound Tonometer (Model TA022) and Comparison with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients. J Fr Ophtalmol 2017;40:865–75.
Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S, et al. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer. J Glaucoma 2018;27:511–8.
Dey A, David RL, Asokan R, et al. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes? Optom Vis Sci 2018;95:120–8.
Chen E, Querat L, Akerstedt C. Self-tonometry as a Complement in the Investigation of Glaucoma Patients. Acta Ophthalmol 2016;94:788–92.
Pearce JG, Maddess T. The Clinical Interpretation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Review. J Glaucoma 2019;28:302–6.
Desmond T, Arthur P, Watt K. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Ultrasound Pachymetry and 2 New Devices, Tonoref III and RS-3000. Int Ophthalmol 2019;39:917–23.
Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, et al. Distribution of Intraocular Pressure. The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1051–7.
Baboolal SO, Smit DP. South African Eye Study (SAES): Ethnic Differences in Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure. Eye (Lond) 2018;32:749–56.
Chua J, Tham YC, Liao J, et al. Ethnic Differences of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2013–22.
Chan MPY, Broadway DC, Khawaja AP, et al. Glaucoma and Intraocular Pressure in Epic-Norfolk Eye Study: Cross Sectional Study. BMJ 2017;358:j3889.
Bolivar G, Sanchez-Barahona C, Teus M, et al. Effect of Topical Prostaglandin Analogues on Corneal Hysteresis. Acta Ophthalmol 2015;93:e495–8.
Tsikripis P, Papaconstantinou D, Koutsandrea C, et al. The Effect of Prostaglandin Analogs on the Biomechanical Properties and Central Thickness of the Cornea of Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma: A 3-year Study on 108 Eyes. Drug Des Devel Ther 2013;7:1149–56.
Meda R, Wang Q, Paoloni D, et al. The Impact of Chronic Use of Prostaglandin Analogues on the Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Patients with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:120–5.

Auteurs

Jessie Huang (J)

Centre for Eye Health and School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Jack Phu (J)

Centre for Eye Health and School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Michael Kalloniatis (M)

Centre for Eye Health and School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH