Changes in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use Following a Low-Touch Prescriber Fax Intervention.
Adult
Analgesics, Opioid
/ administration & dosage
Benzodiazepines
/ administration & dosage
California
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Medicaid
Middle Aged
Physicians
/ statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Telefacsimile
United States
Journal
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
ISSN: 2376-1032
Titre abrégé: J Manag Care Spec Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101644425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines (COB) can lead to additive respiratory and central nervous system effects, putting patients at increased risk of fatal overdose. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released an opioid-prescribing guideline recommending against COB, and the Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) endorsed a COB measure in its core opioid set. From May 1, 2017, to December 4, 2017, a California Medicaid plan launched a COB-focused prescriber outreach intervention for members receiving recent opioid and benzodiazepine claims with the intent of decreasing concurrent use. To assess the effect of a prescriber fax intervention by a Medicaid plan on COB. Two retrospective analyses were conducted using administrative pharmacy claims data: a comparison of the PQA COB rate among selected California Medicaid plans for 2016 and 2017 and a cohort utilization analysis of members identified for the fax intervention compared with controls. Intervention and control members were matched based on 12 pre-index utilization characteristics. Outcomes assessed included proportion of members with resolution of COB in the post-index period, change in mean number of COB days before and after the index date, and proportion of members with decreased benzodiazepine daily dose after the index date. Analyses were also performed for the subgroups of members with < 30 days of COB and ≥ 30 days of COB in the pre-index period. All California Medicaid plans in the study saw an improvement in the PQA COB rate between 2016 and 2017. In the utilization analysis, 4,182 intervention members were eligible according to study criteria and matched to similar control members. Many differences in medication use existed between the subgroups with < 30 days and ≥ 30 days of COB in the pre-index period, with the latter group consisting of much more chronic, complex users. The intervention cohort had a statistically significant higher proportion of members with complete resolution of COB compared with the control cohort (43.8% vs. 40.0%; Our analyses demonstrated that this low-touch prescriber fax intervention produced statistically significant improvements in COB outcomes, despite the overall trend of declining COB among the other California Medicaid plans. Low-touch, targeted prescriber outreach can be an inexpensive yet effective tool to affect prescriber behavior, particularly before COB becomes chronic. No outside funding was used to support this study. The authors do not have any financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. At the time of conducting this research, all authors were employees of MedImpact Healthcare Systems. The results of this study were presented at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2019; March 25-28, 2019; San Diego, CA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines (COB) can lead to additive respiratory and central nervous system effects, putting patients at increased risk of fatal overdose. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released an opioid-prescribing guideline recommending against COB, and the Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) endorsed a COB measure in its core opioid set. From May 1, 2017, to December 4, 2017, a California Medicaid plan launched a COB-focused prescriber outreach intervention for members receiving recent opioid and benzodiazepine claims with the intent of decreasing concurrent use.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effect of a prescriber fax intervention by a Medicaid plan on COB.
METHODS
METHODS
Two retrospective analyses were conducted using administrative pharmacy claims data: a comparison of the PQA COB rate among selected California Medicaid plans for 2016 and 2017 and a cohort utilization analysis of members identified for the fax intervention compared with controls. Intervention and control members were matched based on 12 pre-index utilization characteristics. Outcomes assessed included proportion of members with resolution of COB in the post-index period, change in mean number of COB days before and after the index date, and proportion of members with decreased benzodiazepine daily dose after the index date. Analyses were also performed for the subgroups of members with < 30 days of COB and ≥ 30 days of COB in the pre-index period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All California Medicaid plans in the study saw an improvement in the PQA COB rate between 2016 and 2017. In the utilization analysis, 4,182 intervention members were eligible according to study criteria and matched to similar control members. Many differences in medication use existed between the subgroups with < 30 days and ≥ 30 days of COB in the pre-index period, with the latter group consisting of much more chronic, complex users. The intervention cohort had a statistically significant higher proportion of members with complete resolution of COB compared with the control cohort (43.8% vs. 40.0%;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our analyses demonstrated that this low-touch prescriber fax intervention produced statistically significant improvements in COB outcomes, despite the overall trend of declining COB among the other California Medicaid plans. Low-touch, targeted prescriber outreach can be an inexpensive yet effective tool to affect prescriber behavior, particularly before COB becomes chronic.
DISCLOSURES
BACKGROUND
No outside funding was used to support this study. The authors do not have any financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. At the time of conducting this research, all authors were employees of MedImpact Healthcare Systems. The results of this study were presented at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2019; March 25-28, 2019; San Diego, CA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32011968
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.160
pmc: PMC10391025
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Benzodiazepines
12794-10-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
160-167Références
Clin J Pain. 2017 Nov;33(11):976-982
pubmed: 28145912
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Oct;21(10):938-44
pubmed: 26402392
Pain Med. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1148-1155
pubmed: 30204893
J Pain. 2017 Nov;18(11):1374-1383
pubmed: 28711636
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):447-54
pubmed: 24761816
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49
pubmed: 26987082
Clin Ther. 1995 May-Jun;17(3):525-33; discussion 516
pubmed: 7585856
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Oct;18(8):627-49
pubmed: 23127150
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Dec 21;9:49-54
pubmed: 29340270
J Pain. 2010 Apr;11(4):312-20
pubmed: 19944648
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:105-8
pubmed: 21935338
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):419-27
pubmed: 23881609
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:202-8
pubmed: 24679839
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180919
pubmed: 30646080
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 04;6:46
pubmed: 16595013
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar - Apr;59(2):238-242
pubmed: 30552053
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):439-46c
pubmed: 24761815
PM R. 2018 Sep 19;:
pubmed: 30243999
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Mar 04;13:32
pubmed: 23497373
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):134-41
pubmed: 22412005
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1286-93
pubmed: 27400458
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Apr;11(3):211-9
pubmed: 15804205
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):346-354
pubmed: 28230448
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;24(11):949-963
pubmed: 27567185
BMJ. 2015 Jun 10;350:h2698
pubmed: 26063215
Sleep. 2019 Apr 1;42(4):
pubmed: 30657987