Smartphone and Internet Access and Utilization by People With Schizophrenia in South Australia: Quantitative Survey Study.

computer internet schizoaffective disorder schizophrenia smartphone technology

Journal

JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 18 07 2018
accepted: 15 12 2018
revised: 29 11 2018
entrez: 4 2 2020
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 6 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Web-based information and interventions for mental illness are increasingly being provided. There is an expectation that citizens have access to the internet and are competent in using technology. People with schizophrenia are often excluded from social engagement, have cognitive impairment, and have very limited income, all of which may reduce their use of technology. This study aimed to investigate technology access, use of digital technology, and confidence in using technology among people with schizophrenia living in the community. Face-to-face structured interviews with 50 people with schizophrenia (aged 18-65 years) living in the northern suburbs of Adelaide, South Australia, were conducted using an instrument designed to assess technology access and utilization. Most participants (42/50, 84%) owned a mobile phone, but only 58% (29/50) owned a smartphone. Two-thirds of participants (33/50, 66%) had access to the internet at home, using a smartphone or computer. Moreover, 40% (20/50) of participants used the internet at least daily, but 30% (15/50) of participants had never accessed the internet from any device. Approximately half of the participants (24/50, 48%) had never used Facebook. Participants rarely used community facilities (eg, libraries and cafes) to access the internet. There were no significant differences (P values ranged from .14 to .70) between younger participants (aged 18-34 years) and older participants (aged 35-64 years) in internet or smartphone access or confidence in using technology. Although the sample size of this study is small, it shows limited technology access, use of digital technology, and confidence in using technology among the participants. This could be a barrier to the online delivery of information and interventions for people with schizophrenia. To better understand the impacts of such technological disadvantage and potential disparities in access and use of online resources, prospective studies should recruit a larger sample size and include control subjects matched for socioeconomic disadvantage.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Web-based information and interventions for mental illness are increasingly being provided. There is an expectation that citizens have access to the internet and are competent in using technology. People with schizophrenia are often excluded from social engagement, have cognitive impairment, and have very limited income, all of which may reduce their use of technology.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate technology access, use of digital technology, and confidence in using technology among people with schizophrenia living in the community.
METHODS METHODS
Face-to-face structured interviews with 50 people with schizophrenia (aged 18-65 years) living in the northern suburbs of Adelaide, South Australia, were conducted using an instrument designed to assess technology access and utilization.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most participants (42/50, 84%) owned a mobile phone, but only 58% (29/50) owned a smartphone. Two-thirds of participants (33/50, 66%) had access to the internet at home, using a smartphone or computer. Moreover, 40% (20/50) of participants used the internet at least daily, but 30% (15/50) of participants had never accessed the internet from any device. Approximately half of the participants (24/50, 48%) had never used Facebook. Participants rarely used community facilities (eg, libraries and cafes) to access the internet. There were no significant differences (P values ranged from .14 to .70) between younger participants (aged 18-34 years) and older participants (aged 35-64 years) in internet or smartphone access or confidence in using technology.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although the sample size of this study is small, it shows limited technology access, use of digital technology, and confidence in using technology among the participants. This could be a barrier to the online delivery of information and interventions for people with schizophrenia. To better understand the impacts of such technological disadvantage and potential disparities in access and use of online resources, prospective studies should recruit a larger sample size and include control subjects matched for socioeconomic disadvantage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32012068
pii: v7i1e11551
doi: 10.2196/11551
pmc: PMC7013647
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e11551

Informations de copyright

©Kwok Tung Gordon Ann Wong, Dennis Liu, Ryan Balzan, Daniel King, Cherrie Galletly. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 28.01.2020.

Références

Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):33-49
pubmed: 24129842
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jun;156(1):96-106
pubmed: 24746468
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Feb 28;225(3):458-63
pubmed: 25563669
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Feb 15;44(2):242-249
pubmed: 28637195
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(6):361-71
pubmed: 22797087
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):448-55
pubmed: 26400871
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Aug;204(8):620-9
pubmed: 26828911
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 15;15(11):e247
pubmed: 24240579
Schizophr Res. 2015 Dec;169(1-3):268-273
pubmed: 26527247
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Oct;22(7):430-5
pubmed: 26519378
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e74
pubmed: 21169177
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 01;13:279
pubmed: 24180273
Schizophr Res. 2013 Jan;143(1):143-9
pubmed: 23146146
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):89-95
pubmed: 22901437
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1244-53
pubmed: 24609454
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):1005-22
pubmed: 15954204
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 May 04;3(2):e15
pubmed: 27146094
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;53(3):221-238
pubmed: 29327166
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 05;15(4):e60
pubmed: 23563184
JMIR Ment Health. 2014 Dec 23;1(1):e5
pubmed: 26543905
J Ment Health. 2012 Aug;21(4):395-403
pubmed: 22712756

Auteurs

Kwok Tung Gordon Wong (KTG)

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Dennis Liu (D)

The University of Adelaide, Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, Australia.
Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.

Ryan Balzan (R)

The University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, Adelaide, Australia.
Flinders University, College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Adelaide, Australia.

Daniel King (D)

Flinders University, College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Adelaide, Australia.

Cherrie Galletly (C)

The University of Adelaide, Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, Australia.
Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, Adelaide, Australia.

Classifications MeSH