Screening University Students for Health Checks With an Electronic Health Questionnaire in Finland: Protocol for a Retrospective, Register-Based Cohort Study.
digitalization
electronic health questionnaire
health check
preventive health services
register study
screening
student health services
students
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jan 2020
29 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
02
05
2019
accepted:
12
11
2019
revised:
24
10
2019
entrez:
4
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health questionnaires and health checks are an established part of preventive health care services in Finland. However, only very limited research of these has been conducted. The Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) provides primary health care services to all bachelor's and master's degree university students (approximately 134,500 students) in Finland. FSHS's statutory health examination process of university entrants includes an electronic health questionnaire (eHQ) and, based on the students' eHQ responses, a subsequent health check if necessary. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been published on the use of questionnaires for screening students for general health checks. The general aim of the study is to evaluate the health examination process of university entrants. The objectives are to determine how students' self-reported health in the eHQ and participation in the health examination process are associated with graduation, mental health problems, and the use of student health care services. This is an ongoing, nationwide, retrospective, register-based cohort study with a 6-year follow-up. The study population is the cohort of university entrants (N=15,723) from the 2011-2012 academic year. These students were sent the eHQ, which consisted of 26 questions about health, health habits, social relations, and studying. Based on the eHQ responses, students were referred to one of the following interventions: (1) a health check, (2) an appointment other than a health check (eg, physiotherapy), or (3) electronic feedback to support a healthy lifestyle, when the other interventions were not necessary. Multiple comparisons will be made within these groups using logistic regression. The primary outcome variables are graduation, having a mental health problem, and attending a health check. The use of FSHS health care services will be studied with the cluster analysis method. The data have been obtained from three nationwide registers: the eHQ register, the medical records of FSHS, and the Higher education achievement register. The data have been linked using personal identity codes. As of August 2019, the data collection and processing are complete and the statistical analyses are in progress. Preliminary results are expected in autumn 2019. Further publications are expected in 2020, and two PhD theses are expected to be completed by the end of 2022. Studying practical procedures in primary health care is highly important for resource allocation and the development of evidence-based processes. This study will be the first to assess the usage of a health questionnaire in screening students for health checks. The findings of this study will contribute to the field of preventive health care. The main practical implication is the development of the FSHS's health examination process. We hypothesize that participation in the health examination process enhances academic achievement and the detection of university students' mental health problems early on in their studies. DERR1-10.2196/14535.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health questionnaires and health checks are an established part of preventive health care services in Finland. However, only very limited research of these has been conducted. The Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS) provides primary health care services to all bachelor's and master's degree university students (approximately 134,500 students) in Finland. FSHS's statutory health examination process of university entrants includes an electronic health questionnaire (eHQ) and, based on the students' eHQ responses, a subsequent health check if necessary. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been published on the use of questionnaires for screening students for general health checks.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The general aim of the study is to evaluate the health examination process of university entrants. The objectives are to determine how students' self-reported health in the eHQ and participation in the health examination process are associated with graduation, mental health problems, and the use of student health care services.
METHODS
METHODS
This is an ongoing, nationwide, retrospective, register-based cohort study with a 6-year follow-up. The study population is the cohort of university entrants (N=15,723) from the 2011-2012 academic year. These students were sent the eHQ, which consisted of 26 questions about health, health habits, social relations, and studying. Based on the eHQ responses, students were referred to one of the following interventions: (1) a health check, (2) an appointment other than a health check (eg, physiotherapy), or (3) electronic feedback to support a healthy lifestyle, when the other interventions were not necessary. Multiple comparisons will be made within these groups using logistic regression. The primary outcome variables are graduation, having a mental health problem, and attending a health check. The use of FSHS health care services will be studied with the cluster analysis method. The data have been obtained from three nationwide registers: the eHQ register, the medical records of FSHS, and the Higher education achievement register. The data have been linked using personal identity codes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As of August 2019, the data collection and processing are complete and the statistical analyses are in progress. Preliminary results are expected in autumn 2019. Further publications are expected in 2020, and two PhD theses are expected to be completed by the end of 2022.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Studying practical procedures in primary health care is highly important for resource allocation and the development of evidence-based processes. This study will be the first to assess the usage of a health questionnaire in screening students for health checks. The findings of this study will contribute to the field of preventive health care. The main practical implication is the development of the FSHS's health examination process. We hypothesize that participation in the health examination process enhances academic achievement and the detection of university students' mental health problems early on in their studies.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/14535.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32012093
pii: v9i1e14535
doi: 10.2196/14535
pmc: PMC7016620
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14535Informations de copyright
©Susanna Paldanius, Noora Seilo, Kristina Kunttu, Reija Autio, Minna Kaila. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 29.01.2020.
Références
Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804
pubmed: 8329970
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):391-400
pubmed: 23260171
Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(14):2955-2970
pubmed: 27484622
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 1;225:97-103
pubmed: 28802728
Psychiatr Prax. 2013 Jan;40(1):30-5
pubmed: 23319281
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;9(3):
pubmed: 28856843
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-53
pubmed: 24567582
J Public Health Med. 2000 Dec;22(4):492-9
pubmed: 11192277
J Am Coll Health. 2003 Jan;51(4):156-62
pubmed: 12735391
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):289-300
pubmed: 17310053
BMJ. 2012 Nov 20;345:e7191
pubmed: 23169868
Work. 2006;26(2):167-77
pubmed: 16477109
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):270
pubmed: 30170569
Glob Health Promot. 2009 Sep;16(3):35-44
pubmed: 19773299
Am J Public Health. 1973 Jul;63(7):610-8
pubmed: 4716372
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2542367
pubmed: 28752093
Arch Environ Health. 1963 May;6:573-8
pubmed: 13953923
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8
pubmed: 24025320