Brief Interventions for Cannabis Use in Healthcare Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials.
Journal
Journal of addiction medicine
ISSN: 1935-3227
Titre abrégé: J Addict Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101306759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
4
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
29
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The efficacy of brief interventions for cannabis use was assessed in a systematic review and meta-analyses. Systematic searches in academic databases were conducted, and reference lists of included studies were reviewed. Randomized trials were included that compared brief interventions with minimal control interventions for improving cannabis-specific outcomes among participants recruited from healthcare settings. Mean differences (MDs) based on change-from-baseline measurements were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses, with stratification by short term (≤3 months) and long term (>3 months). Ten reports from 9 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in the United States, including participants who were adults and were recruited from primary care or emergency departments. There were no significant effects of brief interventions on cannabis-specific Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) scores in the short term (MD -1.27 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.75, 1.21; I 84.40%). The null pattern of findings was also observed for number of days of cannabis use in the past 30 days in the short term (MD -0.22 days; 95% CI -2.27, 1.82; I 60.30%) and long term (MD -0.28 days; 95% CI -2.42, 1.86; I 60.50%). The evidence base for other outcomes not subjected to meta-analyses was limited and mixed. Brief interventions did not result in reductions in cannabis-specific ASSIST scores or number of days of cannabis use, whereas the evidence base for other outcomes was limited and mixed. As such, brief interventions in healthcare settings may not be efficacious for cannabis use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32012140
doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000527
pii: 01271255-202002000-00011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78-88Références
Babor TF, McRee BG, Kassebaum PA, et al. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abus 2007; 28:7–30.
Bernstein E, Edwards E, Dorfman D, et al. Screening and brief intervention to reduce marijuana use among youth and young adults in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16:1174–1185.
Blow FC, Walton MA, Bohnert ASB, et al. A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce drug use among adults in a low-income urban emergency department: the HealthiER You study. Addiction 2017; 112:1395–1405.
Bogenschutz MP, Donovan DM, Mandler RN, et al. Brief intervention for patients with problematic drug use presenting in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1736–1745.
Chatters R, Cooper K, Day E, et al. Psychological and psychosocial interventions for cannabis cessation in adults: a systematic review. Addict Res Theory 2016; 24:93–110.
Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954; 10:101–129.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7:177–188.
Fuster D, Cheng DM, Wang N, et al. Brief intervention for daily marijuana users identified by screening in primary care: a subgroup analysis of the ASPIRE randomized clinical trial. Subst Abus 2016; 37:336–342.
Gates PJ, Sabioni P, Copeland J, et al. Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; CD005336.
Government of Canada. Legalizing and Strictly Regulating Cannabis: The Facts; 2018. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/campaigns/legalizing-strictly-regulating-cannabis-facts.html. Accessed October 1, 2018.
Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72:757–766.
Hall W, Lynskey M. Why it is probably too soon to assess the public health effects of legalisation of recreational cannabis use in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3:900–906.
Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21:1539–1558.
Hingson R, Compton WM. Screening and brief intervention and referral to treatment for drug use in primary care: back to the drawing board. JAMA 2014; 312:488–489.
Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health-care settings in four countries. Addiction 2012; 107:957–966.
Imtiaz S, Shield KD, Roerecke M, et al. The burden of disease attributable to cannabis use in Canada in 2012. Addiction 2016; 111:653–662.
Kaner EF, Beyer F, Dickinson HO, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD004148.
Kerridge BT, Mauro PM, Chou SP, et al. Predictors of treatment utilization and barriers to treatment utilization among individuals with lifetime cannabis use disorder in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 181:223–228.
Mason MJ, Sabo R, Zaharakis NM. Peer network counseling as brief treatment for urban adolescent heavy cannabis users. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2017; 78:152–157.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000097.
Olmos A, Tirado-Munoz J, Farre M, et al. The efficacy of computerized interventions to reduce cannabis use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav 2018; 79:52–60.
Palfai TP, Saitz R, Winter M, et al. Web-based screening and brief intervention for student marijuana use in a university health center: pilot study to examine the implementation of eCHECKUP TO GO in different contexts. Addict Behav 2014; 39:1346–1352.
Parmar A, Sarkar S. Brief interventions for cannabis use disorders: a review. Addict Disord Treat 2017; 16:80–93.
Poblete F, Barticevic NA, Zuzulich MS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for alcohol and drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in primary health care in Chile. Addiction 2017; 112:1462–1469.
Saitz R. Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy drug use: little or no efficacy. Front Psychiatry 2014; 5:121.
Saitz R. Commentary on Gelberg et al. 2015: alcohol and other drug screening and brief intervention: evidence in crisis. Addiction 2015; 110:1791–1793.
Saitz R, Alford DP, Bernstein J, et al. Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy drug use in primary care settings: Randomized clinical trials are needed. J Addict Med 2010; 4:123–130.
Saitz R, Palfai TP, Cheng DM, et al. Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: the ASPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:502–513.
Tanner-Smith EE, Lipsey MW. Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat 2015; 51:1–18.
Walker DD, Stephens RS, Blevins CE, et al. Augmenting brief interventions for adolescent marijuana users: the impact of motivational check-ins. J Consult Clin Psychol 2016; 84:983–992.
Walton MA, Bohnert K, Resko S, et al. Computer and therapist based brief interventions among cannabis-using adolescents presenting to primary care: one year outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013; 132:646–653.