Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio.
Aged
Cardiac Catheterization
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Plaque, Atherosclerotic
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Tomography, Optical Coherence
coronary artery disease
fractional flow reserve
microvascular resistance
optical coherence tomography
quantitative flow ratio
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
received:
23
10
2019
accepted:
20
01
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
14
4
2021
entrez:
4
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to investigate that the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) might be associated with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined plaque vulnerability. Both functional stenosis severity and plaque instability are related to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Recent studies have shown an association between physiological stenosis severity and the presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). Measurement of QFR is a novel method for rapid computational estimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR). We investigated 327 de novo intermediate-to-severe coronary lesions in 295 stable patients who underwent OCT, FFR, and QFR computation. The lesions were divided into tertiles based on either the FFR or QFR. The OCT findings were compared among these tertiles of FFR and QFR. Each tertile was defined as follows: FFR-T1 (FFR < 0.72), FFR-T2 (0.72 ≤ FFR ≤ 0.79), and FFR-T3 (FFR > 0.79) and QFR-T1 (QFR < 0.73), QFR-T2 (0.73 ≤ QFR ≤ 0.78), and QFR-T3 (QFR > 0.78). The prevalence of OCT-defined TCFA showed graded differences in proportion to the QFR tertiles (25.0% vs. 12.8% vs. 6.6%, p = .003). An overall significant difference in the prevalence of TCFA was found among FFR tertiles (p = .048), although pairwise comparison did not show statistical significance. Compared with FFR-based classifications, the model that integrated the FFR and QFR categorization improved the incremental reclassification efficacy (relative integrated discrimination improvement, 0.069; p = .002; continuous net reclassification improvement, 0.356; p = .022) for predicting the presence of TCFA. OCT-defined plaque instability was associated with the QFR in angiographically intermediate-to-severe lesions. Compared with the FFR alone, the QFR can provide incremental efficacy in predicting the presence of TCFA.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
We sought to investigate that the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) might be associated with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined plaque vulnerability.
BACKGROUND
Both functional stenosis severity and plaque instability are related to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Recent studies have shown an association between physiological stenosis severity and the presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). Measurement of QFR is a novel method for rapid computational estimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR).
METHODS
We investigated 327 de novo intermediate-to-severe coronary lesions in 295 stable patients who underwent OCT, FFR, and QFR computation. The lesions were divided into tertiles based on either the FFR or QFR. The OCT findings were compared among these tertiles of FFR and QFR. Each tertile was defined as follows: FFR-T1 (FFR < 0.72), FFR-T2 (0.72 ≤ FFR ≤ 0.79), and FFR-T3 (FFR > 0.79) and QFR-T1 (QFR < 0.73), QFR-T2 (0.73 ≤ QFR ≤ 0.78), and QFR-T3 (QFR > 0.78).
RESULTS
The prevalence of OCT-defined TCFA showed graded differences in proportion to the QFR tertiles (25.0% vs. 12.8% vs. 6.6%, p = .003). An overall significant difference in the prevalence of TCFA was found among FFR tertiles (p = .048), although pairwise comparison did not show statistical significance. Compared with FFR-based classifications, the model that integrated the FFR and QFR categorization improved the incremental reclassification efficacy (relative integrated discrimination improvement, 0.069; p = .002; continuous net reclassification improvement, 0.356; p = .022) for predicting the presence of TCFA.
CONCLUSIONS
OCT-defined plaque instability was associated with the QFR in angiographically intermediate-to-severe lesions. Compared with the FFR alone, the QFR can provide incremental efficacy in predicting the presence of TCFA.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E238-E247Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Pijls NH, Tanaka N, Fearon WF. Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it? Eur Heart J. 2013;34(18):1335-1344.
De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208-1217.
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2024-2035.
Tu S, Barbato E, Koszegi Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(7):768-777.
Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3077-3087.
Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Lauri F, et al. Influence of microcirculatory dysfunction on angiography-based functional assessment of coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(8):741-753.
Prati F, Regar E, Mintz GS, et al. Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(4):401-415.
Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(5):1262-1275.
Johnson TW, Raber L, di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(31):2566-2584.
Usui E, Yonetsu T, Murai T, et al. Prevalence of thin-cap Fibroatheroma in relation to the severity of anatomical and physiological stenosis. Circ J. 2017;81(12):1816-1823.
Usui E, Yonetsu T, Kanaji Y, et al. Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity and microvascular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(20):2058-2068.
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation. 2002;105(21):2482-2486.
Murai T, Lee T, Kanaji Y, et al. The influence of elective percutaneous coronary intervention on microvascular resistance: a serial assessment using the index of microcirculatory resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;311(3):H520-H531.
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation. 2001;104(17):2003-2006.
Yong AS, Layland J, Fearon WF, et al. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):53-58.
Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, et al. Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(12):1058-1072.
Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Lee T, et al. In vivo critical fibrous cap thickness for rupture-prone coronary plaques assessed by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(10):1251-1259.
Shmilovich H, Cheng VY, Tamarappoo BK, et al. Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219(2):588-595.
Tian J, Dauerman H, Toma C, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of TCFA and degree of coronary artery stenosis: an OCT, IVUS, and angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(7):672-680.
Park HB, Heo R, o Hartaigh B, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(1):1-10.
Yong AS, Ho M, Shah MG, Ng MK, Fearon WF. Coronary microcirculatory resistance is independent of epicardial stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):103-108, S1-2.
Hoshino M, Usui E, Sugiyama T, Kanaji Y, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T. Prevalence of OCT-defined high-risk plaque in relation to physiological characteristics by fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020;73:331-332.
Ozaki Y, Tanaka A, Tanimoto T, et al. Thin-cap fibroatheroma as high-risk plaque for microvascular obstruction in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(6):620-627.