The Medical Device Applied to Uterine Fibroids Morcellation: Analysis of Critical Biological Issues and Drawbacks from A Medical-Legal Prospective.
Uterine fibroid
in bag morcellation
laparoscopic myomectomy
leiomyosarcoma
medical liability
power morcellation.
Journal
Current pharmaceutical design
ISSN: 1873-4286
Titre abrégé: Curr Pharm Des
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 9602487
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
07
12
2019
accepted:
27
01
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
entrez:
5
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Following the FDA safety communication of 2014 increasing attention has been to the treatment of uterine fibroids, due to the suspicion of a potential leiomyosarcoma (ULM). FDA banned the use of power morcellation in the US, since this technique is likely to spread malignant cells from an unsuspected ULM. We criticized the medical legal consequences of this banning among gynecologists and patients, focusing on the drawbacks of biology and surgery. The authors analyzed literature data on one side, on the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of leiomyoma and ULM, and the other side, on the power morcellations and related critical issues, trying to highlight their main controversial aspects and to outline the possible impact on patients and on medical responsibility. The alternative methods to power morcellation are more invasive surgical solutions (as mini laparotomy or culdotomy), which inevitably involve associated risks with the surgical procedure as such and always request the containing bags. Although the in-bag morcellation is a promising technique, currently the used devices are largely off-label. This highlights the surgical risk, in case of complications, of suffering for malpractice claims both for not having used a containment system, favoring the spread of the neoplasm, and for its off-label use. Since the diagnosis of ULM is by histology after surgery, the fear of legal consequences or medical malpractice for unknown ULM power morcellation, should be targeted to analyze, in terms of cost/benefit ratio, the surgical priority. It should focus on the prevention of the risk of having a rare and statistically limited ULM or on the surgical-related complications, often linked to a slowdown minimally invasive surgery, or on the use of the authorized in-bag morcellations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32013843
pii: CPD-EPUB-104193
doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200204093737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
318-325Informations de copyright
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.