Birth preparedness, complication readiness and associated factors among pregnant women in Agnuak zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a community based comparative cross-sectional study.
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Ethiopia
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Parturition
/ psychology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ psychology
Pregnant Women
/ psychology
Prenatal Care
/ psychology
Rural Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
Urban Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Agnuak zone
Birth preparedness
Comparative cross-sectional study
Complication readiness
Ethiopia
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2020
03 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2018
accepted:
23
01
2020
entrez:
5
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness interventions have a significant role in the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality risk. Inadequacy of birth and emergency preparedness were depicted as one of the major reasons for high maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. The main objective of this study was to assess birth preparedness, complication readiness and associated factors among pregnant women. A community based comparative cross-sectional study design was conducted among 411 urban and 209 rural respondents who were selected using multi-stage stratified random sampling technique. Quantitative data were collected by interviewer administered questionnaire while qualitative data were collected from purposely selected 54 members of the community by using guiding checklist and analyzed by thematic areas. Birth preparedness and complication readiness was measured using five birth preparedness and complication readiness items then women who scored at least three were considered as well prepared. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the association between independent variables and birth preparedness and complication readiness. The result were presented as Odds Ratio at 95% CI. P < 0.05 ware used to dictate statistical significance. A total response rate of the study was 97.3%. The prevalence of birth preparedness and complication readiness was significantly higher among urban respondents (P = 25.8%; p < 0.05). Factors such as history of obstetric complication, knowledge of key danger signs, having favourable attitude towards birth preparedness and complication readiness, starting antenatal care visit within 3 months age of pregnancy, completing at least four antenatal care visits, urban residence, having occupation of government employee or merchant and being in the higher wealth quintile were variables positively associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness. Prevalence of birth preparedness and complication readiness was low in this study, though significantly higher in urban area. Three-fourth of women planned to attend 4+ antenatal care visits indicating opportunity to counsel them on birth preparedness and complication readiness which increases its prevalence. Health workers should counsel every woman on birth preparedness and complication readiness components during her first antenatal care visit and subsequent visits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness interventions have a significant role in the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality risk. Inadequacy of birth and emergency preparedness were depicted as one of the major reasons for high maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. The main objective of this study was to assess birth preparedness, complication readiness and associated factors among pregnant women.
METHODS
METHODS
A community based comparative cross-sectional study design was conducted among 411 urban and 209 rural respondents who were selected using multi-stage stratified random sampling technique. Quantitative data were collected by interviewer administered questionnaire while qualitative data were collected from purposely selected 54 members of the community by using guiding checklist and analyzed by thematic areas. Birth preparedness and complication readiness was measured using five birth preparedness and complication readiness items then women who scored at least three were considered as well prepared. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the association between independent variables and birth preparedness and complication readiness. The result were presented as Odds Ratio at 95% CI. P < 0.05 ware used to dictate statistical significance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total response rate of the study was 97.3%. The prevalence of birth preparedness and complication readiness was significantly higher among urban respondents (P = 25.8%; p < 0.05). Factors such as history of obstetric complication, knowledge of key danger signs, having favourable attitude towards birth preparedness and complication readiness, starting antenatal care visit within 3 months age of pregnancy, completing at least four antenatal care visits, urban residence, having occupation of government employee or merchant and being in the higher wealth quintile were variables positively associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Prevalence of birth preparedness and complication readiness was low in this study, though significantly higher in urban area. Three-fourth of women planned to attend 4+ antenatal care visits indicating opportunity to counsel them on birth preparedness and complication readiness which increases its prevalence. Health workers should counsel every woman on birth preparedness and complication readiness components during her first antenatal care visit and subsequent visits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32013891
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2766-9
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-2766-9
pmc: PMC6998184
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72Références
Reprod Health. 2011 Nov 16;8:33
pubmed: 22087791
Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64
pubmed: 11377642
Reprod Health. 2015 May 16;12:44
pubmed: 25981513
Afr J Reprod Health. 2010 Mar;14(1):21-32
pubmed: 20695136
Int Sch Res Notices. 2016 Sep 18;2016:8727365
pubmed: 27722201
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):174-82
pubmed: 25546037
J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Dec;24(4):403-12
pubmed: 17591337
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Nov 12;19:272
pubmed: 25870727
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 04;14:129
pubmed: 24708719
J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Dec;24(4):489-97
pubmed: 17591346
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Oct;85(10):745-54
pubmed: 18038055