Thirst-guided participant-controlled intravenous fluid rehydration: a single blind, randomised crossover study.

body water dehydration fluid therapy osmolar concentration patient-controlled surgery thirst trauma

Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 18 09 2019
revised: 01 11 2019
accepted: 12 12 2019
entrez: 5 2 2020
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 6 2 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Dehydration is common in hospitals and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Clinical assessment and diagnostic measures of dehydration are unreliable. We sought to investigate the novel concept that individuals might control their own intravenous rehydration, guided by thirst. We performed a single-blind, counterbalanced, randomised cross-over trial. Ten healthy male volunteers of mean age 26 (standard deviation [sd] 10.5) yr were dehydrated by 3-5% of their baseline body mass via exercising in the heat (35°C, 60% humidity). This was followed by a 4 h participant-controlled intravenous rehydration: individuals triggered up to six fluid boluses (4% dextrose in 0.18% sodium chloride) per hour in response to thirst. Participants undertook two blinded rehydration protocols which differed only by bolus volume: 50 ml (low volume [LV]) or 200 ml (high volume [HV]). Each hour during the rehydration phase, plasma osmolality (pOsm) was measured and thirst score recorded. Nude body mass was measured at baseline, after dehydration, and after the rehydration phase. In both conditions, the mean dehydration-related body mass loss was 3.9%. Thirst score was strongly associated with pOsm (within-subject r=0.74) and demand for fluid decreased as pOsm corrected. In the HV condition, participants rapidly rehydrated themselves (mean fluid delivered 3060 vs 981 ml in the LV condition) to body mass and pOsm no different to their euhydrated state. Healthy individuals appear able to rely on thirst to manage intravenous fluid intake. Future work must now focus on whether patient-controlled intravenous fluids could represent a paradigm shift in the management of hydration in the clinical setting. NCT03932890.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dehydration is common in hospitals and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Clinical assessment and diagnostic measures of dehydration are unreliable. We sought to investigate the novel concept that individuals might control their own intravenous rehydration, guided by thirst.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a single-blind, counterbalanced, randomised cross-over trial. Ten healthy male volunteers of mean age 26 (standard deviation [sd] 10.5) yr were dehydrated by 3-5% of their baseline body mass via exercising in the heat (35°C, 60% humidity). This was followed by a 4 h participant-controlled intravenous rehydration: individuals triggered up to six fluid boluses (4% dextrose in 0.18% sodium chloride) per hour in response to thirst. Participants undertook two blinded rehydration protocols which differed only by bolus volume: 50 ml (low volume [LV]) or 200 ml (high volume [HV]). Each hour during the rehydration phase, plasma osmolality (pOsm) was measured and thirst score recorded. Nude body mass was measured at baseline, after dehydration, and after the rehydration phase.
RESULTS RESULTS
In both conditions, the mean dehydration-related body mass loss was 3.9%. Thirst score was strongly associated with pOsm (within-subject r=0.74) and demand for fluid decreased as pOsm corrected. In the HV condition, participants rapidly rehydrated themselves (mean fluid delivered 3060 vs 981 ml in the LV condition) to body mass and pOsm no different to their euhydrated state.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Healthy individuals appear able to rely on thirst to manage intravenous fluid intake. Future work must now focus on whether patient-controlled intravenous fluids could represent a paradigm shift in the management of hydration in the clinical setting.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT03932890.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32014238
pii: S0007-0912(19)30974-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.008
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03932890']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jonathan Lacey (J)

Institute of Sport Exercise & Health, University College London, London, UK; St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: jonathan.lacey.16@ucl.ac.uk.

Jo Corbett (J)

Department of Sport & Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Ant Shepherd (A)

Department of Sport & Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Andre Dubois (A)

British Antarctic Survey Medical Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.

Fintan Hughes (F)

Institute of Sport Exercise & Health, University College London, London, UK.

Danny White (D)

Department of Sport & Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Mike Tipton (M)

Department of Sport & Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Michael Mythen (M)

Institute of Sport Exercise & Health, University College London, London, UK.

Hugh Montgomery (H)

Institute of Sport Exercise & Health, University College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH