Stability of neuropsychological test performance in older adults serving as normative controls for a study on postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
Cognitive ageing
Computerized testing
Neuropsychological testing
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction
Test–retest reliability
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Feb 2020
04 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
01
08
2019
accepted:
24
01
2020
entrez:
6
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
24
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) rely on repeat neuropsychological testing. The stability of the applied instruments, which are affected by natural variability in performance and measurement imprecision, is often unclear. We determined the stability of a neuropsychological test battery using a sample of older adults from the general population. Forty-five participants aged 65 to 89 years performed six computerized and non-computerized neuropsychological tests at baseline and again at 7 day and 3 months follow-up sessions. Mean scores on each test were compared across time points using repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) with pairwise comparison. Two-way mixed effects, absolute agreement analyses of variance intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) determined test-retest reliability. All tests had moderate to excellent test-retest reliability during 7-day (ICC range 0.63 to 0.94; all p < 0.01) and 3-month intervals (ICC range 0.60 to 0.92; all p < 0.01) though confidence intervals of ICC estimates were large throughout. Practice effects apparent at 7 days eased off by 3 months. No substantial differences between computerized and non-computerized tests were observed. We conclude that the present six-test neuropsychological test battery is appropriate for use in POCD research though small sample size of our study needs to be recognized as a limitation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02265263 (15th October 2014).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32019577
doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-4919-3
pii: 10.1186/s13104-020-4919-3
pmc: PMC7001199
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02265263']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
55Subventions
Organisme : Seventh Framework Programme
ID : HEALTH-F2-2014-602461
Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Sep;36(9):915-23
pubmed: 9740364
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:145-156
pubmed: 30096414
Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb;30(2):284-317
pubmed: 26956931
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 6;16(1):175
pubmed: 30189867
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Sep;32(6):643-51
pubmed: 26890984
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Oct;49(9):1232-5
pubmed: 16146457
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Mar;45(3):275-89
pubmed: 11207462
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(3):319-28
pubmed: 23444947
Assessment. 2014 Dec;21(6):723-30
pubmed: 24590077
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;50:34-39
pubmed: 29398565
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):30-6
pubmed: 25788770
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017 May 18;13:27-42
pubmed: 28603544
Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):509-16
pubmed: 12206571
J Anesth. 2010 Aug;24(4):518-25
pubmed: 20508953
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154222
pubmed: 27110937
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jun 09;7:112
pubmed: 26106326
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(4):251-63
pubmed: 26574661
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Sep;35(9):1000-10
pubmed: 25698717
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1005-1012
pubmed: 30336844
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Jun;73(6):2005-11
pubmed: 12078822
Psychol Aging. 2002 Jun;17(2):179-93
pubmed: 12061405