First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Temozolomide
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Bevacizumab
Glioblastoma
Radiotherapy
Survival
Temozolomide
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
24
09
2019
accepted:
09
11
2019
entrez:
6
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
First-line bevacizumab (BEV) is now available as a treatment option for glioblastoma patients with severe clinical conditions in Japan. However, the survival benefits remain controversial. To elucidate these potential survival benefits, we retrospectively analyzed survival in glioblastoma patients receiving BEV. We analyzed survival in 120 patients with IDH-wild type glioblastoma treated from 2002 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in three treatment era subgroups [pre-temozolomide (TMZ), TMZ, and TMZ-BEV], and the correlations of prognostic factors with survival were evaluated. An improvement in survival was observed after BEV approval (median OS in the pre-TMZ, TMZ, and TMZ-BEV eras: 14.6, 14.9, and 22.1 months, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards model identified extent of resection and MGMT methylation status as significant prognostic factors in the TMZ era; however, these factors were not significant in the TMZ-BEV era. In subgroup analyses, patients with MGMT methylation had improved OS after TMZ introduction (pre-TMZ vs. TMZ, 18.5 vs. 28.1 months; P = 0.13), and those without MGMT methylation had significantly increased OS after BEV approval (TMZ vs. TMZ-BEV, 12.2 vs. 16.7 months; P = 0.04). Our findings imply that optional first-line administration of BEV can overcome the impact of conventional risk factors and prolong survival complementary to TMZ. The patient subgroups benefitting from TMZ and BEV did not seem to overlap, and stratification based on risk factors, including MGMT methylation status, might be effective for selecting patients in whom BEV should be preferentially used as a first-line therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32020475
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03339-0
pii: 10.1007/s11060-019-03339-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451-458Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP16K10779
Références
Neuropathology. 2017 Jun;37(3):191-199
pubmed: 27792249
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jan;17(1):45-52
pubmed: 25140036
Neuropathology. 2017 Jun;37(3):200-206
pubmed: 28116838
Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1807-12
pubmed: 18772396
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Sep;18(9):1313-8
pubmed: 27006178
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 7;8(34):57337-57344
pubmed: 28915674
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1027-1037
pubmed: 28296618
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316
pubmed: 29260225
Cancer Med. 2014 Jun;3(3):660-6
pubmed: 24610705
Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;119(19):3489-95
pubmed: 23868553
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Dec 01;11:1759-65
pubmed: 26664126
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011 Feb;28(1):25-31
pubmed: 21249460
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2735-44
pubmed: 26124478
J Neurooncol. 2005 Mar;72(1):57-62
pubmed: 15803376
Cancer Cell. 2012 Oct 16;22(4):425-37
pubmed: 23079654
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2017 Jul;34(3):103-112
pubmed: 28447171
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0160489
pubmed: 27529619
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Aug 08;4(1):79
pubmed: 27503138
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Jan 18;10:429-437
pubmed: 28176936
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708
pubmed: 24552317
J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Jul 09;:
pubmed: 30035459
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;6(1):105-110
pubmed: 28123740
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44015-44031
pubmed: 28467795
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):709-22
pubmed: 24552318