Access to healthcare for deaf people: a model from a middle-income country in Latin America.
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Chile
/ epidemiology
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Persons With Hearing Impairments
/ statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Socioeconomic Factors
Young Adult
Journal
Revista de saude publica
ISSN: 1518-8787
Titre abrégé: Rev Saude Publica
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 0135043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
23
06
2019
accepted:
22
07
2019
entrez:
6
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine if there are existing healthcare access inequities among the deaf Chilean population when compared to the general Chilean population. Data were obtained from a population-based national survey in Chile. In total, 745 prelingually deaf individuals were identified. The number of times the person used the healthcare system was dichotomized and analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Prelingually deaf people had lower incomes, fewer years of education, and greater rates of unemployment and poverty when compared with the general population. Moreover, they visited more general practitioners, mental health specialists, and other medical specialists. On average, they attended more appointments for depression but had fewer general checkups and gynecological appointments than the general population. Deaf people in Chile have a lower socioeconomic status than the rest of the Chilean population. The results from this study are similar to the findings reported for high-income countries, despite differences in the magnitude of the associations between being deaf and healthcare access. Further studies should be conducted to determine the health status of deaf people in Chile and other Latin American countries and what factors are associated with a significantly lower prevalence of gynecological appointments among deaf women when compared with non-deaf women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32022141
pii: S0034-89102020000100211
doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001864
pmc: PMC6986863
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13Références
J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Apr;12(4):183-9
pubmed: 11332518
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;40(9):737-42
pubmed: 16143834
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Jan;21(1):1-10
pubmed: 26405210
Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):573-8
pubmed: 26166160
Rev Med Chil. 2013 Sep;141(9):1095-106
pubmed: 24522412
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):962-70
pubmed: 24603316
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Oct;45(5):824-30
pubmed: 21808834
JAMA. 2013 Jun 12;309(22):2322-4
pubmed: 23757078
Am Ann Deaf. 2007 Fall;152(4):382-90
pubmed: 18257507
Psychosom Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;64(1):61-70
pubmed: 11818587
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jul;151(1):29-41
pubmed: 24671458
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Dec;53(12):2140-1
pubmed: 18077753
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Winter;12(1):1-7
pubmed: 16950865
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 17;355(7):695-703
pubmed: 16914705
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 25;5(1):e006668
pubmed: 25619200
Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1037-44
pubmed: 22423884
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1340-50
pubmed: 21067349
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):146-52
pubmed: 22197756
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2235-8
pubmed: 22021296