Gradients in the mammalian cerebellar cortex enable Fourier-like transformation and improve storing capacity.


Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 02 2020
Historique:
received: 10 09 2019
accepted: 20 12 2019
entrez: 6 2 2020
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 10 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cerebellar granule cells (GCs) make up the majority of all neurons in the vertebrate brain, but heterogeneities among GCs and potential functional consequences are poorly understood. Here, we identified unexpected gradients in the biophysical properties of GCs in mice. GCs closer to the white matter (inner-zone GCs) had higher firing thresholds and could sustain firing with larger current inputs than GCs closer to the Purkinje cell layer (outer-zone GCs). Dynamic Clamp experiments showed that inner- and outer-zone GCs preferentially respond to high- and low-frequency mossy fiber inputs, respectively, enabling dispersion of the mossy fiber input into its frequency components as performed by a Fourier transformation. Furthermore, inner-zone GCs have faster axonal conduction velocity and elicit faster synaptic potentials in Purkinje cells. Neuronal network modeling revealed that these gradients improve spike-timing precision of Purkinje cells and decrease the number of GCs required to learn spike-sequences. Thus, our study uncovers biophysical gradients in the cerebellar cortex enabling a Fourier-like transformation of mossy fiber inputs. The timing of movements such as posture, balance and speech are coordinated by a region of the brain called the cerebellum. Although this part of the brain is small, it contains a huge number of tiny nerve cells known as granule cells. These cells make up more than half the nerve cells in the human brain. But why there are so many is not well understood.The cerebellum receives signals from sensory organs, such as the ears and eyes, which are passed on as electrical pulses from nerve to nerve until they reach the granule cells. These electrical pulses can have very different repetition rates, ranging from one pulse to a thousand pulses per second. Previous studies have suggested that granule cells are a uniform population that can detect specific patterns within these electrical pulses. However, this would require granule cells to identify patterns in signals that have a range of different repetition rates, which is difficult for individual nerve cells to do.To investigate if granule cells are indeed a uniform population, Straub, Witter, Eshra, Hoidis et al. measured the electrical properties of granule cells from the cerebellum of mice. This revealed that granule cells have different electrical properties depending on how deep they are within the cerebellum. These differences enabled the granule cells to detect sensory signals that had specific repetition rates: signals that contained lots of repeats per second were relayed by granule cells in the lower layers of the cerebellum, while signals that contained fewer repeats were relayed by granule cells in the outer layers.This ability to separate signals based on their rate of repetition is similar to how digital audio files are compressed into an MP3. Computer simulations suggested that having granule cells that can detect specific rates of repetition improves the storage capacity of the brain.These findings further our understanding of how the cerebellum works and the cellular mechanisms that underlie how humans learn and memorize the timing of movement. This mechanism of separating signals to improve storage capacity may apply to other regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus, where differences between nerve cells have also recently been reported.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The timing of movements such as posture, balance and speech are coordinated by a region of the brain called the cerebellum. Although this part of the brain is small, it contains a huge number of tiny nerve cells known as granule cells. These cells make up more than half the nerve cells in the human brain. But why there are so many is not well understood.The cerebellum receives signals from sensory organs, such as the ears and eyes, which are passed on as electrical pulses from nerve to nerve until they reach the granule cells. These electrical pulses can have very different repetition rates, ranging from one pulse to a thousand pulses per second. Previous studies have suggested that granule cells are a uniform population that can detect specific patterns within these electrical pulses. However, this would require granule cells to identify patterns in signals that have a range of different repetition rates, which is difficult for individual nerve cells to do.To investigate if granule cells are indeed a uniform population, Straub, Witter, Eshra, Hoidis et al. measured the electrical properties of granule cells from the cerebellum of mice. This revealed that granule cells have different electrical properties depending on how deep they are within the cerebellum. These differences enabled the granule cells to detect sensory signals that had specific repetition rates: signals that contained lots of repeats per second were relayed by granule cells in the lower layers of the cerebellum, while signals that contained fewer repeats were relayed by granule cells in the outer layers.This ability to separate signals based on their rate of repetition is similar to how digital audio files are compressed into an MP3. Computer simulations suggested that having granule cells that can detect specific rates of repetition improves the storage capacity of the brain.These findings further our understanding of how the cerebellum works and the cellular mechanisms that underlie how humans learn and memorize the timing of movement. This mechanism of separating signals to improve storage capacity may apply to other regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus, where differences between nerve cells have also recently been reported.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32022688
doi: 10.7554/eLife.51771
pii: 51771
pmc: PMC7002074
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2020, Straub et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

IS, LW, AE, MH, NB, SM, ID, KD, ES, IB, MK, PI, SH No competing interests declared

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2389-94
pubmed: 19164536
J Neurosci. 2007 Jun 20;27(25):6832-42
pubmed: 17581971
J Physiol. 1980 Aug;305:197-213
pubmed: 7441553
Nature. 2006 Feb 23;439(7079):983-7
pubmed: 16496000
Neural Comput. 2001 Apr;13(4):751-63
pubmed: 11255567
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct 26;20(11):1483-1492
pubmed: 29073648
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:423-53
pubmed: 3284447
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 8;26(45):11786-97
pubmed: 17093099
Prog Neurobiol. 1991;36(6):437-63
pubmed: 1947173
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):496-508
pubmed: 31719168
Neuron. 2014 Aug 20;83(4):960-74
pubmed: 25123311
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 29;32(9):3267-80
pubmed: 22378898
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):13014-7
pubmed: 7809165
J Neurosci. 2017 May 3;37(18):4751-4765
pubmed: 28389475
Neuron. 2016 Dec 7;92(5):959-967
pubmed: 27839999
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(4):e1002448
pubmed: 22570592
Front Neural Circuits. 2013 Aug 21;7:133
pubmed: 23970855
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Apr;21(4):484-493
pubmed: 29593317
Nature. 2017 Apr 6;544(7648):96-100
pubmed: 28321129
J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;71(1):401-19
pubmed: 8158238
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 3;8(1):17561
pubmed: 30510282
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul 8;41:233-253
pubmed: 29986160
Neuron. 2018 Aug 8;99(3):564-575.e2
pubmed: 30017394
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105633
pubmed: 25144311
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2232-47
pubmed: 21795616
Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(2):414-7
pubmed: 2411585
Neuron. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):76-90.e4
pubmed: 30472076
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb;17(2):289-95
pubmed: 24413696
J Physiol. 2000 Nov 15;529 Pt 1:205-13
pubmed: 11080262
Neuron. 2004 Sep 2;43(5):745-57
pubmed: 15339654
J Physiol. 2001 Sep 1;535(Pt 2):445-72
pubmed: 11533136
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):439-42
pubmed: 26469054
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4736-40
pubmed: 8197127
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Jan;69(1):74-94
pubmed: 8433135
J Physiol. 2005 Mar 1;563(Pt 2):369-78
pubmed: 15613376
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1329-34
pubmed: 16136036
Neuron. 1993 Oct;11(4):759-69
pubmed: 8398158
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:409-41
pubmed: 7605068
J Comp Neurol. 1972 Nov;146(3):335-54
pubmed: 4628749
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1245-8
pubmed: 18097412
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):557-60
pubmed: 17148287
J Anat. 1957 Jul;91(3):299-313
pubmed: 13448989
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Dec 11;7:179
pubmed: 24376415
J Neurosci. 2000 Jul 15;20(14):5516-25
pubmed: 10884335
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jul;20(7):943-950
pubmed: 28530663
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jan;11(1):30-43
pubmed: 19997115
Neuron. 2016 Sep 21;91(6):1330-1341
pubmed: 27593180
Cerebellum. 2015 Oct;14(5):506-15
pubmed: 25735968
Cell Rep. 2013 Apr 25;3(4):1239-51
pubmed: 23583179
Elife. 2016 Jul 26;5:
pubmed: 27458803
Neuron. 2016 Feb 3;89(3):645-57
pubmed: 26844836
Biol Cybern. 1982;45(3):195-206
pubmed: 7171642
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 20;11(10):e1004515
pubmed: 26484859
Neuron. 2014 Sep 3;83(5):1213-26
pubmed: 25155954
Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):718-27
pubmed: 25821914
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 5;28(10):2301-12
pubmed: 18322077
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 21;13(9):e1005754
pubmed: 28934196
eNeuro. 2017 Oct 23;4(5):
pubmed: 29085905
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2):e1002919
pubmed: 23436991
J Comp Neurol. 2011 Apr 1;519(5):874-99
pubmed: 21280042
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 2;36(44):11196-11207
pubmed: 27807163
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Apr 8;342(2):206-20
pubmed: 8201032
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Aug;33:150-5
pubmed: 25884963
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Apr;20(4):193-204
pubmed: 30778192
Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 09;3:31
pubmed: 19915731
Nature. 1992 Jan 9;355(6356):163-6
pubmed: 1370344
Science. 2007 Mar 23;315(5819):1719-22
pubmed: 17379810
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 09;6:6464
pubmed: 25751648
Elife. 2019 May 03;8:
pubmed: 31050648
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Jul;32(7):1222-32
pubmed: 22434069
Elife. 2017 Oct 09;6:
pubmed: 28990927
Science. 2008 Aug 15;321(5891):977-80
pubmed: 18703744
J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(2):437-70
pubmed: 5784296
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Oct;26(8):2279-92
pubmed: 17953620
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 24;8(1):1116
pubmed: 29061964
Elife. 2018 Apr 16;7:
pubmed: 29659351
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 1;20(5):1837-48
pubmed: 10684885
Nat Neurosci. 2018 May;21(5):725-735
pubmed: 29662214
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Feb 24;9:47
pubmed: 25759640
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:179-207; discussion 207-11
pubmed: 2075953
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:307-40
pubmed: 15217335
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1183-98
pubmed: 8813282
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002979
pubmed: 23516353
Synapse. 2016 Jul;70(7):269-76
pubmed: 26887562
Bioinformatics. 2011 Sep 1;27(17):2453-4
pubmed: 21727141
Brain Res. 1971 Nov;34(1):1-18
pubmed: 5124919
J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 15;17(12):4517-26
pubmed: 9169512
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;34(45):14845-53
pubmed: 25378152
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Apr;21(8):2285-90
pubmed: 15869526
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):856-60
pubmed: 15103377
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;22(22):9668-78
pubmed: 12427822
Elife. 2014 May 07;3:e02536
pubmed: 24843004
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):719-23
pubmed: 9012851
Neuroscience. 1993 Mar;53(1):121-30
pubmed: 8097019
J Physiol. 2016 May 15;594(10):2729-49
pubmed: 26918702
Network. 2012;23(1-2):48-58
pubmed: 22568695
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 17;106(11):4471-6
pubmed: 19234116
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;110(2):322-33
pubmed: 23596337
Nat Neurosci. 2017 May;20(5):727-734
pubmed: 28319608
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):619-35
pubmed: 22895474
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1081-91
pubmed: 9463463
Elife. 2016 Mar 16;5:null
pubmed: 26982219
J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 25;34(26):8800-12
pubmed: 24966380
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 6;27(3):415-422
pubmed: 28111148
Neuron. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):584-602
pubmed: 30790539
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Mar 19;9:93
pubmed: 25852483
J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 20;31(29):10463-73
pubmed: 21775592
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Jul 16;13:289
pubmed: 31379501
Cerebellum. 2018 Oct;17(5):654-682
pubmed: 29876802
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 May 22;7:64
pubmed: 23720626
J Comp Neurol. 1998 Apr 13;393(3):353-73
pubmed: 9548555
Neuron. 2014 Oct 1;84(1):152-163
pubmed: 25220814
Neuron. 2010 Nov 18;68(4):710-23
pubmed: 21092860
Neuron. 2007 Apr 5;54(1):121-36
pubmed: 17408582
F1000Res. 2018 Jul 26;7:
pubmed: 30109024
J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28(3):599-620
pubmed: 5835487
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jan;29(1):87-96
pubmed: 19087162
Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Jun;20(2):229-45; discussion 245-77
pubmed: 10096998

Auteurs

Isabelle Straub (I)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Laurens Witter (L)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Abdelmoneim Eshra (A)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Miriam Hoidis (M)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Niklas Byczkowicz (N)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Sebastian Maas (S)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Igor Delvendahl (I)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Kevin Dorgans (K)

Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Elise Savier (E)

Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Ingo Bechmann (I)

Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Martin Krueger (M)

Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Philippe Isope (P)

Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Stefan Hallermann (S)

Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH