Model of goal directed behavior for limiting Latino preschoolers' television viewing: validity and reliability.
Child health
Health behavior
Model of goal directed behavior
Parenting
Preschoolers
TV viewing
Theory of planned behavior
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2020
05 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
08
08
2019
accepted:
24
01
2020
entrez:
7
2
2020
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
15
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurately measuring parents' attitudes and beliefs regarding limiting their children's TV viewing is important to inform the design and evaluation of effective interventions. This manuscript assesses the internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity of the Model of Goal Directed Behavior (MGDB) scales among parents of Latino preschoolers to characterize Latino parents' attitudes and beliefs toward limiting their preschoolers' TV viewing. Participants included parents of Latino preschoolers in the United States, 3-5 years old (n = 186). Parents completed a socio-demographic survey and the 105-item MGDB questionnaire (Attitudes, Perceived Positive/Negative Behavioral Control, Subjective Norms, Positive and Negative Anticipated Emotions, Habits, Self-Efficacy, Desires, and Intentions surrounding their child's TV viewing) which was used to measure internal consistency reliability and construct validity. A subsample of participants completed the questionnaire twice to measure test-retest reliability. Further, parents completed a 7-day TV viewing diary for their preschooler, and a TV parenting practices questionnaire as measures of convergent validity. Internal consistency reliability was generally acceptable for the MGDB scales (Cronbach's alphas> 0.7), except for the Desires scale, which was revealed to have two factors and the Attitudes and Perceived Behavioral Control scales. Test-retest reliability over 2 months had negligible to moderate correlations (r's = 0.28 to 0.61). Two structural equation models were conducted. One yielded acceptable model fit (x Initial reliability and validity for some of the MGDB scales appear acceptable among parents of Latino preschoolers. Refinement of the instrument and testing among larger samples is necessary to fully evaluate psychometric properties. This instrument may be useful for characterizing Latino parents' attitudes and beliefs toward limiting their preschoolers' TV viewing and informing future TV reduction interventions. Clinical Trials NCT01216306 Registered October 6, 2010.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accurately measuring parents' attitudes and beliefs regarding limiting their children's TV viewing is important to inform the design and evaluation of effective interventions. This manuscript assesses the internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity of the Model of Goal Directed Behavior (MGDB) scales among parents of Latino preschoolers to characterize Latino parents' attitudes and beliefs toward limiting their preschoolers' TV viewing.
METHOD
METHODS
Participants included parents of Latino preschoolers in the United States, 3-5 years old (n = 186). Parents completed a socio-demographic survey and the 105-item MGDB questionnaire (Attitudes, Perceived Positive/Negative Behavioral Control, Subjective Norms, Positive and Negative Anticipated Emotions, Habits, Self-Efficacy, Desires, and Intentions surrounding their child's TV viewing) which was used to measure internal consistency reliability and construct validity. A subsample of participants completed the questionnaire twice to measure test-retest reliability. Further, parents completed a 7-day TV viewing diary for their preschooler, and a TV parenting practices questionnaire as measures of convergent validity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Internal consistency reliability was generally acceptable for the MGDB scales (Cronbach's alphas> 0.7), except for the Desires scale, which was revealed to have two factors and the Attitudes and Perceived Behavioral Control scales. Test-retest reliability over 2 months had negligible to moderate correlations (r's = 0.28 to 0.61). Two structural equation models were conducted. One yielded acceptable model fit (x
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Initial reliability and validity for some of the MGDB scales appear acceptable among parents of Latino preschoolers. Refinement of the instrument and testing among larger samples is necessary to fully evaluate psychometric properties. This instrument may be useful for characterizing Latino parents' attitudes and beliefs toward limiting their preschoolers' TV viewing and informing future TV reduction interventions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinical Trials NCT01216306 Registered October 6, 2010.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32024491
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8268-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8268-x
pmc: PMC7003399
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01216306']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K07 CA131178
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K07CA131178
Pays : United States
Références
J Sch Health. 2013 Mar;83(3):157-63
pubmed: 23343316
Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Jan;39(1):141-9
pubmed: 22066521
Child Obes. 2013 Oct;9(5):446-53
pubmed: 24028564
Appetite. 2012 Apr;58(2):444-9
pubmed: 22210348
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;40(Pt 1):79-98
pubmed: 11329835
Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;10(Pt 4):505-30
pubmed: 16238862
Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):e1006-15
pubmed: 17473074
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):584-592
pubmed: 26572093
Child Obes. 2013 Feb;9(1):29-34
pubmed: 23270534
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Sep 22;10:110
pubmed: 24053779
Acta Paediatr. 2015 Mar;104(3):300-5
pubmed: 25424888
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):285-301
pubmed: 26462456
J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;150(1):12-17.e2
pubmed: 17188605
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Apr 02;10:41
pubmed: 23548115
Obes Rev. 2018 Jun;19(6):810-824
pubmed: 29573189
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jul;(157):1-8
pubmed: 25007319
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14
pubmed: 24570244
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;173(4):391-393
pubmed: 30776061
Appetite. 2012 Dec;59(3):945-8
pubmed: 23000277
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Sep 25;4:44
pubmed: 17894878
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64
pubmed: 15090118
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 28;15:971
pubmed: 26415527
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 31;14:894
pubmed: 25175279
Child Dev. 1985 Oct;56(5):1345-57
pubmed: 4053746
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(Suppl 2):S97-S101
pubmed: 29093041
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 28;11(9):8940-61
pubmed: 25170684
Psychol Rep. 2016 Aug;119(1):5-26
pubmed: 27229344
Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109(4):634-42
pubmed: 11927708
Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):1012-7
pubmed: 20876180