A novel approach for optimal graft positioning and tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery based on the finite element modeling technique.


Journal

The Knee
ISSN: 1873-5800
Titre abrégé: Knee
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9430798

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 08 05 2019
revised: 26 11 2019
accepted: 20 01 2020
pubmed: 7 2 2020
medline: 29 10 2020
entrez: 7 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In ACL-reconstructed patients the postoperative knee biomechanics may differ from the intact knee biomechanical behavior which can alter knee kinematics and kinetics, and as a result lead to the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of finite element models to define the optimal choices in surgical parameters in terms of optimal graft positioning in combination with graft type in order to restore the kinematic and kinetic behavior of the knee as best as possible. A workflow was proposed based on cadaveric experiments in order to restore the injured knee to a near normal physiological condition. Femoral and tibial graft insertion sites and graft fixation tension were optimized to obtain similar intact knee laxity, for three common single-bundle and one double-bundle reconstructions. To verify the success of the surgery with the variables calculated using the proposed workflow, a full walking cycle was simulated with the intact, ACL-ruptured, optimal ACL-reconstructed and non-optimal reconstructed knees. Our results suggested that for patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts, anatomical positioning (fixation force: 40 N), and for quadriceps tendon graft, isometric positioning (fixation tension: 85 N) could recover the intact joint kinematics and kinetics. Also for double-bundle reconstruction, with the numerically calculated optimal insertion sites, both bundles needed 50-N fixation force. With optimal graft positioning parameters, following the proposed workflow in this study, any of the single-bundle graft types and surgical techniques (single vs. double-bundle) may be used to acceptably recover the intact knee joint biomechanical behavior.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In ACL-reconstructed patients the postoperative knee biomechanics may differ from the intact knee biomechanical behavior which can alter knee kinematics and kinetics, and as a result lead to the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of finite element models to define the optimal choices in surgical parameters in terms of optimal graft positioning in combination with graft type in order to restore the kinematic and kinetic behavior of the knee as best as possible.
METHODS METHODS
A workflow was proposed based on cadaveric experiments in order to restore the injured knee to a near normal physiological condition. Femoral and tibial graft insertion sites and graft fixation tension were optimized to obtain similar intact knee laxity, for three common single-bundle and one double-bundle reconstructions. To verify the success of the surgery with the variables calculated using the proposed workflow, a full walking cycle was simulated with the intact, ACL-ruptured, optimal ACL-reconstructed and non-optimal reconstructed knees.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our results suggested that for patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts, anatomical positioning (fixation force: 40 N), and for quadriceps tendon graft, isometric positioning (fixation tension: 85 N) could recover the intact joint kinematics and kinetics. Also for double-bundle reconstruction, with the numerically calculated optimal insertion sites, both bundles needed 50-N fixation force.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
With optimal graft positioning parameters, following the proposed workflow in this study, any of the single-bundle graft types and surgical techniques (single vs. double-bundle) may be used to acceptably recover the intact knee joint biomechanical behavior.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32024608
pii: S0968-0160(20)30009-0
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.01.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

384-396

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hamid Naghibi (H)

Robotics and Mechatronics Lab, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. Electronic address: h.naghibibeidokhti@utwente.nl.

Dennis Janssen (D)

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Lab, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Tony Van Tienen (T)

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Lab, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Sebastiaan Van de Groes (S)

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Lab, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Ton Van de Boogaard (T)

Nonlinear Solid Mechanics, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Nico Verdonschot (N)

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Lab, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH