Sustainable intensification of crop residue exploitation for bioenergy: Opportunities and challenges.

agricultural management scenarios agricultural residues biomass climate change mitigation greenhouse gas emissions soil organic carbon spatially explicit modelling stakeholders sustainable agricultural intensification technical residue potentials

Journal

Global change biology. Bioenergy
ISSN: 1757-1693
Titre abrégé: Glob Change Biol Bioenergy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517159

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 25 05 2019
accepted: 30 07 2019
entrez: 7 2 2020
pubmed: 7 2 2020
medline: 7 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Crop residue exploitation for bioenergy can play an important role in climate change mitigation without jeopardizing food security, but it may be constrained by impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, and market, logistic and conversion challenges. We explore opportunities to increase bioenergy potentials from residues while reducing environmental impacts, in line with sustainable intensification. Using the case study of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany, we employ a spatiotemporally explicit approach combined with stakeholder interviews. First, the interviews identify agronomic and environmental impacts due to the potential reduction in SOC as the most critical challenge associated with enhanced crop residue exploitation. Market and technological challenges and competition with other residue uses are also identified as significant barriers. Second, with the use of agroecosystem modelling and estimations of bioenergy potentials and greenhouse gas emissions till mid-century, we evaluate the ability of agricultural management to tackle the identified agronomic and environmental challenges. Integrated site-specific management based on (a) humus balancing, (b) optimized fertilization and (c) winter soil cover performs better than our reference scenario with respect to all investigated variables. At the regional level, we estimate (a) a 5% increase in technical residue potentials and displaced emissions from substituting fossil fuels by bioethanol, (b) an 8% decrease in SOC losses and associated emissions, (c) an 18% decrease in nitrous oxide emissions, (d) a 37% decrease in mineral fertilizer requirements and emissions from their production and (e) a 16% decrease in nitrate leaching. Results are spatially variable and, despite improvements induced by management, limited amounts of crop residues are exploitable for bioenergy in areas prone to SOC decline. In order to sustainably intensify crop residue exploitation for bioenergy and reconcile climate change mitigation with other sustainability objectives, such as those on soil and water quality, residue management needs to be designed in an integrated and site-specific manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32025242
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12649
pii: GCBB12649
pmc: PMC6988490
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

71-89

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. GCB Bioenergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Energy Policy. 2013 Aug;59(100):161-171
pubmed: 24926116
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0145180
pubmed: 26680783
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 15;44(22):8773-80
pubmed: 20979408
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1291-1307
pubmed: 29245185
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4842-50
pubmed: 20194021
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jul;20(7):2301-20
pubmed: 24395589
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 07;11(4):e0151782
pubmed: 27055028
Environ Int. 2005 May;31(4):575-84
pubmed: 15788197
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Mar;23(3):1258-1281
pubmed: 27387228

Auteurs

Ioanna Mouratiadou (I)

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.

Tommaso Stella (T)

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany.

Thomas Gaiser (T)

Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation University of Bonn Bonn Germany.

Birka Wicke (B)

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.

Claas Nendel (C)

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany.

Frank Ewert (F)

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany.
Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation University of Bonn Bonn Germany.

Floor van der Hilst (F)

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH