Policy content analysis: Qualitative method for analyzing sub-national insect pollinator legislation.

Biodiversity conservation Cluster analysis Conservation policy Environmental policy Law NVivo Naturalistic inquiry Policy Qualitative content analysis Qualitative data analysis software Sustainability science Thematic analysis

Journal

MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 07 01 2019
accepted: 08 01 2020
entrez: 7 2 2020
pubmed: 7 2 2020
medline: 7 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This project examines sub-national legislative policy to identify trends and describe policy innovations for addressing insect pollinator declines. Content analysis is used to describe these policies quantitatively (number of policies and frequency per year) and qualitatively (topic, comparison of policy instruments used). The policies selected constitute a census-not a sample-of policies passed then approved by all US state legislatures and signed by state Governors into law from 2000 to 2017. We used QSR International's NVivo 10 text-based analytic software to organize and document our close-reading (line-by-line coding) of 109 laws to address insect pollinator population declines. Our analysis blended both conventional (inductive) and directed (deductive) content analysis approaches to reveal the spectrum of new legislative innovations and to describe lawmakers' evolving view of pollinating insects. Applying proven methods from the health sciences and communication studies can aid large-scale analysis of legal texts. •Qualitative content analysis of all US state-level laws passed from 2000 to 2017 addressing insect pollinators (N = 109).•The close-reading analysis mixed both conventional (inductive) and directed (deductive) content analysis approaches to reveal the spectrum of new legislative innovations and to describe evolving views of pollinating insects.•Compared inductively gathered findings from US policies to global experts' policy recommendations to evaluate status of conservation policy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32025507
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100787
pii: S2215-0161(20)30007-8
pii: 100787
pmc: PMC6996007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100787

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Références

Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
J Sch Health. 2010 Jul;80(7):326-32
pubmed: 20591097
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4570-8
pubmed: 27091979
Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1243-8
pubmed: 5699198
Science. 2016 Nov 25;354(6315):975-976
pubmed: 27884996
Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83
pubmed: 28718745

Auteurs

Damon M Hall (DM)

School of Natural Resources and the Department of Biomedical, Biological & Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, United States.

Rebecca Steiner (R)

Saint Louis University, Lewis & Clark Community College, United States.

Classifications MeSH