Changes in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Risks of Cardiovascular Events: A Post Hoc Analysis from the PICASSO Trial.
Cholesterol ester transfer proteins
Cholesterol, HDL
Cilostazol
Probucol
Secondary prevention
Journal
Journal of stroke
ISSN: 2287-6391
Titre abrégé: J Stroke
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101602023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2019
accepted:
11
12
2019
entrez:
7
2
2020
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
7
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Whether pharmacologically altered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) affects the risk of cardiovascular events is unknown. Recently, we have reported the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Asian Patients with Ischaemic Stroke at High Risk of Cerebral Haemorrhage (PICASSO) trial that demonstrated the non-inferiority of cilostazol to aspirin and superiority of probucol to non-probucol for cardiovascular prevention in ischemic stroke patients (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01013532). We aimed to determine whether on-treatment HDL-C changes by cilostazol and probucol influence the treatment effect of each study medication during the PICASSO study. Of the 1,534 randomized patients, 1,373 (89.5%) with baseline cholesterol parameters were analyzed. Efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis examined an interaction between the treatment effect and changes in HDL-C levels from randomization to 1 month for each study arm. One-month post-randomization mean HDL-C level was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group (1.08 mmol/L vs. 1.00 mmol/L, P<0.001). The mean HDL-C level was significantly lower in the probucol group than in the non-probucol group (0.86 mmol/L vs. 1.22 mmol/L, P<0.001). These trends persisted throughout the study. In both study arms, no significant interaction was observed between HDL-C changes and the assigned treatment regarding the risk of the efficacy endpoint. Despite significant HDL-C changes, the effects of cilostazol and probucol treatment on the risk of cardiovascular events were insignificant. Pharmacologically altered HDL-C levels may not be reliable prognostic markers for cardiovascular risk.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
Whether pharmacologically altered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) affects the risk of cardiovascular events is unknown. Recently, we have reported the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Asian Patients with Ischaemic Stroke at High Risk of Cerebral Haemorrhage (PICASSO) trial that demonstrated the non-inferiority of cilostazol to aspirin and superiority of probucol to non-probucol for cardiovascular prevention in ischemic stroke patients (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01013532). We aimed to determine whether on-treatment HDL-C changes by cilostazol and probucol influence the treatment effect of each study medication during the PICASSO study.
METHODS
METHODS
Of the 1,534 randomized patients, 1,373 (89.5%) with baseline cholesterol parameters were analyzed. Efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis examined an interaction between the treatment effect and changes in HDL-C levels from randomization to 1 month for each study arm.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One-month post-randomization mean HDL-C level was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group (1.08 mmol/L vs. 1.00 mmol/L, P<0.001). The mean HDL-C level was significantly lower in the probucol group than in the non-probucol group (0.86 mmol/L vs. 1.22 mmol/L, P<0.001). These trends persisted throughout the study. In both study arms, no significant interaction was observed between HDL-C changes and the assigned treatment regarding the risk of the efficacy endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite significant HDL-C changes, the effects of cilostazol and probucol treatment on the risk of cardiovascular events were insignificant. Pharmacologically altered HDL-C levels may not be reliable prognostic markers for cardiovascular risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32027796
pii: jos.2019.02551
doi: 10.5853/jos.2019.02551
pmc: PMC7005357
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01013532']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
108-118Subventions
Organisme : Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
Organisme : Ministry of Health and Welfare
ID : HI18C2383
Organisme : Ministry of Science and ICT
Organisme : National Research Foundation of Korea
ID : 2018M3A9E8066249
Références
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009 Mar;29(3):424-30
pubmed: 19122170
Lancet. 1995 May 20;345(8960):1274-5
pubmed: 7746058
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2109-22
pubmed: 17984165
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Sep 15;70(7):733-7
pubmed: 1519522
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):1289-302
pubmed: 9261259
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78
pubmed: 16214597
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2883-90
pubmed: 21799173
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb 20;39(4):610-6
pubmed: 11849859
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):135-46
pubmed: 18485135
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):572-80
pubmed: 22607825
Circulation. 2003 Apr 22;107(15):2031-6
pubmed: 12681995
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;59(17):1521-8
pubmed: 22516441
Circulation. 2010 Jun 15;121(23):2584-91
pubmed: 20516379
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1217-1227
pubmed: 28847206
J Stroke. 2015 Jan;17(1):2-6
pubmed: 25692102
Int J Stroke. 2015 Oct;10(7):1153-8
pubmed: 26044566
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2013 Jan;40(1):45-52
pubmed: 23167559
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2018 Aug;29(4):327-332
pubmed: 29630000
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 29;367(22):2089-99
pubmed: 23126252
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 13;364(2):127-35
pubmed: 21226578
Am J Med. 1977 May;62(5):707-14
pubmed: 193398
Eur Heart J. 2005 May;26(9):890-6
pubmed: 15764620
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Nov;207(1):16-23
pubmed: 19457483
Atherosclerosis. 2000 Oct;152(2):299-305
pubmed: 10998457
N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 7;337(6):365-72
pubmed: 9241125
Eur Heart J. 2015 Mar 1;36(9):539-50
pubmed: 24474739
Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7):1824-30
pubmed: 22539545
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Oct;30(4):855-62
pubmed: 9316509
Eur J Clin Invest. 1997 Apr;27(4):285-92
pubmed: 9134376
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jun;17(6):509-518
pubmed: 29778364
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 14;37(39):2999-3058
pubmed: 27567407