FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study.
Adult
Alanine Transaminase
/ analysis
Aspartate Aminotransferases
/ analysis
Biopsy
China
/ epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Progression
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
/ methods
England
/ epidemiology
Female
Fibrosis
/ classification
France
/ epidemiology
Humans
Liver
/ metabolism
Liver Cirrhosis
/ epidemiology
Malaysia
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
/ complications
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Turkey
/ epidemiology
United States
/ epidemiology
Journal
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 2468-1253
Titre abrégé: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101690683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
09
09
2019
revised:
21
10
2019
accepted:
22
10
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
entrez:
7
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The burden of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing globally, and a major priority is to identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) who are at greater risk of progression to cirrhosis, and who will be candidates for clinical trials and emerging new pharmacotherapies. We aimed to develop a score to identify patients with NASH, elevated NAFLD activity score (NAS≥4), and advanced fibrosis (stage 2 or higher [F≥2]). This prospective study included a derivation cohort before validation in multiple international cohorts. The derivation cohort was a cross-sectional, multicentre study of patients aged 18 years or older, scheduled to have a liver biopsy for suspicion of NAFLD at seven tertiary care liver centres in England. This was a prespecified secondary outcome of a study for which the primary endpoints have already been reported. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by FibroScan device were combined with aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or AST:ALT ratio. To identify those patients with NASH, an elevated NAS, and significant fibrosis, the best fitting multivariable logistic regression model was identified and internally validated using boot-strapping. Score calibration and discrimination performance were determined in both the derivation dataset in England, and seven independent international (France, USA, China, Malaysia, Turkey) histologically confirmed cohorts of patients with NAFLD (external validation cohorts). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01985009. Between March 20, 2014, and Jan 17, 2017, 350 patients with suspected NAFLD attending liver clinics in England were prospectively enrolled in the derivation cohort. The most predictive model combined LSM, CAP, and AST, and was designated FAST (FibroScan-AST). Performance was satisfactory in the derivation dataset (C-statistic 0·80, 95% CI 0·76-0·85) and was well calibrated. In external validation cohorts, calibration of the score was satisfactory and discrimination was good across the full range of validation cohorts (C-statistic range 0·74-0·95, 0·85; 95% CI 0·83-0·87 in the pooled external validation patients' cohort; n=1026). Cutoff was 0·35 for sensitivity of 0·90 or greater and 0·67 for specificity of 0·90 or greater in the derivation cohort, leading to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0·83 (84/101) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0·85 (93/110). In the external validation cohorts, PPV ranged from 0·33 to 0·81 and NPV from 0·73 to 1·0. The FAST score provides an efficient way to non-invasively identify patients at risk of progressive NASH for clinical trials or treatments when they become available, and thereby reduce unnecessary liver biopsy in patients unlikely to have significant disease. Echosens and UK National Institute for Health Research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The burden of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing globally, and a major priority is to identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) who are at greater risk of progression to cirrhosis, and who will be candidates for clinical trials and emerging new pharmacotherapies. We aimed to develop a score to identify patients with NASH, elevated NAFLD activity score (NAS≥4), and advanced fibrosis (stage 2 or higher [F≥2]).
METHODS
This prospective study included a derivation cohort before validation in multiple international cohorts. The derivation cohort was a cross-sectional, multicentre study of patients aged 18 years or older, scheduled to have a liver biopsy for suspicion of NAFLD at seven tertiary care liver centres in England. This was a prespecified secondary outcome of a study for which the primary endpoints have already been reported. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by FibroScan device were combined with aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or AST:ALT ratio. To identify those patients with NASH, an elevated NAS, and significant fibrosis, the best fitting multivariable logistic regression model was identified and internally validated using boot-strapping. Score calibration and discrimination performance were determined in both the derivation dataset in England, and seven independent international (France, USA, China, Malaysia, Turkey) histologically confirmed cohorts of patients with NAFLD (external validation cohorts). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01985009.
FINDINGS
Between March 20, 2014, and Jan 17, 2017, 350 patients with suspected NAFLD attending liver clinics in England were prospectively enrolled in the derivation cohort. The most predictive model combined LSM, CAP, and AST, and was designated FAST (FibroScan-AST). Performance was satisfactory in the derivation dataset (C-statistic 0·80, 95% CI 0·76-0·85) and was well calibrated. In external validation cohorts, calibration of the score was satisfactory and discrimination was good across the full range of validation cohorts (C-statistic range 0·74-0·95, 0·85; 95% CI 0·83-0·87 in the pooled external validation patients' cohort; n=1026). Cutoff was 0·35 for sensitivity of 0·90 or greater and 0·67 for specificity of 0·90 or greater in the derivation cohort, leading to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0·83 (84/101) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0·85 (93/110). In the external validation cohorts, PPV ranged from 0·33 to 0·81 and NPV from 0·73 to 1·0.
INTERPRETATION
The FAST score provides an efficient way to non-invasively identify patients at risk of progressive NASH for clinical trials or treatments when they become available, and thereby reduce unnecessary liver biopsy in patients unlikely to have significant disease.
FUNDING
Echosens and UK National Institute for Health Research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32027858
pii: S2468-1253(19)30383-8
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30383-8
pmc: PMC7066580
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aspartate Aminotransferases
EC 2.6.1.1
Alanine Transaminase
EC 2.6.1.2
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01985009']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362-373Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;16(6):377-386
pubmed: 31024089
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;15(1):11-20
pubmed: 28930295
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Sep;32(6 Suppl 1):8-21
pubmed: 18973843
J Hepatol. 2019 Aug;71(2):371-378
pubmed: 30965069
Hepatology. 2008 Feb;47(2):455-60
pubmed: 18038452
Hepatology. 2014 Aug;60(2):565-75
pubmed: 24753132
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Dec;29(12):1705-13
pubmed: 14698338
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):134-144
pubmed: 28859228
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1147-1159.e5
pubmed: 26874076
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Nov;36(11):1825-35
pubmed: 20870345
Biom J. 2014 Jul;56(4):601-6
pubmed: 24615859
Hepatology. 2015 May;61(5):1547-54
pubmed: 25125077
Hepatology. 2015 Apr;61(4):1392-405
pubmed: 25557690
Gastroenterology. 2011 Oct;141(4):1249-53
pubmed: 21726509
BMJ. 2015 Jan 07;350:g7594
pubmed: 25569120
Hepatology. 2017 May;65(5):1557-1565
pubmed: 28130788
Hepatology. 2005 Jun;41(6):1313-21
pubmed: 15915461
Hepatology. 2018 May;67(5):1754-1767
pubmed: 28833331
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):389-97.e10
pubmed: 25935633
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;3(7):509-517
pubmed: 29893235
J Hepatol. 2019 Aug;71(2):313-322
pubmed: 31071367
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1717-1730
pubmed: 30689971
Hepatology. 2007 Apr;45(4):846-54
pubmed: 17393509