Establishing a Global Standard for Wearable Devices in Sport and Fitness: Perspectives from the New England Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine Members.
Journal
Current sports medicine reports
ISSN: 1537-8918
Titre abrégé: Curr Sports Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101134380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
2
2020
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
14
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recent explosion of wearable technology and the associated concerns prompted the International Federation of Sports Medicine (FIMS) to create a quality assurance standard for wearable devices, which provides commissioned testing of marketing claims and endorsement of commercial wearables that test favorably. An open forum as announced in the conference advertising was held at the Annual Meeting of the New England Regional Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine (NEACSM) November 7 to 8, 2019, in Providence, Rhode Island, USA for attending NEACSM members to voice their input on the process. Herein, we report the proceedings. The round table participants perceived the quality assurance standard to be important, but identified some practical process challenges that included the broad scope and complexity of the device universe, the need for a multiphase testing pathway, and the associated fees for product evaluation. The participants also supported the evaluation of device data analysis, behavioral influences, and user experience in the overall evaluation. Looking forward, the FIMS quality assurance standard faces the challenge of balancing these broader perspectives with practical constraints of budget, facilities, time, and human resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32028347
doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000680
pii: 00149619-202002000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45-49Références
Success of Apple Watch means more growth in sales of wearable technology [Internet]. CCS insight; [cited 2019 November 20]. Available from: https://www.ccsinsight.com/press/company-news/3695-success-of-apple-watch-means-more-growth-in-sales-of-wearable-technology/.
Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2019. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2019; 23:10–8.
Duking P, Stammel C, Sperlich B, et al. Necessary steps to accelerate the integration of wearable sensors into recreation and competitive sports. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2018; 17:178–82.
Seshadri DR, Li RT, Voos JE, et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 1–18.
Peake JM, Kerr G, Sullivan JP. A critical review of consumer wearables, mobile applications, and equipment for providing biofeedback, monitoring stress, and sleep in physically active populations. Front. Physiol. 2018; 9:743.
Jo E, Lewis K, Directo D, et al. Validation of biofeedback wearables for photoplethysmographic heart rate tracking. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2016; 15:540–7.
Wellness programs raise privacy concerns over health data [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): The Society for Human Resource Management; [cited 2019 November 20]. Available from: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/wellness-programs-raise-privacy-concerns-over-health-data.aspx.
Peraklsis E, Coravos A. Is health-care data the new blood? Lancet Dig. Health. 2019; 1:e8–9.
Baron KG, Abbott S, Jao N, et al. Orthosomnia: are some patients taking the quantified self too far? J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2017; 13:351–4.
Duking P, Fuss FK, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Recommendations for assessment of the reliability, sensitivity, and validity of data provided by wearable sensors designed for monitoring physical activity. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6:e102.
Shcherbina A, Mattsson CM, Waggott D, et al. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J. Pers. Med. 2017; 7. doi:10.3390/jpm7020003.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning-based software as a medical device [internet]. White Oak (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; [cited 2019 November 21]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/122535/download.
Keadle SK, Lyden KA, Strath SJ, et al. A framework to evaluate devices that assess physical behavior. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2019; 47:206–14.
University of Massachusetts Amherst. Institute for Applied Life Sciences [Internet]. Amherst (MA): University of Massachusetts Amherst; [cited 2019 November 21]. Available from: https://www.umass.edu/ials/about.
Clinicaltrials.gov Search Results [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; [cited 2019 November 29]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=fitbit&Search=Apply&recrs=a&age_v=&gndr=&type=&rslt=.
Breton MD, Patek SD, Lv D, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and insulin informed advisory system with automated titration and dosing of insulin reduces glucose variability in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2018; 20:531–40.
CNN. Burns from fitness trackers prompt recall of about 30,000 gadgets [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CNN; [cited 2019 November 21]. Available from: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/health/provata-fitness-tracker-recall/index.html.