Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education.
Journal
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
2
2020
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Simulation is rarely used to help individuals with chronic diseases develop skills. The aim of the study was to provide recommendations for the use of simulation in therapeutic patient education (S-TPE). Expert consensus was achieved with the participation of the following 3 groups of experts: (a) expert patients and caregivers; (b) health professionals specialized in therapeutic patient education (TPE); and (c) simulation experts. Each expert received a list of questions by e-mail in 3 iterations. The synthesis of the 2 first questionnaires resulted in 34 first recommendations voted during the consensus conference meeting. Each recommendation was subject to an extensive literature review. The quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were assessed through the evaluation, development, and evaluation criteria categories (GRADE criteria). The third questionnaire selected and illustrated recommendations more specific to the use of S-TPE. At the end of the process, the experts identified 26 recommendations specific to the use of S-TPE. They proposed examples of skills in different diseases and stressed the importance of adapting the conditions of use (location, equipment, time of the care) to the circumstances of the patient learner and skills to be developed. Experts should exercise great caution as this technique presents ethical considerations related to patient care. These recommendations underline the fact that simulation could bring added value to TPE. They provide a framework and examples for the experimental use of simulation in TPE. Research into feasibility and acceptability is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32028445
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000401
pii: 01266021-202002000-00007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30-38Références
World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases. Accessed July 1, 2018.
Wagner EH. Managed care and chronic illness: health services research needs. Health Serv Res 1997;32(5):702–714.
Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care 2001;39(11):1217–1223.
World Health Organization Working Group. Therapeutic patient education: continuing education programmes for health care providers in the field of prevention of chronic diseases. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/145294/E63674.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2018.
Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004;164(15):1641–1649.
Albano MG, Crozet C, d'Ivernois JF. Analysis of the 2004–2007 literature on therapeutic patient education in diabetes: results and trends. Acta Diabetol 2008;45(4):211–219.
Lefèvre T, Gagnayre R, Gignon M. Patients with chronic conditions: simulate to educate? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2017;22(5):1315–1319.
Fonte D, Apostolidis T, Lagouanelle-Simeoni MC. Psychosocial skills and therapeutic education of patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review [in French]. Sante Publique 2014;26(6):763–777.
Lapostolle F, Hamdi N, Barghout M, et al. Diabetes education of patients and their entourage: out-of-hospital national study (EDUCATED 2). Acta Diabetol 2017;54(4):353–360.
White RO, Eden S, Wallston KA, et al. Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98(2):144–149.
Haute Autorité de Santé - Institut National de Prévention et d'Education en Santé (HAS/INPES). Structuring a therapeutic patient education programme in the field of chronic diseases, methodological guide, June 2007 [in French]. Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/etp_-_guide_version_finale_2_pdf.pdf. Accessed April 9, 2017.
Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Health simulation, 2010 [in French]. Available at: https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_930641/fr/simulation-en-sante. Accessed April 9, 2017.
Huang GC, McSparron JI, Balk EM, et al. Procedural instruction in invasive bedside procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effective teaching approaches. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(4):281–294.
Kleinert R, Wahba R, Chang D-H, Plum P, Hölscher AH, Stippel DL. 3D immersive patient simulators and their impact on learning success: a thematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e91.
Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebø S, O'Donnell JM. Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc 2011;(Suppl 6):S10–S13.
Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JDH, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy 2010;94(3):183–195.
Berkhof M, van Rijssen HJ, Schellart AJM, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns 2011;84(2):152–162.
Ilgen JS, Sherbino J, Cook DA. Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(2):117–127.
Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Hamel C, et al. The future of patient safety: surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool. Patient Saf Surg 2008;2:16.
Coleman EA. Extending simulation learning experiences to patients with chronic health conditions. JAMA 2014;311(3):243–244.
Penneçot C, Gignon M, Bardou M, Gagnayre R. Simulation and therapeutic patient education: never on yourself (or your loved ones) the first time. Ther Patient Educ 2015;7(2):20403.
Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Lee M, Johnson K. Development and pilot testing of a parent education intervention for type 1 diabetes parent education through simulation–diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2012;38(1):50–57.
Sullivan-Bolyai S, Johnson K, Cullen K, et al. Tried and true: self-regulation theory as a guiding framework for teaching parents diabetes education using human patient simulation. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2014;37(4):340–349.
Sullivan-Bolyai S, Crawford S, Bova C, et al. PETS-D: impact on diabetes management outcomes. Diabetes Educ 2015;41(5):537–549.
Ramchandani N, Maguire LL, Stern K, Quintos JB, Lee M, Sullivan-Bolyai S. PETS-D (parents education through simulation-diabetes): parents' qualitative results. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:1362–1367.
Ramchandani N, Johnson K, Cullen K, Hamm T, Bisordi J, Sullivan-Bolyai S. CDE perspectives of providing new-onset type 1 diabetes education using formal vignettes and simulation. Diabetes Educ 2017;43(1):97–104.
Raines DA. Simulation as part of discharge teaching for parents of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2017;42(2):95–100.
Maguire LL, Crawford S, Sullivan-Bolyai S. Grandparent education through simulation-diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2015;41(6):678–689.
Gross O, Gagnayre R. What expert patients report that they do in the French health care system, and the competencies and personality traits required. Ther Patient Educ 2014;6(2):20104.
Mullen PM. When is a Delphi not a Delphi? Discussion Paper N° 37. Health Services Management. Birmingham: Centre, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham; 2000.
Keeney S. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Google Book; 2010.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al., GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924–926.
Debussche X, Balcou-Debussche M, La Hausse de Lalouvière V, Besançon S, Roddier M, Rastami J. Enhancing the access to therapeutic education and reducing health inequalities: lessons learned from interventions conducted in Africa and Indian Ocean [in French]. Medecine des maladies methaboliques (Elsevier) 2015;9(2):131–136.
Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2(2):115.
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc 2016;11(3):209–217.
Alinier G. Developing high-fidelity health care simulation scenarios: a guide for educators and professionals. Simul Gaming 2011;42(1):9–26.
Burke H, Mancuso L. Social cognitive theory, metacognition, and simulation learning in nursing education. J Nurs Educ 2012;51(10):543–548.
D'Ivernois J-F, Gagnayre R. Learning to educate the patient: pedagogical approach: the Bobigny school [in French]. Paris: Éd. Maloine; 2016.
Weiner E, Trangenstein P, McNew R, Gordon J. Using the virtual reality world of second life to promote patient engagement. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016;225:198–202.
Desveaux L, Shaw J, Saragosa M, et al. A mobile app to improve self-management of individuals with type 2 diabetes: qualitative realist evaluation. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(3):e81.
Hall K, Tori K. Best practice recommendations for debriefing in simulation-based education for Australian undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs 2017;13(1):39–50.
Dufrene C, Young A. Successful debriefing - best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: a literature review. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34(3):372–376.
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F, et al. Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol. BMJ Open 2017;7(11):e016400.
Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Brown R. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes? Psychooncology 2012;21(12):1265–1274.
Buleon C, Le Toux A-L, Piquet M-A, et al. Repeated simulator-based learning improves technical performance, stress management and leadership among medical specialty interns. EM-Consulte-Masson [Internet]. Elsevier. 2015. Available at: https://www.em-consulte.com/article/998566/article/un-apprentissage-repete-sur-simulateur-permet-d-am. Accessed March 8, 2019.
Cyrulnik B, Jorland G, eds. Resilience: basic knowledge. Paris: Odile Jacob; 2012. 222p.
Kübler-Ross E. On death and dying. London: Tavistock; 1970.
Boer LM, Daudey L, Peters JB, Molema J, Prins JB, Vercoulen JH. Assessing the Stages of the Grieving Process in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Validation of the Acceptance of Disease and Impairments Questionnaire (ADIQ). Int J Behav Med 2014;21(3):561–570.
Blanch-Hartigan D. An effective training to increase accurate recognition of patient emotion cues. Patient Educ Couns 2012;89(2):274–280.
Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ 2012;46(7):636–647.
Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34(6):e58–e63.