Direct Brachial Approach for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Experience.

Basilar artery Brachial artery Endovascular procedures Stroke Thrombectomy

Journal

Neurointervention
ISSN: 2093-9043
Titre abrégé: Neurointervention
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101561462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 20 12 2019
accepted: 30 12 2019
pubmed: 8 2 2020
medline: 8 2 2020
entrez: 8 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In mechanical endovascular thrombectomy (MET) for acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) in the elderly, navigating a guide catheter via the femoral artery may be difficult due to the approach route's significant tortuosity. To resolve this problem, we have been performing a technique that uses a direct brachial approach (DiBA) with a large-bore aspiration catheter. We reported our preliminary clinical experience with this technique. MET for ABAO using the DiBA technique was performed on 4 consecutive patients between August 2017 and December 2018. In all patients, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B or 3 recanalization was achieved, but the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days was ≥4. There were no technical difficulties or complications with this technique. The DiBA technique is an effective and feasible approach in MET for ABAO. Although excellent clinical outcomes could not be achieved, the angiographic outcomes were excellent with no technical complications. This approach can be an alternative to the femoral artery approach, particularly for tortuous arteries in the elderly.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32028756
pii: neuroint.2019.00290
doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2019.00290
pmc: PMC7105096
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

31-36

Références

N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95
pubmed: 25882376
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;6(4):260-4
pubmed: 24569575
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88
pubmed: 27673305
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):407-415
pubmed: 29243285
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20
pubmed: 25517348
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
Neurointervention. 2015 Sep;10(2):74-81
pubmed: 26389010
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2367-2374
pubmed: 29958848
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1154-1159
pubmed: 27986848
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):141-5
pubmed: 24302483
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Feb;7(2):90-4
pubmed: 24463439
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Jun 15;401:29-33
pubmed: 31005761
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Mar;9(3):316-323
pubmed: 26323793
Interv Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;19(4):500-5
pubmed: 24355157
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 May;5 Suppl 1:i70-3
pubmed: 23117130
Intern Med. 2014;53(9):1017-21
pubmed: 24785896
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Jun;21(3):381-6
pubmed: 25964434

Auteurs

Teishiki Shibata (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Masahiro Oomura (M)

Department of Neurology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Yusuke Nishikawa (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Mitsuhito Mase (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH