Outcomes from salvage chemotherapy or pembrolizumab beyond progression with or without local ablative therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancers with PD-L1 ≥50% who progress on first-line immunotherapy: real-world data from a European cohort.

Local ablative therapy PD-L1 ≥50% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pembrolizumab beyond progression salvage chemotherapy

Journal

Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez: 8 2 2020
pubmed: 8 2 2020
medline: 8 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this real-world multicenter study we addressed the activity of post-progression anticancer treatments after first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥50%. Clinico-pathological data of PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who failed first-line pembrolizumab were collected in 14 Oncologic Centers from different European countries. Types of subsequent anticancer treatment and outcomes on salvage chemotherapy or pembrolizumab beyond progression with or without the addition of local ablative therapies were reported. Out of 173 patients, 100 had progressed on pembrolizumab, of which 60 patients (60%) met eligibility criteria and were treated with either salvage chemotherapy (42/60, 70%) or pembrolizumab beyond progression (18/60, 30%). Overall, median age was 66 years, 63.3% were male, 60.0% had a performance status of 0-1, 88.3% were smokers and 61.7% had adenocarcinoma histology. In patients evaluable for response, objective response rate to salvage chemotherapy was 41.9%, with no significant difference according to the type of regimen (42.9% for platinum-based and 40.0% for single-agent chemotherapy). Median progression-free survival (PFS) to salvage chemotherapy was 4.5 months. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab beyond progression, 13 out of 18 patients (72.2%) had progressive disease in ≤2 organ sites, of whom 9 (69.2%) were managed with the addition of local ablative therapies consisting of radiation at progressive lesion(s). No significant difference was noted in terms of post-progression survival between the salvage chemotherapy and the pembrolizumab beyond progression groups of patients (6.9 versus 8.1 months, respectively, P=0.08). In PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who progress on first-line pembrolizumab, salvage chemotherapy is associated with a remarkable anticancer activity, while select patients may benefit from continuation of pembrolizumab beyond progression, with the possible addition of local ablative radiotherapy in oligoprogressive cases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In this real-world multicenter study we addressed the activity of post-progression anticancer treatments after first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥50%.
METHODS METHODS
Clinico-pathological data of PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who failed first-line pembrolizumab were collected in 14 Oncologic Centers from different European countries. Types of subsequent anticancer treatment and outcomes on salvage chemotherapy or pembrolizumab beyond progression with or without the addition of local ablative therapies were reported.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 173 patients, 100 had progressed on pembrolizumab, of which 60 patients (60%) met eligibility criteria and were treated with either salvage chemotherapy (42/60, 70%) or pembrolizumab beyond progression (18/60, 30%). Overall, median age was 66 years, 63.3% were male, 60.0% had a performance status of 0-1, 88.3% were smokers and 61.7% had adenocarcinoma histology. In patients evaluable for response, objective response rate to salvage chemotherapy was 41.9%, with no significant difference according to the type of regimen (42.9% for platinum-based and 40.0% for single-agent chemotherapy). Median progression-free survival (PFS) to salvage chemotherapy was 4.5 months. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab beyond progression, 13 out of 18 patients (72.2%) had progressive disease in ≤2 organ sites, of whom 9 (69.2%) were managed with the addition of local ablative therapies consisting of radiation at progressive lesion(s). No significant difference was noted in terms of post-progression survival between the salvage chemotherapy and the pembrolizumab beyond progression groups of patients (6.9 versus 8.1 months, respectively, P=0.08).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who progress on first-line pembrolizumab, salvage chemotherapy is associated with a remarkable anticancer activity, while select patients may benefit from continuation of pembrolizumab beyond progression, with the possible addition of local ablative radiotherapy in oligoprogressive cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32030213
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.23
pii: jtd-11-12-4972
pmc: PMC6988053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

4972-4981

Informations de copyright

2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest: This work was presented in abstract form at World Conference on Lung Cancer 2019. Giulio Metro has had consulting/advisory relationship with Boehringher-Ingelheim; Giuseppe Banna has had consulting/advisory relationships with Boehringher-Ingelheim, Janssen-Cilag, Roche; Athina Christopoulou has had consulting/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi; Antonio Calles received honorary/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringher-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Helena Linardou has had consulting/advisory relationships with AstraZeneca, Boehringher-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche; Paris Kosmidis has had consulting/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 16;9:264
pubmed: 31058078
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jul;13(7):978-986
pubmed: 29738824
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Jan;30(1):1-4
pubmed: 29153859
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265
pubmed: 27979383
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1510-7
pubmed: 26951310
Immunotherapy. 2018 Mar;10(3):163-165
pubmed: 29370724
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jan;13(1):106-111
pubmed: 29101058
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;37(28):2518-2527
pubmed: 31154919
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:90-95
pubmed: 29191606
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Nov 30;11:787
pubmed: 29225694
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11;:null
pubmed: 31294751
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 May;20(3):178-185.e2
pubmed: 30910574
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jun;13(6):831-839
pubmed: 29578107
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Dec;13(12):1906-1918
pubmed: 30217492
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;37(7):537-546
pubmed: 30620668
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):149-152
pubmed: 28917596
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 8;8(53):91795-91802
pubmed: 29207685

Auteurs

Giulio Metro (G)

Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Alfredo Addeo (A)

Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

Diego Signorelli (D)

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Alessio Gili (A)

Public Health Section, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Panagiota Economopoulou (P)

Oncology Department, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Fausto Roila (F)

Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Giuseppe Banna (G)

Medical Oncology, Ospedale Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy.

Alessandro De Toma (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Juliana Rey Cobo (J)

Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

Andrea Camerini (A)

U.O.C. Oncologia, Ospedale Versilia, Lido di Camaiore (LU), Italy.

Athina Christopoulou (A)

Medical Oncology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Giuseppe Lo Russo (G)

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Marco Banini (M)

Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Domenico Galetta (D)

Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.

Beatriz Jimenez (B)

Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.

Ana Collazo-Lorduy (A)

Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.

Antonio Calles (A)

Division of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Panagiotis Baxevanos (P)

Second Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Savvas Anti-Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Helena Linardou (H)

First Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Paris Kosmidis (P)

Second Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Marina C Garassino (MC)

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Giannis Mountzios (G)

Second Department of Medical Oncology, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.

Classifications MeSH