Differences in presentation and clinical outcomes between left or right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Journal

European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
ISSN: 2048-8734
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101591369

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 8 2 2020
medline: 1 6 2021
entrez: 8 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the presence of a left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block may be associated with worse prognosis compared to isolated ST segment elevation. However, specificities in clinical presentation and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block are poorly characterized. We analysed acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block ( Acute myocardial infarction patients with bundle branch block were older and had more pre-existing cardiovascular conditions compared to ST segment elevation. Pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock were most frequent in patients with left bundle branch block (18.8% vs 12.0% for right bundle branch block and 7.9% for ST segment elevation, Compared to ST segment elevation, an isolated bundle branch block reflects high-risk clinical characteristics but does not independently determine increased hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the presence of a left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block may be associated with worse prognosis compared to isolated ST segment elevation. However, specificities in clinical presentation and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block or right bundle branch block are poorly characterized.
METHODS METHODS
We analysed acute myocardial infarction patients with left bundle branch block (
RESULTS RESULTS
Acute myocardial infarction patients with bundle branch block were older and had more pre-existing cardiovascular conditions compared to ST segment elevation. Pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock were most frequent in patients with left bundle branch block (18.8% vs 12.0% for right bundle branch block and 7.9% for ST segment elevation,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Compared to ST segment elevation, an isolated bundle branch block reflects high-risk clinical characteristics but does not independently determine increased hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32030999
doi: 10.1177/2048872620905101
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

848-856

Auteurs

Matthias R Meyer (MR)

Division of Cardiology, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Dragana Radovanovic (D)

AMIS-Plus Data Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Giovanni Pedrazzini (G)

Department of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino, Switzerland.

Hans Rickli (H)

Division of Cardiology, St Gallen County Hospital, Switzerland.

Marco Roffi (M)

Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland.

Thomas Rosemann (T)

Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Franz R Eberli (FR)

Division of Cardiology, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

David J Kurz (DJ)

Division of Cardiology, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH