Impact of Person-Centered Interventions on Patient Outcomes in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Journal
Journal of nursing care quality
ISSN: 1550-5065
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Care Qual
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
8
2
2020
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
8
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Preventing adverse events is one of the most important issues in health care. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the impact of person-centered interventions on patient outcomes in an acute care setting. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Eligible interventions included person-centered interventions that address at least one of these outcomes: pressure ulcer, accidental falls, medication errors, and/or cross infection. The review showed that there is a paucity of evidence supporting the use of person-centered interventions in reducing patient falls. For the other outcomes, existing research provides an insufficient evidence base on which to draw conclusions. Theory of person-centeredness is still in its ascendency. Poor evidence may also be the result of quantitative research designs that are insufficient in studying the impact of a person-centered approach. We postulate that use of mixed-methods designs is beneficial and would give a clearer picture of the impact of person-centered interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Preventing adverse events is one of the most important issues in health care.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the impact of person-centered interventions on patient outcomes in an acute care setting.
METHODS
METHODS
The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Eligible interventions included person-centered interventions that address at least one of these outcomes: pressure ulcer, accidental falls, medication errors, and/or cross infection.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The review showed that there is a paucity of evidence supporting the use of person-centered interventions in reducing patient falls. For the other outcomes, existing research provides an insufficient evidence base on which to draw conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Theory of person-centeredness is still in its ascendency. Poor evidence may also be the result of quantitative research designs that are insufficient in studying the impact of a person-centered approach. We postulate that use of mixed-methods designs is beneficial and would give a clearer picture of the impact of person-centered interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32032336
pii: 00001786-202101000-00021
doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000471
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E14-E21Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
World Health Organization. Patient safety. https://www.who.int/patientsafety/en/ . Published 2004. Accessed December 4, 2019.
Vrbnjak D, Pahor D, Štiglic G, Pajnkihar M. Content validity and internal reliability of Slovene version of Medication Administration Error Survey. Slovenian Nurs Rev. 2016;50(1):20–40.
World Health Organization. Patient safety: making health care safer. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255507/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.11-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y . Published 2017. Accessed August 3, 2018.
World Health Organization. The World Alliance for Patient Safety: Forward Programme 2005. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004:1–33. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/en/brochure_final.pdf . Accessed August 3, 2018.
Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 9 June 2009 on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections. Off J EU. 2009;151(3.7.2019):1–6.
McCance T, McCormack B. The person-centred practice framework. In: McCormack B, McCance T, eds. Person-Centred Practice in Nursing and Health Care: Theory and Practice. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017:36–68.
McCormack B, McCance TV. Development of a framework for person-centred nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(5):472–479.
McCormack B, McCance T. Person-Centred Nursing: Theory and Practice. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2010.
Håkansson J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, et al. Patient education and counseling “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):3–11.
Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviewers. Adelaide, Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/Reviewers-Manual_Methodology-for-JBI-Scoping-Reviews_2015_v2.pdf . Accessed February 1, 2019.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRSMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Ryan R, Hill S. How to GRADE the Quality of Evidence. CCCG. Version 3.0. Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University; 2018. https://cccrg.cochrane.org/author-resources . Accessed December 1, 2016.
Chaboyer W, Bucknall T, Webster J, et al. The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): a cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;64:63–71.
Wolf D, Lehman L, Quinlin R, et al. Can nurses impact patient outcomes using a patient-centered care model? J Nurs Adm. 2008;38(12):532–540.
Goldsack J, Bergey M, Mascioli S, Cunningham J. Hourly rounding and patient falls. Nursing. 2015;45(2):25–30.
Sand-Jecklin K, Sherman J. A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(19-20):2854–2863.
Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, et al. Proposal: a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf . Published 2011. Accessed January 1, 2017.
Ogilvie D, Fayter D, Petticrew M, et al. The harvest plot: a method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:8.
Cann T, Gardner A. Change for the better: an innovative model of care delivering positive patient and workforce outcomes. Collegian. 2012;19(2):107–113.
Shahid S, Thomas S. Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) communication tool for handoff in health care—a narrative review. Saf Health. 2018;4:7.
Sand-Jecklin K, Sherman J. Incorporating bedside report into nursing handoff: evaluation of change in practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28:186–194.
Ciccu-Moore R, Grant F, Niven BA, Paterson H, Stoddart K, Wallace A. Care and comfort rounds: improving standards. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2014;20(9):18–23.
Shin N, Park J. The effect of intentional nursing rounds based on the care model on patients' perceived nursing quality and their satisfaction with nursing services. Asian Nurs Res. 2018;12:203–208.
Dewing J, McCormack B, eds. Editorial: tell me, how do you define person-centredness? J Clin Nurs. 2016;26(17-18):2509–2510.
Jacobs G, van Lieshout F, Borg M, Ness O. Being a person-centred researcher: principles and methods for doing research in a person-centred way. In: McCormack B, van Dulmen S, Eide H, Skovdahl K, Eide T, eds. Person-Centred Healthcare Research. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017:51–60.
van Dulmen S, McCormack B, Eide T, Skovdahl K, Eide H. Future directions for person-centred healthcare research. In: McCormack B, van Dulmen S, Eide H, Skovdahl K, Eide T, eds. Person-Centred Healthcare Research. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017:209–218.
Baraas RC, Hagen LA, Pedersen HR, Gjelle Jon VB. Doing eye and vision research in a person-centred way. In: McCormack B, van Dulmen S, Eide H, Skovdahl K, Eide T, eds. Person-Centred Healthcare Research. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017:181–188.
Badian RA, McCormack B, Sundling V. Person-centered research: a novel approach to randomized controlled trials. Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2018;6(2):209–218.
Clissett P, Porock D, Harwood RH, Gladman JRF. The challenges of achieving person-centred care in acute hospitals: a qualitative study of people with dementia and their families. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(11):1495–1503.